As partial fulfillment of the requirements for the MPH degree, students will collaborate with a public health site that they have identified to evaluate an aspect of a health promotion program. All MPH students must create a high-quality written product, synthesizing public health competencies. Based on their selected program, students will develop and conduct an evaluation plan and present their findings in a high-quality written document. This is an iterative course, designed to facilitate successful progress towards completion of a formal written project, which may be considered for publishing with UNE’s public-facing repository of outstanding student work.
Applied Practice Experience (APE)
GPH 731 or
GPH 743
GPH 744 Integrative Learning Experience Foundation Course
GPH 702 An Interprofessional Approach to Policy and Advocacy
GPH 706 Public Health Administration & Leadership
GPH 712 Principles of Epidemiology
GPH 714 Principles of Public Health
GPH 716 Biostatistics
GPH 719 Research Methods
GPH 722 Introduction to Environmental Health
GPH 726 Social and Behavioral Health
GPH 738 Program Planning & Evaluation
FC 4: Interpret results of data analysis for public health research, policy or practice
FC 6: Discuss the means by which structural bias, social inequities and racism undermine health and create challenges to achieving health equity at organizational, community, and systemic levels
FC 7: Assess population needs, assets, and capacities that affect communities’ health
FC 8: Apply awareness of cultural values and practices to the design, implementation, or critique of public health policies or programs
FC 11: Select methods to evaluate public health programs
FC 13. Propose strategies to identify stakeholders and build coalitions and partnerships for influencing public health outcomes
FC 14: Advocate for political, social or economic policies and programs that will improve health in diverse populations
FC 19: Communicate audience-appropriate (i.e., non-academic, non-peer audience) public health content, both in writing and through oral presentation
Utilizing a worksheet from the self-study guide as a template, identify stakeholders in the three broad categories: those affected, those involved in operations, and those who will use the evaluation results. Then identify key stakeholders needed to improve credibility, implementation, advocacy, or funding/authorization decisions.
Conduct a literature review focusing on sources that are related to the health program you are addressing and evaluations that are relevant to your topic.
Provide a logic model for your program that visually depicts the inputs, activities, outputs, outcomes, and impact. Use arrows to demonstrate the relationships between specific elements.
Submit 4-7 overarching questions that your data analysis will aim to answer. Evaluation questions should be clear and precise so that they help focus your methods and analysis. They should also be realistic (answerable), relevant to key stakeholders, and open-ended (not yes/no questions).
Integrate formative research and key stakeholder data to provide a detailed outline of the background section of your paper.
Establish an appropriate plan for data collection that is feasible and equitable.
Submit a detailed outline of the methodology section of your evaluation plan that describes the methods used to collect and analyze your data.
Submit data collection instruments you developed for your ILE project and will use to collect participant data (surveys, focus group guides, key informant interview guides, etc.).
Submit a detailed outline showing the findings of your ILE data collection.
Submit a draft of the discussion section that supports arguments with evidence, highlights the implications of the findings for public health practice and includes future recommendations resulting from the evaluation.
Submit a draft of the full report for feedback.
Integrating faculty mentor feedback, submit a clean draft of the final report, including an abstract, executive summary, background, methods, results, and discussion.
Submit oral presentation slides for faculty mentor feedback. Slides must follow CDC accessibility guidelines.
