Syllabus

Master of Social Work

SSW 638 Multiculturalism and Social Work

Credits - 3

Description

This advanced course intends to develop a framework for understanding and respecting culturally diverse populations in which we work. This course establishes the foundation for the infusion of cultural diversity issues throughout the MSWO curriculum.
The initial premise of this course recognizes that North America is a multicultural society and asserts that competent social work practice cannot occur without understanding how diversity strengthens and enriches the practice of Social Work.

In this course we will look at oppression and marginalization and how it shapes various cultural norms and groups. This course is committed to dismantling all forms of oppression and marginalization; it will advance the practitioners lens and expand client-centered practice.

COURSE CONTENT:

This course prepares students to examine different theoretical and conceptual frameworks for practice with multicultural populations. Students develop a capacity for cultural self-assessment and a level of awareness of their own cultural limitations before examining diverse populations. Students examine the principles of a culturally sensitive system from the individual, organizational, community and practice level. The course focuses on theories of culture and inequality, and the help-seeking behaviors of multicultural groups. Special attention is given to self- awareness, values clarification, and ethnographic research as a tool for describing a group or culture and means for gaining a deeper understanding and appreciation of cultural diversity.

Materials

Required readings:

Lum, D. (2011). Culturally competent practice: A framework for understanding diverse groups and justice issues. (4th Edition). Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole

Journal readings:

A selection of journal articles and book chapters has been identified as required reading for the course. These will be posted on blackboard throughout the semester.

Learning Objectives and Outcomes

School of Social Work Program Outcomes:

Graduates of the UNE SSWO will demonstrate knowledge, skills, and leadership in the following:

  1. Demonstrates ethical and professional behavior.
  2. Advance human rights and social, racial, economic, and environmental justice.
  3. Engage in anti-racism, diversity, equity, and inclusion (ADEI) in practice.
  4. Engage in practice-informed research and research-informed practice.
  5. Engage in policy practice.
  6. Engage with individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities.
  7. Assess individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities.
  8. Intervene with individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities.
  9. Evaluate practice with individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities.

COURSE OBJECTIVES:

Upon completion of this course, class participants will be able to:

  1. Demonstrate knowledge of early childhood social science research, early brain development and adverse childhood experiences and their influence on children’s health including their social, emotional, relational and cognitive development; (Program Outcome 6)
  2. Demonstrate and apply knowledge of social policies and how they influence choice of practice models and interventions in practice with diverse adolescents, children and their families; (Program Outcomes 1, 3)
    Articulate and apply of a range of theories for practice with children, adolescents and families that are relational and empowering, and recognize interdependent and systemic aspects of child/family-centered interventions; (Program Outcomes 1, 3)
    Demonstrate ability to critically analyze theories and approaches used for child-centered assessments and interventions; (Program Outcomes 4, 6)
  3. Demonstrate knowledge and skills for building partnerships with families that are collaborative, empowering, and sustaining; (Program Outcomes: 3, 5)
  4. Articulate and apply reflexive and decision-making knowledge and skills to examine ethical dilemmas that arise when working with the conflicting needs of children and adults within families, and also the conflicting goals and priorities of families and social institutions; (Program Outcomes 4, 7)
  5. Demonstrate leadership and apply knowledge and skills for building community partnerships when working with children, adolescents and families across multi-level systems; (Program Outcome 5)
  6. Utilize Reflexivity including examination of belief systems, life experiences and assumptions that influence all aspects of practice with children, adolescents and families. (Program Outcomes 1, 7)

*The objective of this course is to raise the student’s own cultural identity as a practitioner and develop skills around their consciousness, as well as, the student’s awareness of clients’ cultural issues emanating from cultural oppression and inequality of access to power.

Assignments

LEARNING ACTIVITIES

A variety of learning activities are designed to support the course objectives, facilitate different learning styles, and build a community of learners. Learning activities for each module include the following:

Readings and Multimedia:

Description: This course will use an array of readings, videos, and films to present the important concepts in the various modules. The readings and multimedia provide the foundation and background for student discussion threads and written assignments.

