Syllabus

Doctor of Education in Educational Leadership (Ed.D.)

EDU 811- Diagnosing Organizational Dynamics – Fall 2015 A

Credits - 3

Description

Transformative leaders are successful in diagnosing and interacting with both internal and external forces affecting the organizational environment. This includes socio-cultural factors, poverty, family situations, and heath. Candidates analyze case studies of effective and ineffective individual, group, and organizational dynamics that drive and restrain change processes. Appropriate interventional strategies are considered.

Materials

Required Materials:

Argyris, C. (2012). Organizational traps: Leadership, culture, organizational design. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

Bolman, L., & Deal, T. (2013). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice and leadership (4th Ed). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. (Other editions are acceptable)

Brown, M. (2007). Building powerful community organizations. Pressworks.

Center on Innovation and Improvement. (2008). Leadership resource toolkit. Retrieved March 28, 2014 from http://www.centerii.org/techassist/solutionfinding/resources/LeadershipToolkit.pdf

Dyer, J., Gregerson, H., & Christenson, C. (2011). The Innovator’s DNA: Mastering the five skills of disruptive innovators. New York.

Gallos, J. V. (Ed.). (2006). Organizational development: A Jossey-Bass reader. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Heider, J. (2005). The Tao of leadership. Atlanta, GA: Humanics New Age.

Kotter, J. (2012). Leading change. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Wheatley, M (2006). Leadership and the new science: Discovering order in a chaotic world (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Berrett Koehler Publishers.

 

Required Electronic Materials:

Grace, D., Korach, R., Riordan, K., & Storm, K. (2006). Assessment and intervention using the perspective of the four organizational frames. Business and Economics Research, 4(10), 15-30.

Heifetz, R., Kania, J. V., & Kramer, M. R. (Winter, 2004). Leading Boldly: Foundations can move past traditional approaches to create social change through imaginative – and even controversial – leadership. Stanford Social Innovation Review.

Monahan, M. L., & Shah, A. J. (2011). Having the right tools: The leadership frames of university presidents. The Coastal Business Journal, 10(1), 14-30.

Rice, D. & Harris, M. M. (2003). Leadership in community schools: A frame analysis. Reclaiming Children and Youth, 11(4), 216-220.

Shields, C. (2010). Transformative leadership: Working for equity in diverse contexts. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(4), 558-589.

 

Supplemental Materials:

Barrett, A. J. (2012) Transformative leadership and the purpose of schooling in affluent communities. Doctoral dissertation from University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, IL. Retrieved April 8, 2014 from https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/bitstream/handle/2142/30967/Barrett_Andrew.pdf?sequence=1

Bushe, G. R. & Kassam, A. F. (2005). When is appreciative inquiry transformational? A meta-case analysis. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 41(2), 161-181. DOI: 10.1177/0021886304270337.

Bushe, G. R., (2013) Generative process, generative outcome: The transformation potential of appreciate inquiry, in D. L. Cooperrider, D. P., Zandee, L. N., Godwin, M.

Avital & B. Boland (Eds). Organizational generativity: The appreciative inquiry summit and a scholarship of transformation (Advances in Appreciative Inquiry, Volume 4, pp 89-113), Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Donaldson, Gordon A. (2008). How leaders learn: Cultivating capacities for school improvement. New York: Teachers College Press.

Kahl, J. (2004). Leading from the heart: Choosing to be a servant leader. Westlake, OH: Jack Kahl and Associates.

Kegan, R. & Lahey, L. L. (2009). Immunity to change: How to overcome it and unlock the potential in yourself and your organization. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing Company.

Lee, W. O. (2012). Moral leadership where east meets west. Multicultural Education Review, 4(1), 29-50.

Pellicer, L. O. (2003). Caring enough to lead: How reflective thought leads to moral leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Secretan. L. (2006). One: The art and practice of conscious leadership. Caledon, Ontario, CAL Secretan Center Inc.

