Homelessness is one of the most complex and intractable problems facing our communities today. Recent census data shows that at least 800,000 people can be homeless on any given day in the United States and at least 2.3 million people will experience homelessness at some time during an average year. Of that total, about half, or between 900,000 and 1.4 million, will be children who are homeless along with their families. The impact of homelessness on the individual and families is painful and traumatic. Responding to the needs of those who become homeless forms part of the core mission of many, if not most, human service organizations in our community. Addressing the problem of homelessness has become a priority in our national and state agendas and social workers often confront homelessness in a variety of practice contexts. For example, studies of young adults transitioning from the foster care system have shown that perhaps as many as 40% or more of those discharged from the foster care system will experience homelessness within the first five years following their discharge from placement. Similarly, approximately half of the typical emergency shelter population has a history of either some form of mental illness or substance abuse. The practice skills and competencies needed by social workers to be effective working within these multiple and complex practice contexts are varied and requires knowledge of community stakeholders, program models and their service delivery systems as well as the diversity of client systems.
This course explores the complex issues surrounding homelessness from multiple perspectives. From the perspective of the “lived experience” of homelessness and from the perspective of social policy, i.e. in terms of its historical, cultural, economic, political and legislative contexts. The course begins by putting a “face” on homelessness and defining homelessness in terms of demographic trends that distinguish different homeless subpopulations, e.g., “chronically homeless.” The course then examines homelessness by looking at key policy and legislative actions such as the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act that authorized funding for many if not most of the homeless services currently available in this country. Next, the course looks at the various types of program interventions and models currently being used to address homelessness, including emergency shelters, supportive housing and “rapid re-housing” models. In this same context, the course looks at the way homeless services are organized at the community level, the core agencies that provide coordination, oversight and accountability among various service providers and defines the service delivery network. Finally, the course looks at homelessness from a theoretical perspective and explores the way in which social theories such as “resiliency” have influenced the design and evaluation of homeless services using concepts of “vulnerability”, “self-sufficiency” and “risk.”
Written assignments include an analysis of the “Ten Year Plan to End Homelessness” adopted by their local town or state and prepare a final paper describing homelessness in their own community. In addition, students are required to prepare a five minute video presentation of a “testimony” prepared for a legislative hearing on some topic concerning homelessness. Finally, students consider the implications for social work practice and prepare an “advocacy plan” that details next steps they will take to pursue advocacy issues beyond the course and make their own impact upon homelessness.
Graduates of the UNE SSWO will demonstrate knowledge, skills, and leadership in the following:
Through the completion of their assignments, students will be able to:
A variety of learning activities are designed to support the course objectives, facilitate different learning styles, and build a community of learners. Learning activities for each module include the following: reading materials, podcasts, videos and interactive lectures.
Description: This course includes extensive reading materials as well as some videos and other materials.
Description: The course uses a policy framework to explore the phenomenon of homelessness along multiple dimensions and through this lens view the complexities of homelessness from a variety of perspectives, i.e., from the “lived experience” of homelessness, from the perspective of its historical, cultural, economic and political contexts, and from the various policy, legislative and judicial contexts that fund homeless services, determine their priorities and hold the system accountable. Discussion topics each week are framed around these dimensions.
Grading and Feedback Method: Grading and feedback methods are listed with each specific discussion assignment. Please refer to the rubrics provided in each Learning Modules and Discussion Boards for more information. The course facilitator will return any assignments and other grading items (discussion boards, participation, etc.) to students within three days of the assignment due date. The course facilitator will provide weekly feedback about participation and performance no later than four days after the learning module closes. Feedback can be via email, within the assignment itself, or using the Feedback column in the gradebook.
Description: Class Participation 18% of final grade, up to 30 points are possible weekly (over 6 weeks).
You will prepare a brief, but focused, 5-7 minute video (and an accompanying text (transcript) of that video) in which you will present “expert” testimony in the context of a legislative committee hearing on homelessness.
The focus for this presentation will be on some aspect of homelessness of your choosing, but it should be based upon your written assignment “Homelessness and its impact on my community”. You can use all or part of the paper as the basis of your presentation, however, the video presentation needs to focus on one of the following:
You will be graded on both the video and the feedback you will provide. In your feedback, follow the guidelines, make suggestions for improvement, and point out strong points and areas the presenter needs to expand. You are expected to complete 3 critiques, including self-assessment, in a timely fashion.
Description:
Critique the Ten Year Plan for your community. To complete the assignment you will need to either find the Ten Year Plan online for your community or you can download the sample Ten Year Plan for New Haven, CT. To find the Plan for your community, try conducting a web search or contact your local or regional Community Development Office for a copy of the Plan. To help guide you through the Plan, it is also advisable that you contact the Chairperson of the local “Continuum of Care” to obtain their perspective and insights into the unique issues facing your local community or region.
In this course you will prepare and submit a written paper that discusses some aspect of homelessness in your community. In it, you will describe homelessness in your local community. “Community” here is defined as your own city or town or your local region, e.g., “lower Fairfield County”.
Your paper should describe homelessness within your community along the multiple dimensions of homelessness we explore through our class discussions and presentations, e.g., general characteristics of homeless population, history, policy and legislative issues, program interventions, your own conclusions and your own summary evaluation of homeless services in your community. Try to be as specific as possible. To support your conclusions and add depth to your arguments, be certain to provide relevant data and evidence whenever possible and use citations where appropriate. The assignment should be six to seven pages in length.
You will summarize your learning over the past seven weeks and state what you think to be the implications for practice and what your next steps should be as an advocate for the homelessness in your community. Your journal entries and the readings this week should serve as your primary resources for this assignment.
