Syllabus

Doctor of Education in Educational Leadership (Ed.D.)

EDU 813 The Politics of Change – Spring A 2018

Credits - 3

Description

Effective transformative leaders understand and address the dynamics, whether positive or negative forces, affecting change efforts in their respective settings. The course engages candidates in examining issues of power, conflict, negotiation, and compromise. Emphasis is placed upon how best to introduce and advance innovation by maximizing collaboration and minimizing opposition. 

Materials

Required Materials (textbooks, articles, web-based media)

Bloomberg, L. & Volpe, M. (2016). Completing your qualitative dissertation. (2nd ed.) SAGE Publications. (You are welcome to use the previous edition)

Coughlan, D. & Brannick, T. (2014). Doing action research in your own organization. (3rd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.      (You are welcome to use a previous edition)

Creswell, J. W. (2015). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. (5th ed.) Boston, MA: Pearson.     (You are welcome to use a previous edition)

Ravitch, A. & Riggan, M. (2016). Reason and rigor: How conceptual frameworks guide research. (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Roberts, C. (2010). The dissertation journey. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Supplemental Texts

Anfera, V. & Anfera, N. (2015). Theoretical frameworks in qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Boote, D. & Beile, P. (2005). Scholars before researchers: On the centrality of the dissertation literature review in research preparation, Educational Researcher, 34(6), 3-15.

Creswell, J. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA:  SAGE Publications.

Greenwood, D. J., Whyte, W. F., & Harkavy, I. (1993) Participatory action research as a process and a goal. Human Relations, 46 (2), 175-192.

Merriam, S. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Hoboken, NJ: Jossey-Bass Publications.

Sagor, R. (2010). The action research guidebook: A four-stage process for educators and school teams. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. 

Salkind, N. (2013). Statistics for people who (think they) hate statistics. (3rd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Learning Objectives and Outcomes

Course Objectives

The course continues the work of EDU 812 as cohort members formalize their research proposals. Students will be supported throughout the proposal development process as they examine relevant literature, refine the problem, purpose, and questions for their studies, and consider the implications for study participants and other stakeholders.

Student Learning Outcomes

  1. Follow dissertation guidelines to produce a complete Chapter One, Introduction
  2. Describe the potential of your methodology to address equity and access of stakeholders to resources and opportunities.
  3. Complete IRB CITI course and demonstrate application of ethical decision-making within the research process by drafting the IRB application.
  4. Develop sufficient detail for methods section to successfully complete the UNE IRB application.
  5. Evaluate an emergent 3 chapter dissertation proposal contents against applied research standards and program guidelines.
  6. Prepare a research proposal that meets applied research criteria.

Assignments

EDU 813 marks a turning point in your development as a researcher. You are moving from a deeper dive into the literature to learn about what others have done before you to conducting your own scholarly study.

We move from one-week modules to two-week modules and focus entirely on the process of completing a dissertation proposal (the first three chapters of your dissertation).

The main deliverables are due at the end of week four (Chapter One) and end of Week 7 (first three chapters). You will be asked to provide feedback to two research team peers during week three and during week six.

Grading Policy

Your grade in this course will be determined by the following criteria:

Grade Breakdown

AssignmentPercent of Grade
Chapter 130
Full Draft Proposal (Chapters 1-3)50
Peer Reviews10 (5 each)
Proposal Presentation Slides10
TimelinePass/Fail

The criteria for all courses in the Ed. D. program are described in the modules and/or rubrics. Assignments will include guidelines with rubrics, descriptions of expectations or examples, and point values. Coursework will be assessed and graded using individual evaluation protocols that are provided for the three major assignments. Final grades will reflect the following schema:

  • High Pass (HP): Work that exceeds all or most of the criteria of the respective assignment. To receive a high pass the work must demonstrate exceptional command and display of all or most required elements;
  • Pass (P): Work that meets all requirements and expectations as specified in assignments, and is fully satisfactory in every respect;
  • Low Pass (LP): Work is deemed unsatisfactory.

Grade Scale: 95 = HP; 80-94 = P; 70-79 = LP.

Note: The instructor will determine if an assignment may be revised and resubmitted for rescoring. Candidates may proceed to subsequent courses in the curriculum with one LP grade, and although there is no failing grade, a second LP course grade results in termination from the doctoral program.

All assignments are to be completed in a timely manner with appropriate accuracy, detail, thought, and reflection fitting of doctoral-level degree candidates. All assignments whether completed in writing or with other media applications, are graded on the basis of faculty assessment of your ability to accurately apply concepts from readings, organization, and mechanics. See the appendices for grading rubrics. Please note that you must save all submitted documents in Microsoft Word in order for them to transmit successfully. All work must be properly identified and include author(s)’ name(s). Submit all written work in APA style (Refer to the APA Publication Manual for guidance; Purdue OWL is an excellent, user-friendly resource).

Schedule

Schedule – Modules are 2 weeks long

Weeks

Focus

Product

Where to post

Due Dates

1 & 2

1/3-1/14

Intro Chapter

Draft Chapter One

Affiliated Committee member nomination

Group Discussion Board

Nomination Form to Program Office

 

Post your draft of Chapter 1 by 11:59 PM ET on SUNDAY, 1/14 (end of Week 2).

3 & 4

1/15-1/28

Intro Chapter

Chapter One

RT meeting

Assignment

Provide substantive feedback to two RT group members by SUNDAY, 11:59 PM ET, 1/21 (end of Week 3).

Post your draft of Chapter 1 by 11:59 PM ET on SUNDAY, 1/28 (end of Week 4).

5 & 6

1/29-2/11

Methods Chapter

Draft Chapter Three

Group Discussion Board

Post your draft of Chapter 3 by 11:59 PM ET on SUNDAY, 2/4 (end of week 5).

