The MSW research sequence (SSW 503 and SSW 504) prepares students to become critical consumers as well as producers of research in order to inform their practice and contribute to social change. Students are exposed to research as a systematic problem identifying and problem solving process with parallels to other forms of social work practice where naming the issues to be addressed functions as a foundation for ongoing action planning. Enhanced critical thinking and conceptual skills are emphasized throughout. The relevance of fundamental social work values to social work and social science research is explored through attention to ethics, value conflicts, institutionalized bias and prejudice, validity and reliability of human observation, and critical comparison of various methods of knowing. The research sequence of the MSW program is composed of two 3-credit courses.
Research as a means to promote social change will be emphasized throughout the course sequence. This includes attention to creating empowering research processes and using research outcomes to advocate for social and economic justice. Research I (SSW 503) provides an orientation to the history of science and the range of methods for informing evidence-guided social work practice. Knowledge generation and its application to social work research will be examined critically from a paradigmatic level. Students will explore the continuous relationship between research, theory development, and practice principles and will develop an understanding of the context of research, ethics and values, use of research resources, problem formulation, measurement, sampling, and research design.
Graduates of the UNE SSWO will demonstrate knowledge, skills, and leadership in the following:
Course Objectives:
Upon successful completion of this course, the student will be able to:
This course is designed as a project-based course; therefore, you will complete a comprehensive project that will be submitted during week 8. To assist you in completing the project, additional assignments are developed that require your attention to meeting certain benchmarks throughout the course.
The reflective journal assignment provides an opportunity for students to free-write each week regarding their learning experiences, questions, and interpersonal reflections of course content. Free writing is relaxing and allows the mind to process events and learning experiences that have occurred in light of new information obtained or interactions with others, via the course room or outside of the course room (field practicum, work, home, volunteering, etc.). The key component of this assignment is to include 2-3 paragraphs each week reflecting on the educational experience of this course.
Overview – This written assignment provides you the opportunity to discuss the linkages between scientific methods of inquiry and social work practice. To complete this assignment, your will reflect on a social service setting that you are familiar with. This can be a place of current or previous employment, where you volunteer, or where you or a member.
Conduct a brief literature review on this setting (or topic of the setting) and discuss an area within the setting that could benefit from employing methods of scientific inquiry (research methods). To do this, discuss an area within the setting that you feel is of concern and articulate how scientific methods of inquiry can impact social work practice within the setting you chose.
Expectations
Overview – Review the topic, research questions and/or hypotheses you formulated in Week 1. Conduct a literature review (within the last 5-10 years of publication) on this topic. Identify and discuss themes, patterns, and gaps that exist in the literature on the selected topic. Compose a 4-6 page paper in APA 6th edition formatting in which you use the literature to establish a framework on the selected topic. Please note that this is not a report on what each article states, rather critically analyzes the findings, limitations, strengths, and potential opportunities of the published work. Submit this assignment to the Assignment Dropbox by Day 7 of Week 4.
Paper Components –
Expectations
Overview – Review the topic, research questions and/or hypotheses you formulated in Week 1. Review the literature review conducted in Week 4. Create a 10-question survey designed to further research the selected topic. Submit this assignment to the Assignment Dropbox by Day 7 of Week 6.
Survey Components –
Expectations –
Overview – Review the topic, research questions and/or hypotheses you formulated in Week 1. Review the literature review completed in Week 4. Review the survey you created in Week 6. At this point of the course, you are familiar with your selected topic, created a research question and/or hypotheses, identified reasons that additional research should be conducted, and created a survey instrument. The next step of the research process is to provide the details of your Methods. Compose of 4-6 page paper following APA 6th edition formatting and propose your research design (otherwise known as the “Methodology”). Discuss your participants, instruments, and procedures. Submit this assignment to the Assignment Dropbox by Day 7 of Week 7.
Paper Components –
Expectations –
Additional Notes – Please refer to the “Methodology Template” provided in the “Resources” section of your discussion board area. This template provides a sample of the levels of headings that should be used for this document.
Overview – Review the topic, research questions and/or hypotheses you formulated in Week 1. Review the literature review completed in Week 4. Review the survey you created in Week 6. Review the methods completed in Week 7. Upon completion of this Module, you will have created a research study proposal! You completed Chapter 2 (the Literature Review) and Chapter 3 (Methods), all that is left is Chapter 1, known as the Introduction. Write your introduction chapter (2-3 pages) following APA 6th edition formatting where you discuss the scope and significance of the selected topic and then combine all components of the proposal into one document for final submission. Submit this assignment to the Assignment Dropbox by Day 3 of Week 8.
Paper Components –
Introduction Expectations –
Final Proposal Expectations (to be submitted by Day 3 of Week 8)
Discussion Board: The entire collection of discussions in the main course room.
Discussion Forum: The individual forum (venue) for each question.
Discussion Question: The actual question within the discussion forum.
Each week there are three discussion questions within the main classroom discussion board area. The #1 discussion forum requires an initial response by the end of Friday, midnight, ET and #2 and #3 discussion forum require an initial response by Sunday, midnight, ET. However, feel free to post your work earlier in the learning week if you choose.
First Discussion Forum: This discussion forum is scholarly in nature and requires an initial response from you to the discussion board by Friday, midnignt, ET. APA format and at least 2 citations are required.
Second Discussion Forum: This discussion forum is also scholarly in nature, but focuses on social work ethics, empowerment, health, and program vision and niche. This discussion question may be in the form of an activity. An initial response from you to the discussion board is due by Sunday, midnight, ET. APA format and at least 2 citations are required.
