Homelessness and Social Work: Voices from the Street. This course is aimed at increasing student awareness of contemporary social welfare policies, programs and practice issues relevant to providing social work services to homeless and other poor people. The homeless experience is examined in the context of societal oppression and political resistance.
Graduates of the UNE SSWO will demonstrate knowledge, skills, and leadership in the following:
Through the completion of their assignments, students will be able to:
A variety of learning activities are designed to support the course objectives, facilitate different learning styles, and build a community of learners. Learning activities for each module include the following: reading materials, podcasts, videos and interactive lectures.
Description: This course includes extensive reading materials as well as some videos and other materials.
Description: The course uses a policy framework to explore the phenomenon of homelessness along multiple dimensions and through this lens view the complexities of homelessness from a variety of perspectives, i.e., from the “lived experience” of homelessness, from the perspective of its historical, cultural, economic and political contexts, and from the various policy, legislative and judicial contexts that fund homeless services, determine their priorities and hold the system accountable. Discussion topics each week are framed around these dimensions.
You are expected to actively participate in whole class and/or small group discussion forums each week. To actively participate in the forums means to provide an initial response to the discussion questions and a minimum of two (2) responses to different classmates per week, unless otherwise indicated. Your initial post does not count towards responses to others. This is the minimum standard for response discussion, however, there are no limitations to the number or length of your response in class discussions.
The “Discussion Board” is an opportunity for you to examine new ideas and learn how to articulate some of the essential concepts, theories, and language that frame your profession. Think of it as your “sandbox” to explore, challenge, and reflect on practice. Your professional success going forward will depend upon what you know but it will also depend upon how well you can express what you know and use knowledge effectively.
Responses to others must add substantively to the discussion by building upon classmates’ ideas or posing critical questions to further the discussion. For example, a posting of “I agree with what people are saying” is not sufficient. What is considered sufficient is initiating further discussion; promoting further thought; providing critical or integrative dialogue; providing effective support or encouragement; challenging by showing supporting literature or other documentation, and/or self-reflecting regarding the topic. Responses should reflect your ability to apply critical thinking in the discussion and topical analysis. What is critical thinking? Very simply, critical thinking means that you provide an objective, logical analysis of a topic by asking questions.
Your initial post to the weekly discussion prompt should be submitted by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on Saturday, or as early as possible in the week, since doing so facilitates student-to-student interaction and maximizes the learning experience for everyone.
Response posts are due by 11:59 p.m. ET on Tuesday. Late responses may result in a reduction in grade.
Grading and Feedback Method: Grading and feedback methods are listed with each specific discussion assignment. Please refer to the rubrics provided in each Learning Modules and Discussion Boards for more information. The course facilitator will return any assignments and other grading items (discussion boards, participation, etc.) to students within three days of the assignment due date. The course facilitator will provide weekly feedback about participation and performance no later than four days after the learning module closes. Feedback can be via email, within the assignment itself, or using the Feedback column in the Grade Center.
Discussion forums are graded using the College-wide Discussion Rubric.
Description: One very important dimension of homelessness concerns how a community responds to homelessness, how community providers and community leaders organize homeless services, and how they plan to address homelessness in their community. Another dimension concerns how these services are funded and how funds are monitored and communities are held accountable. In this country, a major source of funding for homeless services is legislated by Congress through the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act and is administered by the U.S. Dept. of Urban Development (HUD). HUD requires that every community receiving funds under the McKinney Act organize community stakeholders to consider and decide upon a comprehensive plan to “end homelessness” in their community within the next ten years. The organization of community stakeholders is known as the “Continuum of Care” and the plan they create is called the “Ten Year Plan to End Homelessness”. Almost all states and all communities have both a Continuum and a Ten Year Plan.