Sergiovannie, T. J. (2007). An epistemological problem: What if we have the wrong theory? In Houston, P. D., Blankstein, A. M., & Cole, R. W. (Eds.), Out-of-the-box leadership (49-68). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Silsbee, D. (2010). The mindful coach: Seven roles for facilitating leader development. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Learning Objectives and Outcomes

Course Objectives

This course is designed to support change agents in evaluating and supporting continuous, transformative organizational development. Students will utilize organization development and transformative leadership literature to illustrate critical attributes associated with their leadership development and their experiences facilitating transformative change.

Student Learning Outcomes (SLO)

  1. Identify and implement multiple forms of communication to explain the current status of the case study scenario to diverse stakeholders
  2. Identify and describe specific change leadership strategies and organizational processes to facilitate commitment to continuous, transformational change
  3. Describe and provide rationale for strategies to engage change initiative stakeholders
  4. Create, in collaboration with stakeholders, a strategic continuous improvement plan that addresses the current change initiative challenges, successes, and/or refocus
  5. Use multiple frames of analyses, along with practice, research and data, to illustrate ongoing transformative leadership development
  6. Critically assess and provide peer review feedback and coaching to improve and refine leadership development and research skills

Assignments

Study Group Discussion Boards

Each member of your group will start by reading at least one chapter from the OD Reader. Each member will write an annotation of the chapter read, and post the annotation to the group Discussion Board by Friday. You should then read each annotation posted. Next, you will select and read at least one of the chapters annotated by another student.  Once you have read the additional chapter you will need to write a reflection back to the original reader.

Whole Class Discussion Boards

Each member of the class will respond to a prompt which will be a reflection on a video or reading. Next, you will read and respond to at least two classmates’ posts.

Historical Leaders in the Field PowerPoint

You will research and present on 5 historical leaders from your field of study and present the information in a 12 – 15 slide PowerPoint presentation (not including title or reference pages). 

Transformative Learning Reflection, Credo and Professional Development Plan

This assignment is designed to support a critical analysis of your development as a transformative leader reflecting on at least three of the Shield’s tenets. To complete this assignment, use multiple data sources for analysis to document your development as a transformative leader. Identify your essential commitments to transformative leadership and craft a leadership credo. To culminate this assignment, create a “next steps” plan to inform your ongoing leadership development.

This assignment has three major components. The first part, the Artifact, will be submitted in your Study Group Discussion Board in Week 4. Parts 2 and 3 are submitted as a single assignment in Week 5.

  1. Data collection, analysis and documentation (Evidenced in survey) and Representation of TL development
  2. Leadership credo
  3. TL Professional development plan

Case Study Assignment: Organizational Change

This final assignment will allow you to take what you have learned in your leadership studies and apply it to a real-world scenario.

Grading Policy

Your grade in this course will be determined by the following criteria:

Grade Breakdown

AssignmentPoints
Study Group Discussion Board (7 threads)28 points (4 each)
Whole Class Discussion Board (4 threads)16 points (4 each)
Historical Leaders in the Field PowerPoint20 points
Transformative Leadership Artifact 6 points
Transformative Learning Reflection, Credo and Professional Development Plan 10 points
Case Study Assignment20 points

Grading

The criteria for all courses in the Ed. D. program are described in the modules and/or rubrics. Assignments will include guidelines with rubrics, descriptions of expectations, or examples, and include point values. Coursework will be assessed and graded using individual evaluation protocols that are provided for the three major assignments. Final “grades” will reflect the following schema:

  • High Pass (HP): Work that exceeds all or most of the criteria of the respective assignment. To receive a high pass the work must demonstrate exceptional command and display of all or most required elements;
  • Pass (P): Work that meets all requirements and expectations as specified in assignments, and is fully satisfactory in every respect;
  • Low Pass (LP): Work is deemed unsatisfactory.

Note** The instructor will determine if an assignment may be revised and resubmitted for rescoring. Candidates may proceed to subsequent courses in the curriculum with one LP grade, and although there is no failing grade, a second LP course grade results in termination from the doctoral program.

All assignments are to be completed in a timely manner with appropriate accuracy, detail, thought and reflection fitting of doctoral-level degree candidates. All assignments (done in writing or with other media applications) are graded on the basis of faculty assessment of your ability to accurately apply concepts from readings, organization, and mechanics. See the appendices for grading rubrics. Please note that you must save all submitted documents in Microsoft Word in order for them to transmit successfully. All work must be properly identified and include author(s)’ name(s). Submit all written work in APA style (Refer to the APA Publication Manual for guidance; Purdue OWL is an excellent, user-friendly resource). 

