Syllabus

Master of Science in Education

EDU 724: Collaboration in Inclusion Settings – Summer A 2021

Credits - 3

Description

Students will complete co-teaching experiences in inclusion settings. Activities are tailored to ensure field application of concepts, models, practices, and skills as students apply effective co-teaching instructional practices, participate in interdisciplinary planning meetings, and collaborate as team members. These co-teaching experiences reinforce the acquisition of ethics inclusive classrooms, plan and implement teaching and learning activities, research and reflect on practices, and work collaboratively with educational teams. Some course requirements may be modified during summer sessions for participants without access to students during summer school breaks.

Materials

Required

Friend, M. P. (2019). Co-teach!: Building and sustaining effective classroom partnerships in inclusive schools. Marilyn Friend, Inc.

Additional resources will be provided within the course.

Supplemental

American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association. 7th ed. American Psychological Association. (ISBN 978-1433832154, ISBN 978-1433832161, E-text ISBN 978-1433832185). Available from the UNE Library in print on both campuses in the Reference collections.

Learning Objectives and Outcomes

This course is aligned with INTASC Standard Model Core Teaching Standards and CEC Special Educator Preparation Standards

Students will:

  • Implement current research and best practices related to  co-teaching (INTASC 1, 2, 4, 8; CEC 5.0, 6.2, 7.1)
  • Apply researched best practices in collaboration and communication to diverse student populations in an  inclusive learning environment (INTASC 2, 3, 7, 9, 10; CEC 1.2, 3.1, 6.3, 7.1)
  • Design instructional strategies for students with disabilities within an inclusive learning environment (INTASC 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7; CEC 5.0)
  • Evaluate instructional strategies for students with disabilities within an inclusive learning environment (INTASC 7, 8, 9; 2.1)
  • Collaborate with other professional educators in order to construct solutions to common challenges related to co-teaching (INTASC 2, 3, 9 10; CEC 2.1, 6.6, 7.2, 7.3)
  • Apply IEP accommodations to a lesson plan designed for an inclusive learning environment (INTASC 3, 9. 10; CEC 3.3, 5.1, 5.5)
  • Recommend professional individual and schoolwide development for the support of inclusion education (INTASC 1, 9, 10; CEC 6.2, 6.4, 6.5)

Assignments

Class and Group Discussions

Discussions provide you with an opportunity to synthesize course readings and research while learning from professional peers. Post an original response to the prompt, and respond to posts made by at least two classmates.

Co-Teaching Partnership Analysis Assignment

For this assignment, you will utilize a variety of self-reflection tools as you take a closer look at your own strengths and weaknesses in professional collaborative relationships including co-teaching.

Sequential Lesson Plan and Justification

In this assignment, you will create a set of three sequential lesson plans and write a statement of justification to demonstrate your learning about different co-teaching models. Your lesson must utilize at least two of the following co-teaching approaches in your plans: parallel teaching, team teaching, station teaching, alternative teaching.

Interviews, Visual Representation and Summary

For this assignment, you will interview at least three individuals from a range of stakeholders (administrator, teacher, speech/language clinician, occupational therapist, classroom teacher, or special educator) in your building to determine their perceptions of co-teaching. You will synthesize your interview results, and communicate your findings visually. Finally, you will write a 2-3 page essay that summarizes and reflects on your interview findings and makes recommendations for future professional development to support inclusion.

Case Study

Your task for this assignment is to apply a student IEP to an existing  inclusive lesson plan. You will present your accommodations in a 3-5 page essay in which you discuss how you will integrate this new student into your class, providing best-practice research to support your major points.

Needs Assessment & Proposal

For this assignment, you will write a 3-4 page proposal for inclusive education in your school that you can submit to your building principal or for a larger audience, such as a school board or administrative team. Your task for this assignment is to identify the current capacity of your school, your classroom, and yourself to meet the needs of students with learning differences, whether they are identified as Special Education, are ELL, or require additional supports in order to be successful. As a part of this process, you must envision the ideal school and classroom situation. What would an optimal program look like to you? Then, using the evidence you have gathered in previous weeks about your school, your collaborative strengths and needs, and your individual strengths and needs, you will make a plan to reach this optimum level.