In this assignment, you are asked to critique the Ten Year Plan for your community. To complete the assignment you will need to either find the Ten Year Plan online for your community or you can download the sample Ten-Year Plan for Portland, ME. To find the Plan for your community, try conducting a web search or contact your local or regional Community Development Office for a copy of the Plan. To help guide you through the Plan, it is also advisable that you contact the Chairperson of the local “Continuum of Care” to obtain their perspective and insights into the unique issues facing your local community or region.
For your paper, consider the following questions:
This analysis will take the form of a paper which will be 5 pages in length, not including the cover or reference pages. The paper is due by the end of Week 3.
Description: In this course, you will prepare and submit a written paper that discusses some aspect of homelessness in your community. In it, you will describe homelessness in your local community. “Community” here is defined as your own city or town or your local region, e.g., “lower Fairfield County”.
Your paper should describe homelessness within your community along the multiple dimensions of homelessness we explore through our class discussions and presentations, e.g., general characteristics of the homeless population, history, policy and legislative issues, program interventions, etc. Through your readings and discussions, you will find that homelessness is a complex, many-layered phenomenon; your paper should reflect that same complexity. For example, you will note the complexity of the homeless population, i.e., the social-economic demographics and various sub-populations, such as young adults and the “chronically homeless.” We will discuss cultural factors associated with homelessness, how cultural values within our community impact services (e.g., stigma) and how economic factors and implementation issues impact upon the problem (e.g., think of key pieces of funding legislation, such as the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act and the creation of local “Continuum of Care” within each community).
Keep in mind that the paper is not a general discussion of homelessness but a discussion of homelessness in your own community. Focus your description locally and apply the knowledge you gain through this course to explore the various aspects of homelessness in your own local community, i.e., on various sub-populations, on service design, and how various stakeholders collaborate through advocacy coalitions and integrated service models, effectiveness and cost.
To best accomplish this you may want to visit your local shelter if you have not done so already and gain insights from that first-hand experience.
Finally, add your own conclusions and provide your own summary evaluation of homeless services in your community. Briefly summarize where you believe progress has been made and where your community remains challenged. What are the implications for program development and policy advocacy? What would be your recommendations to improve the community’s response to homelessness? Try to be as specific as possible. To support your conclusions and add depth to your arguments, be certain to provide relevant data and evidence whenever possible and use citations where appropriate.
The assignment should be six to seven pages in length.
Next Steps and Final Reflection
Description: For the past seven weeks, you have been keeping a journal of your new knowledge and practice implications for working with someone who is experiencing homelessness. For this assignment, you will bring this together into a formal academic paper. Please reflect on your journal entries and consider how you may use what you have learned in your social work practice with someone who is homeless.
Your paper should be 5-7 pages, including references.
Description: You will keep a journal log and each week write an entry into the log that captures your own thoughts and reflections about the material covered in the class and our class discussions. What are the issues and challenges of homelessness? How do these issues impact upon your own community?
Due Dates: Due dates for all learning activities are provided in the “Course Schedule.”
The School of Social Work uses the following grading system for all courses with the exception of field education courses. Students are expected to maintain a “B” (3.0) average over the course of their study. Students with less than a GPA of 3.0 will be placed on academic probation. Students must have an overall GPA of 3.0 in order to receive their Master’s Degree.
Your grade in this course will be determined by the following criteria:
Assignment | Point Value | Percent of the Total Grade |
---|---|---|
Discussions | 225 points (9 discussions x 25 points each) | 22.5% |
Analysis of local plan to end homelessness in your community | 125 points | 12.5% |
Weekly Journals | 300 points (50 points X 7 weeks) | 35% |
Reflection paper "Homelessness and its impact on my community" | 150 points | 15% |
Next Steps and Final Reflection | 150 points | 15% |
Total | 1,000 points | 100% |
Grade | Points Grade | Point Average (GPA) |
A | 94 – 100% | 4.00 |
A- | 90 – 93% | 3.75 |
B+ | 87 – 89% | 3.50 |
B | 84 – 86% | 3.00 |
B- | 80 – 83% | 2.75 |
C+ | 77 – 79% | 2.50 |
C | 74 – 76% | 2.00 |
C- | 70 – 73% | 1.75 |
D | 64 – 69% | 1.00 |
F | 00 – 63% | 0.00 |
All assignments are to be submitted by 11:59 p.m. EST on the dates listed below. Unless otherwise specified below, all module discussions and assignments are due the last day of the module or unit week.