Discussions:

Description: An important learning method in this course is student participation and interaction in the discussion threads within each module. Students are expected to participate actively and in a respectful manner. Please refer to Course Policies about participation for a full discussion of expectations.

Grading and Feedback Method: Grading methods are listed with each specific discussion assignment. Please refer to the Learning Modules and Discussion Boards for more information.

Quality Indicators

Critical thinking: Work that demonstrates the ability to evaluate and analyze ideas.

Conceptual ability: Work that demonstrates the ability to use theoretical concepts accurately and link it to logical and practical reasoning.

Communication and presentation in Blackboard: Work that demonstrates the ability to transmit ideas in a written form that is grammatically correct and properly formatted (sentence, paragraph, spelling, APA, etc.).

Assessments

The Multicultural Case Study

This represents the most significant assignment of the Multicultural Practice course. It is designed to allow students to immerse themselves into a group for intense study and learning. Students are encouraged to select oppressed and disenfranchised groups that they know little or nothing about and that reflect a population that they might encounter in their future social work practice. Students will be assigned to small groups to prepare this project. The project will allow students to select an issue and target population for exploration (e.g., health care disparities and African Americans, school drop-out rate with Latino youth, teen pregnancy with Caucasians). This paper will be a group project with a case study. A case study will be constructed by the group and will reflect the topic
of your target population. Please use the case chosen and reference it throughout the essay as it applies to the topic. Please also pick a topic that reflects an oppressed, socially excluded or marginalized group.

The group will use the Culturagram (diagram and podcast) as an outline/guide for their project. Students will draw from other material in the classroom discussion, text and journals articles and other multicultural materials. This paper should be written in APA format, in the third person, thinking critically as a group (practitioner) and be 10 pages plus reference and title page. Don’t forget to integrate theory with the case study chosen. This assignment will be worth 360 points of your overall grade.

Be sure to address the following in the essay:

  1. Literature review on the topic and its implications on Social Work Practice and the values/politics that are related to that;
  2. Description of context and its influence on the topic and case study;
  3. Assessment of the issue and research and how it impacts/applies to the case study;
  4. Group process of understanding the topic and how it relates to the case study;
  5. How will your group work for change if you were dealing with this in a Social Work capacity;
  6. What methods of advocacy and networking would you apply to this issue and case study. 

Example of a case study

Marcel is a 21-year-old African-American man, self-referred for inpatient treatment due to drug and alcohol abuse. He is currently unemployed, homeless, and has charges pending due to a number of “bounced” checks written over the past several months. Marcel reports that both of his parents were drug addicts and he experienced physical, sexual, and emotional abuse throughout childhood at their hands. His father died of liver disease at the age of 37. Marcel also reports that at the age of 14, he was kicked out of his family’s home because his father suspected that he was gay. Although they live in the same town, he has not had any contact with either parent for 7 years. Marcel describes his relationship with his older sister as “fair.” Marcel is not presently involved in a steady relationship, but does have a network of friends in the local gay community with whom he has been staying off and on. At the time that he left home, Marcel survived by becoming involved in sexual relationships with older men, many of whom were also abusive. He has had numerous sexual partners (both male and female) over the past 7 years, has traded sex for drugs and money, has had sex under the influence of drugs and alcohol, and has been made to have sex against his will. Marcel identifies himself as bisexual, not gay. Marcel first used alcohol at age 14, when he had his first sexual encounter with a man. He began using other drugs, including inhalants and marijuana by age 16 and amphetamines and cocaine by age 19. At 21, four months prior to entering treatment, he began using crack.

The Practitioner Sensitivity Paper (Reflexivity and Position)

Your final paper is to describe how you personally understand multicultural social work practice and reflect on how this is similar or different to the text and ideas explored in this course. Explain how you developed your understanding/ sensitivity of multicultural practice and why your definition makes sense and reflects how you will practice social work in the future. Explain how you anticipate being able, or not able, to use 8 multicultural practice in your future career (i.e. explore the strengths and limitations of the multicultural practice perspective from your perspective). This paper will be written in APA, in the first person, and be 5 pages plus a reference and a title page, integrating theory learned throughout the class. This assignment will be worth 400 points of your overall grade.