Grading Policy

Your grade in this course will be determined by the following criteria:

Grade Breakdown

AssignmentsPoints
Weekly Discussions (7 X 4 Points Each)28
Co-Teaching Partnership Analysis12
Sequential Lesson Plans and Justification12
Interviews, Visual Representation and Summary12
Case Study12
Needs Assessment and Proposal24
Total100

Grade Scale

Grade Points Grade Point Average (GPA)
A 94 – 100% 4.00
A- 90 – 93% 3.75
B+ 87 – 89% 3.50
B 84 – 86% 3.00
B- 80 – 83% 2.75
C+ 77 – 79% 2.50
C 74 – 76% 2.00
C- 70 – 73% 1.75
D 64 – 69% 1.00
F 00 – 63% 0.00

Schedule

 

Learning Module

Topic

Reading and Assignments

Due Dates

Week 1

4/28 – 5/2

Introduction to Co-Teaching

Reading:

Friend, M. P. (2019), Ch. 1 & 2

Assignment:

Class Discussion (Post initial response to the discussion by Friday)

11:59 PM ET on Sunday

 

During this initial shortened week, please post your initial response by Friday

Week 2

5/3 – 5/9

The Co-Teaching Partnership

Reading:

Friend, M. P. (2019), Ch. 3

Sacks, A. (2014). Eight tips for making the most of co-teaching. Education Week Teacher.

Assignments:

Group Discussion

Co-Teaching Partnership Analysis Assignment

11:59 PM ET on Sunday

Post your initial response to the discussion prompt by Wednesday

Week 3

5/10 – 5/16

Co-Teaching Approaches

Reading:

Friend, M. P. (2019), Chapter 4

Anderson, Kelly M.

Differentiating instruction to include all students. Preventing School Failure.  51(3).

Preszler, J. (Ed.) (2006). On target: strategies that differentiate instruction grades 4-12. Black Hills Special Services Cooperative.

Raffaelli, L. (2014). 18 teacher-tested strategies for differentiated instruction. Edutopia

Assignments:

Group Discussion

Sequential Lesson Plan and Justification

11:59 PM ET on Sunday

Post your initial response to the discussion prompt by Wednesday

Week 4

5/17 – 5/23

Quality Co-Teaching

Reading:

Friend, M. P. (2019), Chapters 5 and 6

Assignment Resources:

Karbach, M. (2014). 5 Good tools to create charts, graphs, and diagrams for your class. Educational Technology and Mobile Learning.

Rensch, M. (2013). 10 tools for creating infographics and visualizations.

Assignments:

Group Discussion

Interviews, Visual Representation and Summary

11:59 PM ET on Sunday

Post your initial response to the discussion prompt by Wednesday

Week 5

5/24 – 5/30

Collaboration with Para-

professionals

Reading:

Friend, M. P. (2019), Chapter 7

Carnahan, C., Williamson, P., Clarke, L. & Sorensen, R. (2009). A systematic approach for supporting paraeducators in educational settings: A guide for teachers. Teaching Exceptional Children. 41(5). pp. 34-43

Assignment:

Group Discussion: Interview of a Paraprofessional

11:59 PM ET on Sunday

Post your initial response to the discussion prompt by Wednesday

Week 6

5/31 – 6/6

Understanding the Child

Reading:

Rebhorn, T. (2017). Developing your child’s IEP. Center for Parent Information and Resources.

American Psychological Association. Reasonable accommodations explained. (2017).

Assignments:

Group Discussion

Case Study

11:59 PM ET on Sunday

Post your initial response to the discussion prompt by Wednesday

Week 7

6/7 – 6/13

Collaborative Education

Reading:

Friend, M. P. (2019), Chapter 8

Murawski, W. & Dieker, L. (2008). 50 Ways to keep your co-teacher: Strategies for before, during and after co-teaching. Teaching Exceptional Children. 40 (4).

Assignment:

Needs Assessment & Proposal Assignment

11:59 PM ET on Sunday

Week 8

6/14 – 6/20

Proposal Feedback

Assignment:

Class Discussion

11:59 PM ET on FRIDAY

Post your initial response to the discussion prompt by Wednesday

 

Student Resources

Online Student Support

Your Student Support Specialist is a resource for you. Please don't hesitate to contact them for assistance, including, but not limited to course planning, current problems or issues in a course, technology concerns, or personal emergencies.