Your Student Support Specialist is a resource for you. Please don't hesitate to contact them for assistance, including, but not limited to course planning, current problems or issues in a course, technology concerns, or personal emergencies.
Questions? Visit the Student Support Social Work page
ITS Contact: Toll Free Help Desk 24 hours/7 days per week at 1-877-518-4673
Any student who would like to request, or ask any questions regarding, academic adjustments or accommodations must contact the Student Access Center at (207) 221-4438 or pcstudentaccess@une.edu. Student Access Center staff will evaluate the student's documentation and determine eligibility of accommodation(s) through the Student Access Center registration procedure.
Togetherall is a 24/7 communication and emotional support platform monitored by trained clinicians. It’s a safe place online to get things off your chest, have conversations, express yourself creatively, and learn how to manage your mental health. If sharing isn’t your thing, Togetherall has other tools and courses to help you look after yourself with plenty of resources to explore. Whether you’re struggling to cope, feeling low, or just need a place to talk, Togetherall can help you explore your feelings in a safe supportive environment. You can join Togetherall using your UNE email address.
Students should notify their Student Support Specialist and instructor in the event of a problem relating to a course. This notification should occur promptly and proactively to support timely resolution.
ITS Contact: Toll-Free Help Desk 24 hours/7 days per week at 1-877-518-4673.
The College of Professional Studies supports its online students and alumni in their career journey!
The Career Ready Program provides tools and resources to help students explore and hone in on their career goals, search for jobs, create and improve professional documents, build professional network, learn interview skills, grow as a professional, and more. Come back often, at any time, as you move through your journey from career readiness as a student to career growth, satisfaction, and success as alumni.
Grading for class participation will be in accordance with the Discussion Participation grading rubric. The following are the guidelines and expectations for discussion participation in this course:
Timeliness: Unless otherwise instructed, the initial post is due by midnight Saturday and response is due by the end of the module. Late postings to the discussion forum after the module is ended will not be awarded a grade.
Content: Comments and responses posted in the discussion are expected to be relevant and provide a “critical analysis” of the topical material on homelessness. In addition, comments should provide significant detail to support any statement or analysis, including relevant examples, evidence from the readings and other scholarly sources that might shed light on the discussion issues. In general, “critical thinking” is the process of applying “reason” to a particular problem and analyzing, synthesizing, and evaluating information gathered from our observations and experience. At its best, “critical thinking” applies a set of well-accepted intellectual values to the reasoning process, the values of clarity, accuracy, precision, consistency, relevance, evidence, depth and of analysis and fairness. Evidence of such values is expected to be found in the content of your discussion post and characterize your participation.
Peer Feedback and Interaction: Please respond to a minimum of 2 peers with substantial feedback. In your feedback, offer constructive critique, suggestions, in-depth questions, additional resources, and stimulating thoughts and/or probes. Postings to the discussion board must add substantively to the discussion by building upon classmates’ ideas or posing critical questions to further the discussion. A posting of “I agree with what people are saying” is not sufficient.
Academic Integrity and Quality: Source material must be properly paraphrased and/or cited and referenced in APA style. You are expected to write in complete sentences, your own words, use correct punctuation and spelling.
You are expected to participate in classroom discussions and demonstrate an understanding and integration of course material in your critical thinking and analysis.
Participation in weekly discussion provides an opportunity to explore new ideas and develop a capacity for critical thinking on the issues raised in this course. This is your opportunity to elaborate on your ideas, challenge your thinking and challenge the thinking of others. Think of it as your “sandbox” to explore, challenge, and reflect on the many practice issues that are raised here through your readings and discussion with peers. The success you establish in your professional career may depend on what you know but just as much it will depend upon your capacities to express what you know and communicate it effectively in the various practice contexts social workers work within.