Your grade in this course will be determined by the following criteria:
Acknowledgement of Academic Engagement | 1 |
1:1 Meetings with your Instructor | 4 |
Learning Journal Entries | 16 |
Week 1: Identifying Key Stakeholders | 2 |
Week 2: Literature Review | 5 |
Week 4: Logic Model | 3 |
Week 4: Evaluation Questions | 3 |
Week 5: Background Section Online | 5 |
Week 6: Data Collection Logistics | 3 |
Week 7: Outline of Methodology Section | 7 |
Week 8: Data Collection Instruments | 3 |
Week 11: Outline of Finding Section | 5 |
Week 12: Full Draft of Discussion Section | 6 |
Week 13: Full Draft ILE Report | 10 |
Week 14: Presentation Slides | 5 |
Week 15: Final ILE Report | 17 |
Week 16: Discussion | 2 |
Week 15 Oral Presentation | 3 |
Total | 100 |
Grade | Points Grade | Point Average (GPA) |
A | 94 – 100% | 4.00 |
A- | 90 – 93% | 3.75 |
B+ | 87 – 89% | 3.50 |
B | 84 – 86% | 3.00 |
B- | 80 – 83% | 2.75 |
C+ | 77 – 79% | 2.50 |
C | 74 – 76% | 2.00 |
C- | 70 – 73% | 1.75 |
D | 64 – 69% | 1.00 |
F | 00 – 63% | 0.00 |
Each week opens on Wednesday at 12:01 AM Eastern Time (ET). Each week closes on Wednesday at 11:59 PM ET, with the exception of Week 16, which ends on Sunday.
Week 1: Jan 15 – Jan 22
Week 2: Jan 22 – Jan 29
Week 3: Jan 29 – Feb 5
Week 4: Feb 5 – Feb 12
Week 5: Feb 12 – Feb 19
Week 6: Feb 19 – Feb 26
Week 7: Feb 26 – Mar 5
Week 8: Mar 5 – Mar 9
Week 9: Oct 30 – Nov 6
Week 10: Nov 6 – Nov 13
Week 11: Nov 13 – Nov 20
Week 12: Nov 20 – Nov 27
Week 13: Nov 27 – Dec 4
Week 14: Dec 4 – Dec 11
Week 15: Dec 11 – Dec 18
Week 16: Dec 18 – Dec 22
Please make sure to review the full assignment prompts in the course. Make sure to carefully review the modules in the course.
Using the Worksheet 1A – Identifying Key Stakeholders section from the CDC’s Program Evaluation Guide as a template, identify stakeholders in the following three broad categories:
Then identify key stakeholders needed to improve credibility, implementation, advocacy, or funding/authorization decisions. In the same document and using the list of questions under the “What to Ask Stakeholders” section as a guide, develop a shortlist of questions to use when meeting with your stakeholders. Questions should be relevant, useful, and encourage stakeholder engagement (i.e. open-ended).
You will collect and synthesize data on the following characteristics of the public health issue:
Building on your previous literature review in GPH 744, complete the Literature Review Template by adding 7 additional peer-reviewed sources relevant to your public health topic. Add the five sources from your GPH 744 Week 8 Literature Review to the template as well. The template should include a total of 12 relevant sources published no longer than seven years ago.
Submit a logic model of the program that you are evaluating which visually depicts the inputs, activities, outputs, outcomes, and impact. It should include the primary resources and all major activities necessary to implement the program. Use arrows to demonstrate the relationships between specific elements.
Submit your 4-7 evaluation questions for review.
Background Section Outline
Submit a detailed outline of your background section using this template. The sections should address each bullet point briefly. This outline will be expanded later in the course to become the background section of your final evaluation summary report. Remember to include your citations.
I. Introduction
II. Etiology and Risk Factors
III. Epidemiology and Burden of Disease
IV. Public Health Significance
V. Existing Interventions
VI. Describe the program you are evaluating
Complete Worksheet 4B – Data Collection Logistics from the CDC’s Self-Study Guide. Answers should be clear and succinct, providing enough detail so the reader understands how the data will be/was collected and is assured that proper protections are in place to ensure credibility and confidentiality.
Be sure to address issues related to:
If you are collecting quantitative data, include at least 2 dummy tables. For qualitative data collection, include 3 to 5 sample codes and their definitions.
Submit a detailed outline of your methodology section, which is essentially your evaluation plan. The outline should include the following:
Data Collection
Data Analysis (Remember this is your data analysis process, not your findings)
Please submit all data collection instruments you developed for your ILE project and will use to collect participant data (surveys, focus group guides, key informant interview guides, etc.).