Provide substantive feedback to two RT group members by SUNDAY, 11:59 PM ET, 2/11 (end of week 6).

CITI

Complete CITI course – certificate

Conducting research in your own organization

Certificate Assignment

Due by 11:59 PM ET on SUNDAY, 2/11 (end of week 6).

7 & 8

2/12-2/25

Chapters 1, 2, & 3

3 chapter proposal

Assignment

Due by 11:59 PM ET on Wednesday, 2/18 (week 7)

Draft PowerPoint

IRB app

Proposal presentation slides

Review UNE IRB application

Timeline Form

Group Discussion Board

 

Assignment

Due by 11:59 PM ET on Friday, 2/23 (week 8)

Student Resources

Online Student Support

Your Student Support Specialist is a resource for you. Please don't hesitate to contact them for assistance, including, but not limited to course planning, current problems or issues in a course, technology concerns, or personal emergencies.

Questions? Visit the Student Support Education page

UNE Libraries:

UNE Student Academic Success Center

The Student Academic Success Center (SASC) offers a range of services to support your academic achievement, including tutoring, writing support, test prep and studying strategies, learning style consultations, and many online resources. To make an appointment for tutoring, writing support, or a learning specialist consultation, go to une.tutortrac.com. To access our online resources, including links, guides, and video tutorials, please visit:

Accommodations

Any student who would like to request, or ask any questions regarding, academic adjustments or accommodations must contact the Student Access Center at (207) 221-4438 or pcstudentaccess@une.edu. Student Access Center staff will evaluate the student's documentation and determine eligibility of accommodation(s) through the Student Access Center registration procedure.

Policies

Late Work Policy

The content and submission timeline has been planned to ensure graduate students who are professionals can schedule readings, postings, peer review, and applied work in a systematic way and submit materials as directed. The Assignment upload instructions indicate the day work is due and will close at midnight on that day. If you are unable to meet a deadline you must notify the instructor before the due date, the instructor will determine if the work may be submitted past the due date and time and if a late penalty applies.

The timeliness of feedback from instructor and peers will depend on your timeliness in posting your materials. Evaluation of work will be conducted on the work submitted by due date.

Turnitin Originality Check and Plagiarism Detection Tool

The College of Professional Studies uses Turnitin to help deter plagiarism and to foster the proper attribution of sources. Turnitin provides comparative reports for submitted assignments that reflect similarities in other written works. This can include, but is not limited to, previously submitted assignments, internet articles, research journals, and academic databases.

Make sure to cite your sources appropriately as well as use your own words in synthesizing information from published literature. Webinars and workshops, included early in your coursework, will help guide best practices in APA citation and academic writing.

You can learn more about Turnitin in the Turnitin Student quick start guide.

Technology Requirements

Please review the technical requirements for UNE Online Graduate Programs

Course Evaluation Policy

Course surveys are one of the most important tools the University of New England uses for evaluating the quality of your education, and for providing meaningful feedback to instructors on their teaching. In order to assure that the feedback is both comprehensive and precise, we need to receive it from each student for each course. Evaluation access is distributed via UNE email at the beginning of the last week of the course.

Information Technology Services (ITS)

ITS Contact: Toll Free Help Desk 24 hours/7 days per week at 1-877-518-4673

Attendance Policy

Online students are required to submit a graded assignment/discussion prior to Sunday evening at 11:59 pm ET of the first week of the term. If a student does not submit a posting to the graded assignment/discussion prior to Sunday evening at 11:59 pm ET, the student will be automatically dropped from the course for non-participation. Review the full attendance policy.

Late Policy

Assignments: Late assignments will be accepted up to 3 days late; however, there is a 10% grade reduction (from the total points) for the late submission. After three days the assignment will not be accepted.

Discussion posts: If the initial post is submitted late, but still within the discussion board week, there will be a 10% grade reduction from the total discussion grade (e.g., a 3 point discussion will be reduced by 0.3 points). Any posts submitted after the end of the Discussion Board week will not be graded.

Please make every effort ahead of time to contact your instructor and your student support specialist if you are not able to meet an assignment deadline. Arrangements for extenuating circumstances may be considered by faculty.

Student Handbook Online - Policies and Procedures

The policies contained within this document apply to all students in the College of Graduate and Professional Studies. It is each student's responsibility to know the contents of this handbook.

UNE Online Student Handbook

UNE Course Withdrawal

Please contact your student support specialist if you are considering dropping or withdrawing from a course. The last day to drop for 100% tuition refund is the 2nd day of the course. Financial Aid charges may still apply. Students using Financial Aid should contact the Financial Aid Office prior to withdrawing from a course.

Academic Integrity

The University of New England values academic integrity in all aspects of the educational experience. Academic dishonesty in any form undermines this standard and devalues the original contributions of others. It is the responsibility of all members of the University community to actively uphold the integrity of the academy; failure to act, for any reason, is not acceptable. For information about plagiarism and academic misconduct, please visit UNE Plagiarism Policies.

Academic dishonesty includes, but is not limited to the following:

  1. Cheating, copying, or the offering or receiving of unauthorized assistance or information.
  2. Fabrication or falsification of data, results, or sources for papers or reports.
  3. Action which destroys or alters the work of another student.
  4. Multiple submissions of the same paper or report for assignments in more than one course without permission of each instructor.
  5. Plagiarism, the appropriation of records, research, materials, ideas, or the language of other persons or writers and the submission of them as one's own.

Charges of academic dishonesty will be reviewed by the Program Director. Penalties for students found responsible for violations may depend upon the seriousness and circumstances of the violation, the degree of premeditation involved, and/or the student’s previous record of violations.  Appeal of a decision may be made to the Dean whose decision will be final.  Student appeals will take place through the grievance process outlined in the student handbook.