Grading Policy

The School of Social Work uses the following grading system for all courses with the exception of field education courses. Students are expected to maintain a “B” (3.0) average over the course of their study. Students with less than a GPA of 3.0 will be placed on academic probation. Students must have an overall GPA of 3.0 in order to receive their Master’s Degree.

Your grade in this course will be determined by the following criteria:

Grade Breakdown

AssignmentPoint ValuePercent of Final Rate
Weekly Discussions240 points (30 pts * 8 weeks)24%
Multicultural Project360 points36%
Practitioner Sensitivity Paper400 points40%

Grade Scale

Grade Points Grade Point Average (GPA)
A 94 – 100% 4.00
A- 90 – 93% 3.75
B+ 87 – 89% 3.50
B 84 – 86% 3.00
B- 80 – 83% 2.75
C+ 77 – 79% 2.50
C 74 – 76% 2.00
C- 70 – 73% 1.75
D 64 – 69% 1.00
F 00 – 63% 0.00

Schedule

Course Dates: May 4, 2016 through June 26, 2016

All assignments are to be submitted by 11:59PM EST on the dates listed below. Unless otherwise specified, all module discussions and assignments are due the last day of the module or unit week.

Module 1: Culturally Competent Perspectives
Week 1 | Dates: 05/04/16 – 05/10/16

  • Readings and multimedia: As assigned in module
  • Discussions: Two whole class discussions; Small group forum for project – ongoing
  • Assignment Introductions: The Multicultural Project (Due Week 4); The Practioner Sensitivity Paper (Due Week 7)

Week 2 | Dates: 05/11/16 – 05/17/16

  • Readings and multimedia: As assigned in module
  • Discussions: Group activity
  • Assignment: The Multicultural Project – continue working

Module 2: A Cultural Competence Framework
Week 3 | Dates: 05/18/16 – 05/24/16

  • Readings and multimedia: As assigned in module
  • Discussions: Whole class discussion on readings
  • Assignment: The Multicultural Project – continue working (due next week)

Week 4 | Dates: 05/25/16 – 05/31/16

  • Readings and multimedia: As assigned in module
  • Discussions: Small group discussion
  • Assignment due: The Multicultural Project Submission

Week 5 | Dates: 06/01/16 – 06/07/16

  • Readings and multimedia: As assigned in module
  • Activity: Power Flower
  • Assignment: The Practitioner Sensitivity Paper – continue working

Week 6 | Dates: 06/08/16 – 06/14/16

  • Readings and multimedia: As assigned in module
  • Discussion: small group
  • Assignment: The Practitioner Sensitivity Paper – continue working (due next week)

Module 3: Diverse Groups
Week 7 | Dates: 06/15/16 – 06/21/16

  • Readings and multimedia: As assigned in module
  • Discussion: Small group
  • Assignment due: Practitioner Sensitivity Paper Submission

Module 4: Experience of Oppression: Resilience in the Face of Domination
Week 8 | Dates: 06/22/16 – 06/26/16

  • Readings and multimedia: As assigned in module
  • Discussion: Course reflection

REMINDER: WEEK 8 is a SHORT WEEK which ENDS on Sunday.

Student Resources

Online Student Support

Your Student Support Specialist is a resource for you. Please don't hesitate to contact them for assistance, including, but not limited to course planning, current problems or issues in a course, technology concerns, or personal emergencies.