Schedule

This is only a tentative schedule and is meant to give you a bird’s eye view. The activities and assignments may change at the discretion of the instructor.

Week

Topic

Activities & Assignments

Dates

1

Collecting Data – Measures of Successes and Challenges

Organizational Development Reading (ODR) Chapters 7 – 11

Cuban article

Center for Innovation & Improvement reading

Shield’s article

Tao of Leadership Chapter 1

Wheatley video

Kotter videos

Workshop Proceedings video

Study Group Discussion Board

Whole Class Discussion Board

Transformative Leadership Reflection Activities (survey and artifact collection)

Due: Sunday, September 6 at 11:55 pm. EST

2

Making Sense of the Data – What Has Changed?

ODR Chapters 12 – 16

Argyris Part 1

One of 3 articles (Grace, Monahan, or Rice)

Tao of Leadership Chapter 8, plus one

Heifitz video

Wolves Change Rivers video

Study Group Discussion Board

Whole Class Discussion Board

Transformative Leadership Reflection Activities (survey and artifact collection)

Due: Sunday, September 13 at 11:55 pm. EST

3

Communicating the Status of the Change Initiative

ODR Chapters 22 – 26

Greene article

Tao of Leadership Chapter 22, plus one

Freire video

Study Group Discussion Board

Whole Class Discussion Board

Transformative Leadership Reflection Activities (survey and artifact collection)

Due: Sunday, September 20 at 11:55 pm. EST

4

Focusing on Leadership Development of the Guiding Coalition and Personal Development

ODR Chapters 27 – 34

Heifetz article

Tao of Leadership Chapter 29, plus one

Heifetz video

Morukian video

Study Group Discussion Board Post

Study Group Discussion Board: Transformative Leadership Reflection Artifact (Part 1)

Historical Leaders in the Field PowerPoint Assignment

Due: Sunday, September 27 at 11:55 pm. EST

5

Analyzing and Describing Your Evolving Development as a Transformative Leader

ODR Chapters 35 – 40

Tao of Leadership Chapter 36

Brown video

Study Group Discussion Board Post

Study Group Discussion Board: COMMENT on Artifacts

Transformative Learning Reflection, Credo and Professional Development Plan Assignment

Due: Sunday, October 4 at 11:55 pm. EST

6

Stakeholders and the Role of Data in Establishing the Next Steps of a Continuous Improvement Cycle

ODR Chapters 41 – 47

Tao of Leadership Chapter 23, plus one

Goleman video

Study Group Discussion Board Post

Whole Class Discussion Board

Due: Sunday,

October 11 at 11:55 pm. EST

7

Communicating the Successes, Challenges, and Next Steps of the Change Initiative

Avolio article

Argyris Part II

Riggio video

Study Group Discussion Board Post

Whole Class Discussion Board & Personal Research Journal

Case Study Assignment

Due: Sunday, October 18 at 11:55 pm. EST

8

Reflecting on the Process of Leading a Change Initiative: What You Learned and Where You Are Going from Here

Course Evaluation – The link will be emailed to you.

Due: By Friday, October 23 at 11:55 pm. EST

 

Student Resources

Online Student Support

Your Student Support Specialist is a resource for you. Please don't hesitate to contact them for assistance, including, but not limited to course planning, current problems or issues in a course, technology concerns, or personal emergencies.

Questions? Visit the Student Support Education page

UNE Libraries:

UNE Student Academic Success Center

The Student Academic Success Center (SASC) offers a range of services to support your academic achievement, including tutoring, writing support, test prep and studying strategies, learning style consultations, and many online resources. To make an appointment for tutoring, writing support, or a learning specialist consultation, go to une.tutortrac.com. To access our online resources, including links, guides, and video tutorials, please visit:

Accommodations

Any student who would like to request, or ask any questions regarding, academic adjustments or accommodations must contact the Student Access Center at (207) 221-4438 or pcstudentaccess@une.edu. Student Access Center staff will evaluate the student's documentation and determine eligibility of accommodation(s) through the Student Access Center registration procedure.