Discussion participation will be monitored on a weekly basis, and you are welcome to check in with the instructor if you have questions regarding participation. Keep in mind that weekly postings make up a significant percentage of the final grade.
Discussion Etiquette: All postings must be respectful. Postings which are inappropriate, inflammatory, or disrespectful will be deleted. Continued inappropriate postings may result in termination from the class and referral for additional disciplinary action within the school. If at any time you are concerned about a posting, please notify your instructor immediately.
Please refer to the Participation Rubric often.
In terms of effort, discussion participation is expected to conform to the following guidelines:
Please review the essential academic and technical standards of the University of New England School Social Work (SSW): https://online.une.edu/social-work/academic-and-technical-standards-une-online-ssw/
The College of Professional Studies uses Turnitin to help deter plagiarism and to foster the proper attribution of sources. Turnitin provides comparative reports for submitted assignments that reflect similarities in other written works. This can include, but is not limited to, previously submitted assignments, internet articles, research journals, and academic databases.
Make sure to cite your sources appropriately as well as use your own words in synthesizing information from published literature. Webinars and workshops, included early in your coursework, will help guide best practices in APA citation and academic writing.
You can learn more about Turnitin in the guide on how to navigate your Similarity Report.
Please review the technical requirements for UNE Online Graduate Programs: Technical Requirements
Student and faculty participation in this course will be governed by standards in the NASW Code of Ethics relating to confidentiality in sharing information from their placement sites and practice experiences. Students should be aware that personal information they choose to share in class, class assignments or conversations with faculty does not have the status of privileged information.
Assignments: Late assignments will be accepted up to 3 days late; however, there is a 10% grade reduction (from the total points) for the late submission. After three days the assignment will not be accepted.
Discussion posts: If the initial post is submitted late, but still within the discussion board week, there will be a 10% grade reduction from the total discussion grade (e.g., a 3 point discussion will be reduced by 0.3 points). Any posts submitted after the end of the Discussion Board week will not be graded.
Please make every effort ahead of time to contact your instructor and your student support specialist if you are not able to meet an assignment deadline. Arrangements for extenuating circumstances may be considered by faculty.
8 week: Students taking online graduate courses through the College of Professional Studies will be administratively dropped for non-participation if a graded assignment/discussion post is not submitted before Sunday at 11:59 pm ET of the first week of the term. Reinstatement is at the purview of the Dean's Office.
16 week: Students taking online graduate courses through the College of Professional Studies will be administratively dropped for non-participation if a graded assignment/discussion post is not submitted before Friday at 11:59 pm ET of the second week of the term. Reinstatement is at the purview of the Dean's Office.
The policies contained within this document apply to all students in the College of Professional Studies. It is each student's responsibility to know the contents of this handbook.
Please contact your student support specialist if you are considering dropping or withdrawing from a course. The last day to drop for 100% tuition refund is the 2nd day of the course. Financial Aid charges may still apply. Students using Financial Aid should contact the Financial Aid Office prior to withdrawing from a course.
The University of New England values academic integrity in all aspects of the educational experience. Academic dishonesty in any form undermines this standard and devalues the original contributions of others. It is the responsibility of all members of the University community to actively uphold the integrity of the academy; failure to act, for any reason, is not acceptable. For information about plagiarism and academic misconduct, please visit UNE Plagiarism Policies.
Academic dishonesty includes, but is not limited to the following:
Charges of academic dishonesty will be reviewed by the Program Director. Penalties for students found responsible for violations may depend upon the seriousness and circumstances of the violation, the degree of premeditation involved, and/or the student’s previous record of violations. Appeal of a decision may be made to the Dean whose decision will be final. Student appeals will take place through the grievance process outlined in the student handbook.