Advance Policy Analysis offers the opportunity for students to develop and complete their own analysis of public health issue that intersects with government actions as partial fulfillment of the requirements for their MPH degree. All MPH students must create a high quality written product, synthesizing public health competencies. Based on their selected topics, students will analyze data related to a real-world problem and present their findings in high quality written documents. Readings and lectures will provide further education and guidance, and all assignments are designed to guide students through the analysis and writing process. At the end of the course, students will have a full draft of their policy analysis and be ready to enroll in the 8-week, 1-credit GPH 744 Integrative Learning Experience.
PC 1. Synthesize and incorporate scientific evidence into professional writing
PC 2. Search databases and critically analyze peer-reviewed literature
PC 3. Develop strategies for qualitative and quantitative data management.
FC 1. Apply epidemiological methods to the breadth of settings and situations in public health practice
FC 2. Select quantitative and qualitative data collection methods appropriate for a given public health context
FC 3. Analyze quantitative and qualitative data using biostatistics, informatics, computer-based programming and software, as appropriate
FC 4. Interpret results of data analysis for public health research, policy or practice
FC 8. Apply awareness of cultural values and practices to the design or implementation of public health policies
FC 12. Discuss multiple dimensions of the policy-making process, including the roles of ethics and evidence
FC 14. Advocate for political, social or economic policies and programs that will improve health in diverse populations
FC 15. Evaluate policies for their impact on public health and health equity
FC 19. Communicate audience-appropriate public health content, both in writing and through oral presentation
Download the provided Excel spreadsheet and save it to your computer for ongoing use. Review the workplan template and complete “Tasks” column and any known “sub-tasks”. Fill in expected timeframes in Gantt chart format. Add your name, project title, and other relevant information. Set up page 2 of the workplan template with “Project Notes”. Your submission is your completed spreadsheet.
Submit an updated Advanced Elective Proposal (ILE) with additional detail on any aspect, including target audiences, methods, or updated competencies. This assignment is ungraded.
Incorporate feedback from the instructor on your Project Workplan in Week 1, and any additional edits of your own, and resubmit your updated workplan spreadsheet.
Submit the results of your literature review as a table (i.e. Excel spreadsheet) and a summary of the steps used for your literature review (300-500 words).
Download the Application for Exemption and the Consent Template for Adults from the IRB website and read the instructions carefully, particularly the Additional Documentation requirements. Draft your Research Proposal Summary. Complete the Informed Consent document. Compile all additional documentation (e.g. CITI certificate, resume, etc).
Write a draft outreach email to one potential key informant; be sure to identify your student status, a brief description of your project, the type of information you need from the prospective interviewee, and be specific about what they should do next if they are willing to participate.
Create a page in your workplan to deposit and track information on possible key informants. What information, besides name and contact info, do you need to keep track of to help you in your outreach and interview scheduling efforts? Submit your updated workplan, being sure to integrate changes based on your prior instructor feedback. Include an introductory note at the top of your work plan that summarizes your current status.
Submit a draft interview protocol for one group of key informants. Be sure to write a brief introduction to your project that you will begin the interview with as a way to orient your interviewee to your project. Add one or two prompts (i.e. follow-up) questions to your primary questions that will help you explore the topic with your interviewee in greater detail. Create a spreadsheet page on your workplan for your data collection. The structure can be your own, but be sure it has all of the categories you need and is logically constructed.
Now that you have read about several policy process theories, write a 500-word summary identifying the theory or framework you will apply to your policy analysis project, explaining why you chose the theory or framework, and how it will support your analysis and generate new knowledge for your audience(s). Include reference to some of the fundamental attributes of the theory or framework you choose and, as appropriate, those of theories you did not choose.
Details can be found in the course.
Write a 500-word summary describing your coding structure. Identify your primary themes and any sub-themes that you have identified in your data analysis. Describe the categories of key informants and four (4) key themes that you did find, or expect to find, in the key informant interviews. Describe any sub-themes that emerged within the dominant themes. Explain how you identified key themes and include a few references to these themes from your data. Were there any unexpected themes? If so, describe how these themes differed from your expectations and offer explanations for these differences.
Write the Introduction to your paper and a first draft of the Background section. The Introduction should be no longer than 1-2 paragraphs and it will introduce the reader to your topic. The Background section will contain contextual information about the policy at issue in your paper. Submit a detailed outline of the remaining sections of the paper, with headings and subheading that reflect the progression of your analysis. Be sure to refer to the ILE Template in the course for formatting information. You do not need to submit a Title page, Abstract, or Table of Contents.
Prepare a 1,000 word summary of your thematic analysis. This summary will build on your assignment in Week 10 and prepare you to draft the Discussion section of your paper. Describe your thematic analysis using a logical flow, organizing your themes and sub-themes so that they lead to policy conclusions and/or recommendations. Include sufficient detail (e.g. quotes and key phrases) from your key informant interviews to provide context and credibility to your work.