Questions? Visit the Student Support Education page

UNE Libraries:

UNE Student Academic Success Center

The Student Academic Success Center (SASC) offers a range of services to support your academic achievement, including tutoring, writing support, test prep and studying strategies, learning style consultations, and many online resources. To make an appointment for tutoring, writing support, or a learning specialist consultation, go to une.tutortrac.com. To access our online resources, including links, guides, and video tutorials, please visit:

Information Technology Services (ITS)

  • ITS Contact: Toll Free Help Desk 24 hours/7 days per week at 1-877-518-4673

Accommodations

Any student who would like to request, or ask any questions regarding, academic adjustments or accommodations must contact the Student Access Center at (207) 221-4438 or pcstudentaccess@une.edu. Student Access Center staff will evaluate the student's documentation and determine eligibility of accommodation(s) through the Student Access Center registration procedure.

Policies

Turnitin Originality Check and Plagiarism Detection Tool

The College of Professional Studies uses Turnitin to help deter plagiarism and to foster the proper attribution of sources. Turnitin provides comparative reports for submitted assignments that reflect similarities in other written works. This can include, but is not limited to, previously submitted assignments, internet articles, research journals, and academic databases.

Make sure to cite your sources appropriately as well as use your own words in synthesizing information from published literature. Webinars and workshops, included early in your coursework, will help guide best practices in APA citation and academic writing.

You can learn more about Turnitin in the Turnitin Student quick start guide.

Technology Requirements

Please review the technical requirements for UNE Online Graduate Programs: Technical Requirements

Course Evaluation Policy

Course surveys are one of the most important tools the University of New England uses for evaluating the quality of your education, and for providing meaningful feedback to instructors on their teaching. In order to assure that the feedback is both comprehensive and precise, we need to receive it from each student for each course. Evaluation access is distributed via UNE email at the beginning of the last week of the course.

Information Technology Services (ITS)

ITS Contact: Toll Free Help Desk 24 hours/7 days per week at 1-877-518-4673

Attendance Policy

Online students are required to submit a graded assignment/discussion prior to Sunday evening at 11:59 pm ET of the first week of the term. If a student does not submit a posting to the graded assignment/discussion prior to Sunday evening at 11:59 pm ET, the student will be automatically dropped from the course for non-participation. Review the full attendance policy.

Late Policy

Assignments: Late assignments will be accepted up to 3 days late; however, there is a 10% grade reduction (from the total points) for the late submission. After three days the assignment will not be accepted.

Discussion posts: If the initial post is submitted late, but still within the discussion board week, there will be a 10% grade reduction from the total discussion grade (e.g., a 3 point discussion will be reduced by 0.3 points). Any posts submitted after the end of the Discussion Board week will not be graded.

Please make every effort ahead of time to contact your instructor and your student support specialist if you are not able to meet an assignment deadline. Arrangements for extenuating circumstances may be considered by faculty.

Student Handbook Online - Policies and Procedures

The policies contained within this document apply to all students in the College of Graduate and Professional Studies. It is each student's responsibility to know the contents of this handbook.

UNE Online Student Handbook

UNE Course Withdrawal

Please contact your student support specialist if you are considering dropping or withdrawing from a course. The last day to drop for 100% tuition refund is the 2nd day of the course. Financial Aid charges may still apply. Students using Financial Aid should contact the Financial Aid Office prior to withdrawing from a course.

Academic Integrity

The University of New England values academic integrity in all aspects of the educational experience. Academic dishonesty in any form undermines this standard and devalues the original contributions of others. It is the responsibility of all members of the University community to actively uphold the integrity of the academy; failure to act, for any reason, is not acceptable. For information about plagiarism and academic misconduct, please visit UNE Plagiarism Policies.

Academic dishonesty includes, but is not limited to the following:

  1. Cheating, copying, or the offering or receiving of unauthorized assistance or information.
  2. Fabrication or falsification of data, results, or sources for papers or reports.
  3. Action which destroys or alters the work of another student.
  4. Multiple submissions of the same paper or report for assignments in more than one course without permission of each instructor.
  5. Plagiarism, the appropriation of records, research, materials, ideas, or the language of other persons or writers and the submission of them as one's own.

Charges of academic dishonesty will be reviewed by the Program Director. Penalties for students found responsible for violations may depend upon the seriousness and circumstances of the violation, the degree of premeditation involved, and/or the student’s previous record of violations.  Appeal of a decision may be made to the Dean whose decision will be final.  Student appeals will take place through the grievance process outlined in the student handbook.