Third Discussion Forum: This discussion forum is informal in presentation and focuses on practice and application of research methods. This discussion question may be in the form of an activity. No APA or in-text citations are required.
Remember (#1 and #2 Discussion Forums)!
What are responses?
Responses are posts that demonstrate that you are responding to another student. These are generally what you think of as “participation” posts. You are expected to actively participate in the forums each week. To actively participate in the forums means to respond to a minimum of 2 different students (in each forum) per week. This will calculate as 6 replies each week, minimum. Your initial posting does not count towards responses to others.
Note: DO NOT post all of your participation replies on the last day of the week! Doing so does not facilitate student-to-student interaction and minimizes the learning experience for all! Your instructor may choose to reduce points given if you post all replies on the same day.
Responses to others must add substantively to the discussion by building upon classmates’ ideas or posing critical questions to further the discussion. For example, a posting of “I agree with what people are saying” is not sufficient. What is considered sufficient is initiating further discussion; promoting further thought; providing critical or integrative dialogue; providing affective support or encouragement; challenging by showing supporting literature or other documentation, and/or self-reflecting regarding the topic. An ideal response to another student looks like:
Example Response
Student Name,
I appreciated reading your initial post this week as you highlight many of the difficulties in approaching research from a qualitative perspective. However, in their work, Jones (2011) notes that qualitative research is an approach to gathering data that is both inquisitive and challenging. Moreover, what I respect about the process of qualitative inquiry is that in-depth and personally significant questions or inquiry can be asked. Do you agree or disagree with Jones’s (2011) statement that qualitative research is both inquisitive and challenging…and what would you say is the difference between qualitative and quantitative inquiry? Thoughts?
Regards,
My Name
References:
Jones, B. (2011). Qualitative approaches to data collection. Journal of Qualitative Research, 12(2), 334-354.
You will be graded each week according to your initial postings as well as the quality and quantity of your participation. Your instructor will grade both your discussion forum initial postings and participation based on their own discretion. Please check with your instructor the first few days of class to become fully aware of any further expectations not already noted in the Course Syllabus.
The School of Social Work uses the following grading system for all courses with the exception of field education courses. Students are expected to maintain a “B” (3.0) average over the course of their study. Students with less than a GPA of 3.0 will be placed on academic probation. Students must have an overall GPA of 3.0 in order to receive their Master’s Degree.
Your grade in this course will be determined by the following criteria:
Assignment | Points | % of Grade |
---|---|---|
Discussion Questions | 100 points (12 points x 8 Weeks, Week 1 includes 16 points) | 10% |
Participation | 100 points (12.5 points x 8 Weeks) | 10%n |
What Does ResearchnLook Like in the RealnWorld?n(Due Week 3) | 100 points | 10% |
Literature Reviewn(Due Week 4) | 150 points | 15% |
Survey Questionsn(Due Week 6) | 100 points | 10% |
Methodologyn(Due Week 7) | 150 points | 15% |
Final Proposal WithnSurveyn(Due Week 8) | 200 points | 20% |
Reflective Journal | 100 pointsn(12.5 points X 8 weeks) | 10% |
Total: | 1,000 points | 100% |
Grade | Points Grade | Point Average (GPA) |
A | 94 – 100% | 4.00 |
A- | 90 – 93% | 3.75 |
B+ | 87 – 89% | 3.50 |
B | 84 – 86% | 3.00 |
B- | 80 – 83% | 2.75 |
C+ | 77 – 79% | 2.50 |
C | 74 – 76% | 2.00 |
C- | 70 – 73% | 1.75 |
D | 64 – 69% | 1.00 |
F | 00 – 63% | 0.00 |
Your Student Support Specialist is a resource for you. Please don't hesitate to contact them for assistance, including, but not limited to course planning, current problems or issues in a course, technology concerns, or personal emergencies.
Questions? Visit the Student Support Social Work page
ITS Contact: Toll Free Help Desk 24 hours/7 days per week at 1-877-518-4673
Please review the essential academic and technical standards of the University of New England School Social Work (SSW): https://online.une.edu/social-work/academic-and-technical-standards-une-online-ssw/
The College of Professional Studies uses Turnitin to help deter plagiarism and to foster the proper attribution of sources. Turnitin provides comparative reports for submitted assignments that reflect similarities in other written works. This can include, but is not limited to, previously submitted assignments, internet articles, research journals, and academic databases.
Make sure to cite your sources appropriately as well as use your own words in synthesizing information from published literature. Webinars and workshops, included early in your coursework, will help guide best practices in APA citation and academic writing.
You can learn more about Turnitin in the guide on how to navigate your Similarity Report.
Please review the technical requirements for UNE Online Graduate Programs: Technical Requirements
Student and faculty participation in this course will be governed by standards in the NASW Code of Ethics relating to confidentiality in sharing information from their placement sites and practice experiences. Students should be aware that personal information they choose to share in class, class assignments or conversations with faculty does not have the status of privileged information.
Assignments: Late assignments will be accepted up to 3 days late; however, there is a 10% grade reduction (from the total points) for the late submission. After three days the assignment will not be accepted.
Discussion posts: If the initial post is submitted late, but still within the discussion board week, there will be a 10% grade reduction from the total discussion grade (e.g., a 3 point discussion will be reduced by 0.3 points). Any posts submitted after the end of the Discussion Board week will not be graded.
Please make every effort ahead of time to contact your instructor and your student support specialist if you are not able to meet an assignment deadline. Arrangements for extenuating circumstances may be considered by faculty.