Please answer the following questions.
Submit an outline of your findings sections using the following template. This is not an all-inclusive outline. This outline is to help organize your thoughts on your findings and is not necessarily the structure of your final finding section. Do not submit charts, graphs, tables, and data visualizations in this template but as you are working through the outline consider where they may better convey your findings in your final evaluation summary report.
I. Introduction
II. Findings by Evaluation Question
III. Health Equity Considerations
IV. Significance and Implications
V. Limitations
Please answer the following questions:
Submit a full draft of the discussion section of your paper, including your conclusion.
Submit a full draft of your paper as a Word document, including a title page, and ensure all aspects of your draft are formatted to meet AMA 11th formatting, including page numbers, line spaces, and heading format.
Important things to consider when putting your presentation together:
Initial post:
Watch the video: Using a Journal Selector Tool
Choose a free selection tool and submit the abstract from your final paper to discover a list of academic journals that may be a good fit for your work. Choose one of the journals and in 400-500 words, explain why you chose the journal and what impact you think your work could have if published in that journal.
Peer responses are optional.
Please answer the following questions.
Your Student Support Specialist is a resource for you. Please don't hesitate to contact them for assistance, including, but not limited to course planning, current problems or issues in a course, technology concerns, or personal emergencies.
Questions? Visit the Student Support Public Health page
UNE's Student Academic Success Center (SASC) offers a range of free online services to support your academic achievement. Writing support, ESOL support, study strategy and learning style consultations, as well as downloadable resources, are available to all matriculating students. The SASC also offers tutoring for GPH 712 Epidemiology, GPH 716 Biostatistics, GPH 717 Applied Epidemiology, GPH 718 Biostatistics II, and GPH 719 Research Methods. To make an appointment for any of these services, go to une.tutortrac.com. For more information and to view and download writing and studying resources, please visit:
Any student who would like to request, or ask any questions regarding, academic adjustments or accommodations must contact the Student Access Center at (207) 221-4438 or pcstudentaccess@une.edu. Student Access Center staff will evaluate the student's documentation and determine eligibility of accommodation(s) through the Student Access Center registration procedure.
Togetherall is a 24/7 communication and emotional support platform monitored by trained clinicians. It’s a safe place online to get things off your chest, have conversations, express yourself creatively, and learn how to manage your mental health. If sharing isn’t your thing, Togetherall has other tools and courses to help you look after yourself with plenty of resources to explore. Whether you’re struggling to cope, feeling low, or just need a place to talk, Togetherall can help you explore your feelings in a safe supportive environment. You can join Togetherall using your UNE email address.
Students should notify their Student Support Specialist and instructor in the event of a problem relating to a course. This notification should occur promptly and proactively to support timely resolution.
ITS Contact: Toll-Free Help Desk 24 hours/7 days per week at 1-877-518-4673.
The College of Professional Studies supports its online students and alumni in their career journey!
The Career Ready Program provides tools and resources to help students explore and hone in on their career goals, search for jobs, create and improve professional documents, build professional network, learn interview skills, grow as a professional, and more. Come back often, at any time, as you move through your journey from career readiness as a student to career growth, satisfaction, and success as alumni.
The American Medical Association Manual (AMA) of Style, 11th edition is the required writing format for this course. Additional support for academic writing and AMA format is provided throughout the coursework as well as at the UNE Portal for Online Students.
Online resources: AMA Style Guide
The College of Professional Studies uses Turnitin to help deter plagiarism and to foster the proper attribution of sources. Turnitin provides comparative reports for submitted assignments that reflect similarities in other written works. This can include, but is not limited to, previously submitted assignments, internet articles, research journals, and academic databases.
Make sure to cite your sources appropriately as well as use your own words in synthesizing information from published literature. Webinars and workshops, included early in your coursework, will help guide best practices in APA citation and academic writing.