Questions? Visit the Student Support Social Work page

UNE Libraries:

Information Technology Services (ITS)

ITS Contact: Toll Free Help Desk 24 hours/7 days per week at 1-877-518-4673

Policies

Weekly Participation: Posts to the discussion board must add substantively to the discussion by building upon classmates’ ideas or posing critical questions to further the discussion. For example, a posting of “I agree with what people are saying” is not sufficient. I will be monitoring the participation on a weekly basis, and welcome people to check in with me if they have questions regarding their participation. Keep in mind that weekly posts make up a significant percentage of the final grade. All posts must be respectful. If at any time you are concerned with a posting, please notify me immediately. Please note that I encourage people to work in small groups to reflect and respond to the discussion questions. This is why some of the discussions in your learning modules indicate that they are small group discussions. Your instructor will randomly assign you to a small group at the start of class. This will be the group you work in throughout the course– where small group discussions occur. The majority of your discussions require a certain quality of critical thinking within the posts. Unless otherwise noted, you should post quality responses of no more than two to three paragraphs in length of the indicated quantity in any preferred combination related to the questions. The recommended method is that you carefully read the existing posts and then think about how to build off the existing ideas by offering additional insights, alternative perspectives, or raising critical questions. As part of this process, be sure to refer back to the original discussion question in order to keep the thread focused on the required topic and addresses the indicated question(s).

More specifically, many of the discussion requirements will say something along the lines of “submit two posts.” With this, one of the posts needs to be more substantive. For example, one of the posts provides an explanation of why you are raising the critical question or justifying/explaining the alternative perspective–within the context of the question. Then the second post should be a response to one of your classmates or instructor’s post to add additional insight or perspectives (refer to the Participation Rubric for guidance). Keep in mind: if the assignment has more specific criteria for completion, you should follow what is indicated. As a general rule, if you do not see
a quantity of posts indicated to a given discussion, you should always post a response to the question itself and a response to at least one of your classmates (per discussion) AS A MINIMUM. You should always follow the criteria listed in this section (Participation section of the Syllabus) as well as anything more specifically stated in the learning modules.

All posts to the discussion forums should be completed by Sunday @ 11:59 p.m. EST as indicated in the “Course Schedule.” Any discussions that extend beyond that date and time will not be considered a part of the grade and/or assignment, but rather optional reading. Even though you technically have until the last day of the module to post, your participation points will suffer if you do not post initially by Sunday as this negatively impacts your classmates’ ability to respond to your posts and your ability to respond to their posts. Posts that do not relate to the identified topic should be in one of the on-going discussion boards such as “Ask The Class”, “Hallway Discussions”, or “Resources”.

Late Policy: 5% each day will be deducted for assignments, which are late, if the instructor has not approved an extension in advance of the due date.

Essential Academic and Technical Standards

Please review the essential academic and technical standards of the University of New England School Social Work (SSW): https://online.une.edu/social-work/academic-and-technical-standards-une-online-ssw/

Turnitin Originality Check and Plagiarism Detection Tool

The College of Professional Studies uses Turnitin to help deter plagiarism and to foster the proper attribution of sources. Turnitin provides comparative reports for submitted assignments that reflect similarities in other written works. This can include, but is not limited to, previously submitted assignments, internet articles, research journals, and academic databases.

Make sure to cite your sources appropriately as well as use your own words in synthesizing information from published literature. Webinars and workshops, included early in your coursework, will help guide best practices in APA citation and academic writing.

You can learn more about Turnitin in the guide on how to navigate your Similarity Report.

Technology Requirements

Please review the technical requirements for UNE Online Graduate Programs: Technical Requirements

Confidentiality Statement

Student and faculty participation in this course will be governed by standards in the NASW Code of Ethics relating to confidentiality in sharing information from their placement sites and practice experiences. Students should be aware that personal information they choose to share in class, class assignments or conversations with faculty does not have the status of privileged information.

Late Policy

Assignments: Late assignments will be accepted up to 3 days late; however, there is a 10% grade reduction (from the total points) for the late submission. After three days the assignment will not be accepted.

Discussion posts: If the initial post is submitted late, but still within the discussion board week, there will be a 10% grade reduction from the total discussion grade (e.g., a 3 point discussion will be reduced by 0.3 points). Any posts submitted after the end of the Discussion Board week will not be graded.

Please make every effort ahead of time to contact your instructor and your student support specialist if you are not able to meet an assignment deadline. Arrangements for extenuating circumstances may be considered by faculty.