You will keep a journal log and each week make an entry into the log that captures your own thoughts and reflections about the material covered in the class and our class discussions. What are the issues and challenges to homelessness? How do these issues impact upon your own community?
Due Dates: Due dates for all learning activities are provided in the “Course Schedule.”
Grade | Points Grade | Point Average (GPA) |
A | 94 – 100% | 4.00 |
A- | 90 – 93% | 3.75 |
B+ | 87 – 89% | 3.50 |
B | 84 – 86% | 3.00 |
B- | 80 – 83% | 2.75 |
C+ | 77 – 79% | 2.50 |
C | 74 – 76% | 2.00 |
C- | 70 – 73% | 1.75 |
D | 64 – 69% | 1.00 |
F | 00 – 63% | 0.00 |
All assignments are to be submitted by 11:59 p.m. E.S.T. on the dates listed below. Unless otherwise specified below, all module discussions and assignments are due the last day of the module or unit week.
Readings and Multimedia: web resources and articles as assigned
Discussions: 1 whole class forum
Assignments Due: Analysis of 10-yr Plan Submission, Weekly Journal
Your Student Support Specialist is a resource for you. Please don't hesitate to contact them for assistance, including, but not limited to course planning, current problems or issues in a course, technology concerns, or personal emergencies.
Questions? Visit the Student Support Social Work page
ITS Contact: Toll Free Help Desk 24 hours/7 days per week at 1-877-518-4673
Grading for class participation will be in accordance with the Discussion Participation grading rubric. The following are the guidelines and expectations for discussion participation in this course:
Timeliness: Unless otherwise instructed, the initial post is due by midnight Saturday and response is due by the end of the module. Late postings to the discussion forum after the module is ended will not be awarded a grade.
Content: Comments and responses posted in discussion are expected to be relevant and provide a “critical analysis” of the topical material on homelessness. In addition, comments should provide significant detail to support and statement or analysis, including relevant examples, evidence from the readings and other scholarly sources that might shed light upon the discussion issues. In general, “critical thinking” is the process of applying “reason” to a particular problem and analyzing, synthesizing, and evaluating information gathered from our observations and experience. At its best, “critical thinking” applies a set of well accepted intellectual values to the reasoning process, the values of clarity, accuracy, precision, consistency, relevance, evidence, depth and of analysis and fairness. Evidence of such values is expected to be found in the content of your discussion post and characterize your participation.
Peer Feedback and Interaction: Please respond to a minimum of 2 peers with substantial feedback. In your feedback, offer constructive critique, suggestions, in-depth questions, additional resources, and stimulating thoughts and/or probes. Postings to the discussion board must add substantively to the discussion by building upon classmates’ ideas or posing critical questions to further the discussion. A posting of “I agree with what people are saying” is not sufficient.
Academic Integrity and Quality: Source material must be properly paraphrased and/or cited and referenced in APA style. You are expected to write in complete sentences, your own words, use correct punctuation and spelling.
You are expected to participate in classroom discussions and demonstrate an understanding and integration of course material in your critical thinking and analysis.
Participation in weekly discussion provides an opportunity to explore new ideas and develop a capacity for critical thinking on the issues raised in this course. This is your opportunity to elaborate on your ideas, challenge your thinking and challenge the thinking of others. Think of it as your “sandbox” to explore, challenge, and reflect on the many practice issues that are raised here through your readings and discussion with peers. The success you establish in your professional career may depend on what you know but just as much it will depend upon your capacities to express what you know and communicate it effectively in the various practice contexts social workers work within.
Discussion participation will be monitored on a weekly basis, and you are welcome to check in with instructor if you have questions regarding participation. Keep in mind that weekly postings make up a significant percentage of the final grade.
Discussion Etiquette: All postings must be respectful. Postings which are inappropriate, inflammatory, or disrespectful will be deleted. Continued inappropriate postings may result in termination from the class and referral for additional disciplinary action within the school. If at any time you are concerned about a posting, please notify your instructor immediately.
Please refer to the Participation Rubric often.
In terms of effort, discussion participation is expected to conform to the following guidelines:
Please review the essential academic and technical standards of the University of New England School Social Work (SSW): https://online.une.edu/social-work/academic-and-technical-standards-une-online-ssw/
The College of Professional Studies uses Turnitin to help deter plagiarism and to foster the proper attribution of sources. Turnitin provides comparative reports for submitted assignments that reflect similarities in other written works. This can include, but is not limited to, previously submitted assignments, internet articles, research journals, and academic databases.
Make sure to cite your sources appropriately as well as use your own words in synthesizing information from published literature. Webinars and workshops, included early in your coursework, will help guide best practices in APA citation and academic writing.
You can learn more about Turnitin in the guide on how to navigate your Similarity Report.
Please review the technical requirements for UNE Online Graduate Programs: Technical Requirements
Student and faculty participation in this course will be governed by standards in the NASW Code of Ethics relating to confidentiality in sharing information from their placement sites and practice experiences. Students should be aware that personal information they choose to share in class, class assignments or conversations with faculty does not have the status of privileged information.
Assignments: Late assignments will be accepted up to 3 days late; however, there is a 10% grade reduction (from the total points) for the late submission. After three days the assignment will not be accepted.
Discussion posts: If the initial post is submitted late, but still within the discussion board week, there will be a 10% grade reduction from the total discussion grade (e.g., a 3 point discussion will be reduced by 0.3 points). Any posts submitted after the end of the Discussion Board week will not be graded.
Please make every effort ahead of time to contact your instructor and your student support specialist if you are not able to meet an assignment deadline. Arrangements for extenuating circumstances may be considered by faculty.