You can learn more about Turnitin in the guide on how to navigate your Similarity Report.
Please review the technical requirements for UNE Online Graduate Programs: Technical Requirements
Course surveys are one of the most important tools that University of New England uses for evaluating the quality of your education, and for providing meaningful feedback to instructors on their teaching. In order to assure that the feedback is both comprehensive and precise, we need to receive it from each student for each course. Evaluation access is distributed via UNE email at the beginning of the last week of the course.
Students are responsible for submitting work by the date indicated in Brightspace.
Quizzes and Tests: Quizzes and tests must be completed by the due date. They will not be accepted after the due date.
Assignments: Unless otherwise specified, assignments will be accepted up to 3 days late; however, there is a 10% grade reduction (from the total points) for the late submission. After three days the assignment will not be accepted.
Discussion posts: If the initial post is submitted late, but still within the discussion board week, there will be a 10% grade reduction from the total discussion grade (e.g., a 3 point discussion will be reduced by 0.3 points). Any posts submitted after the end of the Discussion Board week will not be graded.
Please make every effort ahead of time to contact your instructor and your student support specialist if you are not able to meet an assignment deadline. Arrangements for extenuating circumstances may be considered by faculty.
The policies contained within this document apply to all students in the College of Graduate and Professional Studies. It is each student's responsibility to know the contents of this handbook.
Please contact your student support specialist if you are considering dropping or withdrawing from a course. The last day to drop for 100% tuition refund is the 2nd day of the course. Financial Aid charges may still apply. Students using Financial Aid should contact the Financial Aid Office prior to withdrawing from a course.
The University of New England values academic integrity in all aspects of the educational experience. Academic dishonesty in any form undermines this standard and devalues the original contributions of others. It is the responsibility of all members of the University community to actively uphold the integrity of the academy; failure to act, for any reason, is not acceptable. For information about plagiarism and academic misconduct, please visit https://www.une.edu/studentlife/plagiarism.
Academic dishonesty includes, but is not limited to the following:
Charges of academic dishonesty will be reviewed by the Program Director. Penalties for students found responsible for violations may depend upon the seriousness and circumstances of the violation, the degree of premeditation involved, and/or the student’s previous record of violations. Appeal of a decision may be made to the Dean whose decision will be final. Student appeals will take place through the grievance process outlined in the student handbook.
8 week: Students taking online graduate courses through the College of Professional Studies will be administratively dropped for non-participation if a graded assignment/discussion post is not submitted before Sunday at 11:59 pm ET of the first week of the term. Reinstatement is at the purview of the Dean's Office.
16 week: Students taking online graduate courses through the College of Professional Studies will be administratively dropped for non-participation if a graded assignment/discussion post is not submitted before Friday at 11:59 pm ET of the second week of the term. Reinstatement is at the purview of the Dean's Office.
The policies contained within this document apply to all students in the College of Professional Studies. It is each student's responsibility to know the contents of this handbook.
Please contact your student support specialist if you are considering dropping or withdrawing from a course. The last day to drop for 100% tuition refund is the 2nd day of the course. Financial Aid charges may still apply. Students using Financial Aid should contact the Financial Aid Office prior to withdrawing from a course.
The University of New England values academic integrity in all aspects of the educational experience. Academic dishonesty in any form undermines this standard and devalues the original contributions of others. It is the responsibility of all members of the University community to actively uphold the integrity of the academy; failure to act, for any reason, is not acceptable. For information about plagiarism and academic misconduct, please visit UNE Plagiarism Policies.
Academic dishonesty includes, but is not limited to the following:
Charges of academic dishonesty will be reviewed by the Program Director. Penalties for students found responsible for violations may depend upon the seriousness and circumstances of the violation, the degree of premeditation involved, and/or the student’s previous record of violations. Appeal of a decision may be made to the Dean whose decision will be final. Student appeals will take place through the grievance process outlined in the student handbook.