Write the full Background section of your paper. This should include all of the information on the policy context and introduce your analytic approach. Submit a revised Introduction section and the Background section, incorporating all instructor feedback from Week 11.
Write the Methods and Discussion sections of your paper. This will include a full description of your analytic approach and your analysis of the issue and data. You may find it helpful to use your updated Workplan and process tracking from the Week 5 assignment to inform your Methods section.
Write the Conclusion of the paper and submit the full draft, including Introduction, Background, Methods, Discussion, and Conclusion. Do not include an Abstract.
Your grade in this course will be determined by the following criteria:
Assignments | Points |
Discussions (12 X 3 Points) | 36 |
Week 1: Workplan | 3 |
Week 2: Updated workplan | 2 |
Week 3: Literature Review Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria Table | 5 |
Week 4: IRB Exemption Application | 5 |
Week 5: Draft email to key informants | 3 |
Week 6: Draft of interview protocol and data collection | 3 |
Week 7: Theory summary | 5 |
Week 10: Summary of coding structure | 5 |
Week 11: Introduction and Background Section | 8 |
Week 12: Thematic Analysis | 5 |
Week 14: Revised Introduction and Background Sections | 5 |
Week 15: Methods and Discussion Sections | 5 |
Week 16: Full Draft | 10 |
Total Points | 100 |
Grade | Points Grade | Point Average (GPA) |
A | 94 – 100% | 4.00 |
A- | 90 – 93% | 3.75 |
B+ | 87 – 89% | 3.50 |
B | 84 – 86% | 3.00 |
B- | 80 – 83% | 2.75 |
C+ | 77 – 79% | 2.50 |
C | 74 – 76% | 2.00 |
C- | 70 – 73% | 1.75 |
D | 64 – 69% | 1.00 |
F | 00 – 63% | 0.00 |
Each week opens on Wednesday at 12:01 AM Eastern Time. Each week closes on Wednesday at 11:59 pm ET, with the exception of Week 16, which ends on Sunday.
The assignment/discussion descriptions mentioned below are summaries. Please make sure to review the full assignment prompts in Blackboard. There may be additional readings/videos that are not mentioned in this weekly summary, make sure to carefully review the modules in Blackboard.
You will also submit a summary (300-500 words) of the steps you used to conduct your literature review, describing the databases and search terms used as well as the methods for narrowing down the publications you will use. You should describe your inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Agenda Setting and Multiple Streams
Create a spreadsheet page on your workplan for your data collection. The structure can be your own, but be sure it has all of the categories you need and is logically constructed.
Public Comment on Regulatory Action
Introduction and Background Section: Write the Introduction to your paper and a draft of the Background section that will contain your policy context information. The Introduction should be no longer than 1-2 paragraphs and it will introduce the reader to your topic. The Background section will contain contextual information about the policy at issue in your paper. Submit a detailed outline of the remaining sections of the paper, with headings and subheading that reflect the progression of your analysis. Be sure to refer to the ILE Final Paper Template in Blackboard for formatting information. You do not need to submit a Title page, Abstract, or Table of Contents.
Ash, S. L., & Clayton, P. H. (2009). Generating, deepening, and documenting learning: The power of critical reflection in applied learning.
Your Student Support Specialist is a resource for you. Please don't hesitate to contact them for assistance, including, but not limited to course planning, current problems or issues in a course, technology concerns, or personal emergencies.
Questions? Visit the Student Support Public Health page
UNE's Student Academic Success Center (SASC) offers a range of free online services to support your academic achievement. Writing support, ESOL support, study strategy and learning style consultations, as well as downloadable resources, are available to all matriculating students. The SASC also offers tutoring for GPH 712 Epidemiology, GPH 716 Biostatistics, GPH 717 Applied Epidemiology, GPH 718 Biostatistics II, and GPH 719 Research Methods. To make an appointment for any of these services, go to une.tutortrac.com. For more information and to view and download writing and studying resources, please visit:
Any student who would like to request, or ask any questions regarding, academic adjustments or accommodations must contact the Student Access Center at (207) 221-4438 or pcstudentaccess@une.edu. Student Access Center staff will evaluate the student's documentation and determine eligibility of accommodation(s) through the Student Access Center registration procedure.
Togetherall is a 24/7 communication and emotional support platform monitored by trained clinicians. It’s a safe place online to get things off your chest, have conversations, express yourself creatively, and learn how to manage your mental health. If sharing isn’t your thing, Togetherall has other tools and courses to help you look after yourself with plenty of resources to explore. Whether you’re struggling to cope, feeling low, or just need a place to talk, Togetherall can help you explore your feelings in a safe supportive environment. You can join Togetherall using your UNE email address.
Students should notify their Student Support Specialist and instructor in the event of a problem relating to a course. This notification should occur promptly and proactively to support timely resolution.
ITS Contact: Toll-Free Help Desk 24 hours/7 days per week at 1-877-518-4673.
