Syllabus

Master of Science in Education

EDU 740: Supporting Literacy Development for All Learners – Summer B 2016

Credits - 3

Description

This course will address the foundational knowledge that teachers of literacy need in order to understand the reading and writing process for students. In this course, teachers will be exposed to major theories, research, and best practices in the literacy field. Teachers will be asked to draw upon this theoretical and practical knowledge to think about issues of instructional practice. Through engaging inquiry experiences, teachers will become active participants in developing a strong foundational base for literacy instruction for all learners in their classrooms.

 

A required course in the MSEd with a concentration in Literacy program or Reading Specialist program or may be taken as a Certificate of Advanced Graduate Studies

Will be delivered asynchronously on-line

Materials

Sousa, D. (2014). How the Brain Learns to Read. (2nd Ed). Corwin: CA.

Articles to be assigned throughout the term (and will be posted in Blackboard)

Learning Objectives and Outcomes

Overall Course Objectives

(module specific objectives will be specified throughout the course)

Course Objectives

For each course in this program there are overall program goals. Below is a chart of how the overall program goals match the key assessments for this course. In addition, in each module there are smaller learning objectives. These will be specified at the beginning of each week’s introduction along with how these match the broader program goals.

Course Objectives Student Learning Outcome Key Assignments IRA Standards for Reading Professionals

Connection   to INTASC

Students will articulate foundational knowledge about literacy instruction as it relates to reading development, differentiation, and motivation. Students will demonstrate their understanding of the foundation of reading by completing a quiz. Students will read research articles and summarize main points for others in their group. Quiz 1, 2, & 3Research Jig Saw Standard One: Foundational Knowledge Standard 4 (j,k,l,m,n)
Students will select and implement instructional approaches based on evidence-based rationale, student needs, and purposes for instruction. Students will demonstrate that they can create instruction based on the principles of learning to read by creating an Instructional Connection Showcase. Instructional Connection Standard Two: Curriculum and Instruction Standard 10(f,g,h)NETS-T Standard 5Standard 3
Students will explore the role of creating a literate which environment supports literacy development for all students. Students will synthesize material from various sources to make recommendations and engage in discussion based on a case study. Case Study Standard Three: Literate Environment Standard 5(a, c, f I, k, n,o)Standard 8(a,e,g,h,j,k,l,m,n,o)
Students will be active and contributing members of a learning community to learn new content and further understanding about the foundation of literacy for all students. Students will create a timeline marking moments of their own learning development as a foundation for learning. Students will engage in a discussion where they synthesize their learning from the chapter. DiscussionPersonal Timeline   Standard 10(a,b,d,e,f,g I, )

Assignments

Timeline of Your own Literacy Development (10 Points)

In this class we will be covering the foundation of literacy development. For this first assignment you will be asked to create a timeline documenting some significant moments in your own personal literacy development. You will be sharing this with others in order to establish a learning community. You will also be drawing upon this reflection as you learn about how children learn to read and write.

Quizzes 3 quizzes each at 5 points (15 Points)

There will be three quizzes during this course. The first two quizzes will cover foundational knowledge and terms that you need to know when discussing early reading and language development. The third quiz will be more practical based. These quizzes are meant to mirror the types of questions that you would see on PRAXIS or licensing exams to test your knowledge. They are a good opportunity for you to demonstrate what you have learned in a more objective fashion (and mirror the types of assessment that we often require of our students).

Discussions   2 each at 4 Points (8 Points)

You will work in grade level groups to discuss the text and class material. An expectation guide will be provided. This is an opportunity to share your reading and experiences while also considering your classmates’ thoughts and viewpoints. These class discussions are a wonderful way to process information and deepen our learning.

Case Study    2 each at 10 points (20 Points)

The case studies are designed to help you think more deeply about a literacy concept. Each case study has multiple parts that will engage you in working through a literacy issue. You will be working in your group to complete the case study. Each case study will last one week. A specific case study description will be found in the Learning Activities folder of the module where you will be engaging in this case study.

Instructional Connections  (22 Points)

While it is imperative that we understand the foundation of literacy development, our job as teachers is to take this knowledge and then create meaningful learning experiences for our students. In this assignment you will be asked to take what you are learning and share how you would use this knowledge to plan instruction. You will be given an assignment description and will share this with the whole class.

Research Jig-Saw (25 Points)

This assignment is based on a jig-saw technique where learning is distributed amongst group members and then shared in different groups. You will be members of two groups—an Expert Group- where you will share similar content, and Your Grade Level group where you will share what you have learned with others who have taken on different articles.