Policies

Late Work Policy

The content and submission timeline has been planned to ensure graduate students who are professionals can schedule readings, postings, peer review, and applied work in a systematic way and submit materials as directed. The Assignment upload instructions indicate the day work is due and will close at midnight on that day. If you are unable to meet a deadline you must notify the instructor before the due date, the instructor will determine if the work may be submitted past the due date and time and if a late penalty applies.

The timeliness of feedback from instructor and peers will depend on your timeliness in posting your materials. Evaluation of work will be conducted on the work submitted by due date.

Turnitin Originality Check and Plagiarism Detection Tool

The College of Professional Studies uses Turnitin to help deter plagiarism and to foster the proper attribution of sources. Turnitin provides comparative reports for submitted assignments that reflect similarities in other written works. This can include, but is not limited to, previously submitted assignments, internet articles, research journals, and academic databases.

Make sure to cite your sources appropriately as well as use your own words in synthesizing information from published literature. Webinars and workshops, included early in your coursework, will help guide best practices in APA citation and academic writing.

You can learn more about Turnitin in the Turnitin Student quick start guide.

Technology Requirements

Please review the technical requirements for UNE Online Graduate Programs

Course Evaluation Policy

Course surveys are one of the most important tools the University of New England uses for evaluating the quality of your education, and for providing meaningful feedback to instructors on their teaching. In order to assure that the feedback is both comprehensive and precise, we need to receive it from each student for each course. Evaluation access is distributed via UNE email at the beginning of the last week of the course.

Information Technology Services (ITS)

ITS Contact: Toll Free Help Desk 24 hours/7 days per week at 1-877-518-4673

Attendance Policy

Online students are required to submit a graded assignment/discussion prior to Sunday evening at 11:59 pm ET of the first week of the term. If a student does not submit a posting to the graded assignment/discussion prior to Sunday evening at 11:59 pm ET, the student will be automatically dropped from the course for non-participation. Review the full attendance policy.

Late Policy

Assignments: Late assignments will be accepted up to 3 days late; however, there is a 10% grade reduction (from the total points) for the late submission. After three days the assignment will not be accepted.

Discussion posts: If the initial post is submitted late, but still within the discussion board week, there will be a 10% grade reduction from the total discussion grade (e.g., a 3 point discussion will be reduced by 0.3 points). Any posts submitted after the end of the Discussion Board week will not be graded.

Please make every effort ahead of time to contact your instructor and your student support specialist if you are not able to meet an assignment deadline. Arrangements for extenuating circumstances may be considered by faculty.

Student Handbook Online - Policies and Procedures

The policies contained within this document apply to all students in the College of Graduate and Professional Studies. It is each student's responsibility to know the contents of this handbook.

UNE Online Student Handbook

UNE Course Withdrawal

Please contact your student support specialist if you are considering dropping or withdrawing from a course. The last day to drop for 100% tuition refund is the 2nd day of the course. Financial Aid charges may still apply. Students using Financial Aid should contact the Financial Aid Office prior to withdrawing from a course.

Academic Integrity

The University of New England values academic integrity in all aspects of the educational experience. Academic dishonesty in any form undermines this standard and devalues the original contributions of others. It is the responsibility of all members of the University community to actively uphold the integrity of the academy; failure to act, for any reason, is not acceptable. For information about plagiarism and academic misconduct, please visit UNE Plagiarism Policies.

Academic dishonesty includes, but is not limited to the following:

  1. Cheating, copying, or the offering or receiving of unauthorized assistance or information.
  2. Fabrication or falsification of data, results, or sources for papers or reports.
  3. Action which destroys or alters the work of another student.
  4. Multiple submissions of the same paper or report for assignments in more than one course without permission of each instructor.
  5. Plagiarism, the appropriation of records, research, materials, ideas, or the language of other persons or writers and the submission of them as one's own.

Charges of academic dishonesty will be reviewed by the Program Director. Penalties for students found responsible for violations may depend upon the seriousness and circumstances of the violation, the degree of premeditation involved, and/or the student’s previous record of violations.  Appeal of a decision may be made to the Dean whose decision will be final.  Student appeals will take place through the grievance process outlined in the student handbook.