The College of Professional Studies supports its online students and alumni in their career journey!
The Career Ready Program provides tools and resources to help students explore and hone in on their career goals, search for jobs, create and improve professional documents, build professional network, learn interview skills, grow as a professional, and more. Come back often, at any time, as you move through your journey from career readiness as a student to career growth, satisfaction, and success as alumni.
The American Medical Association Manual (AMA) of Style, 11th edition is the required writing format for this course. Additional support for academic writing and AMA format is provided throughout the coursework as well as at the UNE Portal for Online Students.
Online resources: AMA Style Guide
The College of Professional Studies uses Turnitin to help deter plagiarism and to foster the proper attribution of sources. Turnitin provides comparative reports for submitted assignments that reflect similarities in other written works. This can include, but is not limited to, previously submitted assignments, internet articles, research journals, and academic databases.
Make sure to cite your sources appropriately as well as use your own words in synthesizing information from published literature. Webinars and workshops, included early in your coursework, will help guide best practices in APA citation and academic writing.
You can learn more about Turnitin in the guide on how to navigate your Similarity Report.
Please review the technical requirements for UNE Online Graduate Programs: Technical Requirements
Course surveys are one of the most important tools that University of New England uses for evaluating the quality of your education, and for providing meaningful feedback to instructors on their teaching. In order to assure that the feedback is both comprehensive and precise, we need to receive it from each student for each course. Evaluation access is distributed via UNE email at the beginning of the last week of the course.
Students are responsible for submitting work by the date indicated in Brightspace.
Quizzes and Tests: Quizzes and tests must be completed by the due date. They will not be accepted after the due date.
Assignments: Unless otherwise specified, assignments will be accepted up to 3 days late; however, there is a 10% grade reduction (from the total points) for the late submission. After three days the assignment will not be accepted.
Discussion posts: If the initial post is submitted late, but still within the discussion board week, there will be a 10% grade reduction from the total discussion grade (e.g., a 3 point discussion will be reduced by 0.3 points). Any posts submitted after the end of the Discussion Board week will not be graded.
Please make every effort ahead of time to contact your instructor and your student support specialist if you are not able to meet an assignment deadline. Arrangements for extenuating circumstances may be considered by faculty.
The policies contained within this document apply to all students in the College of Graduate and Professional Studies. It is each student's responsibility to know the contents of this handbook.
Please contact your student support specialist if you are considering dropping or withdrawing from a course. The last day to drop for 100% tuition refund is the 2nd day of the course. Financial Aid charges may still apply. Students using Financial Aid should contact the Financial Aid Office prior to withdrawing from a course.
The University of New England values academic integrity in all aspects of the educational experience. Academic dishonesty in any form undermines this standard and devalues the original contributions of others. It is the responsibility of all members of the University community to actively uphold the integrity of the academy; failure to act, for any reason, is not acceptable. For information about plagiarism and academic misconduct, please visit https://www.une.edu/studentlife/plagiarism.
Academic dishonesty includes, but is not limited to the following:
Charges of academic dishonesty will be reviewed by the Program Director. Penalties for students found responsible for violations may depend upon the seriousness and circumstances of the violation, the degree of premeditation involved, and/or the student’s previous record of violations. Appeal of a decision may be made to the Dean whose decision will be final. Student appeals will take place through the grievance process outlined in the student handbook.
8 week: Students taking online graduate courses through the College of Professional Studies will be administratively dropped for non-participation if a graded assignment/discussion post is not submitted before Sunday at 11:59 pm ET of the first week of the term. Reinstatement is at the purview of the Dean's Office.
16 week: Students taking online graduate courses through the College of Professional Studies will be administratively dropped for non-participation if a graded assignment/discussion post is not submitted before Friday at 11:59 pm ET of the second week of the term. Reinstatement is at the purview of the Dean's Office.
The policies contained within this document apply to all students in the College of Professional Studies. It is each student's responsibility to know the contents of this handbook.
Please contact your student support specialist if you are considering dropping or withdrawing from a course. The last day to drop for 100% tuition refund is the 2nd day of the course. Financial Aid charges may still apply. Students using Financial Aid should contact the Financial Aid Office prior to withdrawing from a course.
The University of New England values academic integrity in all aspects of the educational experience. Academic dishonesty in any form undermines this standard and devalues the original contributions of others. It is the responsibility of all members of the University community to actively uphold the integrity of the academy; failure to act, for any reason, is not acceptable. For information about plagiarism and academic misconduct, please visit UNE Plagiarism Policies.
Academic dishonesty includes, but is not limited to the following:
Charges of academic dishonesty will be reviewed by the Program Director. Penalties for students found responsible for violations may depend upon the seriousness and circumstances of the violation, the degree of premeditation involved, and/or the student’s previous record of violations. Appeal of a decision may be made to the Dean whose decision will be final. Student appeals will take place through the grievance process outlined in the student handbook.