Grading Policy

Your grade in this course will be determined by the following criteria:

Grade Breakdown

AssignmentPoint Value (total 100 points)
Timeline10
Quizzes15
Discussions8
Case Study20
Instructional Connection22
Research Jig-Saw25

Grade Scale

Grade Points Grade Point Average (GPA)
A 94 – 100% 4.00
A- 90 – 93% 3.75
B+ 87 – 89% 3.50
B 84 – 86% 3.00
B- 80 – 83% 2.75
C+ 77 – 79% 2.50
C 74 – 76% 2.00
C- 70 – 73% 1.75
D 64 – 69% 1.00
F 00 – 63% 0.00

Schedule

Use this template for planning purposes- it will help you see when things are due and what topics will be covered. Actual dates will be posted in the Course Calendar. More detailed description of each module will be found in the course.

Module Topic Learning Activities Assessment Due Dates
1 Establishing a learning community

Reflecting on our own reading and writing development

  • Create a timeline
  • Share this timeline with classmates
  • Respond to each other’s timelines

Personal Literacy Timeline 

Sunday, July 3

2 How do we learn spoken language?
  • Read Sousa Chapter One (1)
  • Participate in grade level discussion

Discussion

Sunday, July 10

3 How do we learn to read?
  • Read Sousa Chapter Two (2)
  • Take Quiz

Quiz #1- the basics 

Sunday, July 17

4 How do we teach reading?
  • Read Sousa Chapter Three (3)
  • Participate in grade level discussion

Discussion 

Sunday, July 24

5 How do we teach reading?
  • Read Sousa Chapter Four (4)
  • Share Instructional Connections
  • Review Phonics Webqest
  • Take Quiz

Instructional Connection 

Quiz #2- Phonics 

Sunday, July 31

6 How do we recognize reading problems? Read Sousa Chapter Five (5)

Case Study #1 

Sunday, August 7

7 What does the research say about the foundations of literacy? Read selected articles (provided in Blackboard)

Research Jig Saw 

Sunday, August 14

8 How do we put it all together to support all students? Read Sousa Chapter Six (6)

Case Study #2 

Quiz #3 

Friday, August 19

Student Resources

Accommodations

Any student who would like to request, or ask any questions regarding, academic adjustments or accommodations must contact the Student Access Center at (207) 221-4438 or pcstudentaccess@une.edu. Student Access Center staff will evaluate the student's documentation and determine eligibility of accommodation(s) through the Student Access Center registration procedure.

Policies

Attendance Policy

Online students are required to submit a graded assignment/discussion prior to Sunday evening at 11:59 pm ET of the first week of the term. If a student does not submit a posting to the graded assignment/discussion prior to Sunday evening at 11:59 pm ET, the student will be automatically dropped from the course for non-participation. Review the full attendance policy.

Late Policy

Assignments: Late assignments will be accepted up to 3 days late; however, there is a 10% grade reduction (from the total points) for the late submission. After three days the assignment will not be accepted.

Discussion posts: If the initial post is submitted late, but still within the discussion board week, there will be a 10% grade reduction from the total discussion grade (e.g., a 3 point discussion will be reduced by 0.3 points). Any posts submitted after the end of the Discussion Board week will not be graded.

Please make every effort ahead of time to contact your instructor and your student support specialist if you are not able to meet an assignment deadline. Arrangements for extenuating circumstances may be considered by faculty.

Student Handbook Online - Policies and Procedures

The policies contained within this document apply to all students in the College of Graduate and Professional Studies. It is each student's responsibility to know the contents of this handbook.

UNE Online Student Handbook

UNE Course Withdrawal

Please contact your student support specialist if you are considering dropping or withdrawing from a course. The last day to drop for 100% tuition refund is the 2nd day of the course. Financial Aid charges may still apply. Students using Financial Aid should contact the Financial Aid Office prior to withdrawing from a course.

Academic Integrity

The University of New England values academic integrity in all aspects of the educational experience. Academic dishonesty in any form undermines this standard and devalues the original contributions of others. It is the responsibility of all members of the University community to actively uphold the integrity of the academy; failure to act, for any reason, is not acceptable. For information about plagiarism and academic misconduct, please visit UNE Plagiarism Policies.

Academic dishonesty includes, but is not limited to the following:

  1. Cheating, copying, or the offering or receiving of unauthorized assistance or information.
  2. Fabrication or falsification of data, results, or sources for papers or reports.
  3. Action which destroys or alters the work of another student.
  4. Multiple submissions of the same paper or report for assignments in more than one course without permission of each instructor.
  5. Plagiarism, the appropriation of records, research, materials, ideas, or the language of other persons or writers and the submission of them as one's own.

Charges of academic dishonesty will be reviewed by the Program Director. Penalties for students found responsible for violations may depend upon the seriousness and circumstances of the violation, the degree of premeditation involved, and/or the student’s previous record of violations.  Appeal of a decision may be made to the Dean whose decision will be final.  Student appeals will take place through the grievance process outlined in the student handbook.