Syllabus
Doctor of Education in Educational Leadership (Ed.D.)
EDU 810 – Ethical Leadership – Spring B 2016
Credits - 3
Description
Candidates are exposed to the complex set of issues relating to ethical behavior in institutional settings, including academic integrity, curriculum choices, student assessment, parental involvement community relations, and administrative-staff conflict. Through readings, case analyses, and other means of investigation, the consequences of ethical and unethical practices and their impact on individuals and organizations is examined.
Materials
Learning Objectives and Outcomes
Students will be introduced to a number of theories of moral behavior and, using case studies of ethical dilemmas in leadership, will learn to evaluate the relevance and efficacy of various moral philosophies to ethical decision making. On completion of the course, the successful student will be able to:
- Define moral philosophy (ethics) and differentiate it from feelings, religion, law, and cultural relativism.
- Differentiate among the following philosophies: Categorical Imperative, Utilitarianism, Virtue, Social Contract, and the Multiple Ethical Paradigms of Justice, Critique, Care, and Profession.
- Evaluate the effectiveness of applied ethical theories by analyzing the problem and possible actions in a variety of ethical dilemmas.
- Practice the process of deliberating and making decisions about ethical dilemmas.
- Develop a personal theoretical framework to guide your leadership practice based on moral philosophies (ethics) introduced in this course.
Assignments
There are ten graded discussions and three graded assignments during in this course. The first written assignment occurs in Week 3 and is a comparative analysis of the student’s choice of two moral theories that were studied in the first three weeks’ readings. The second assignment, due Week 6, requires the student to draft an annotated outline that will be used to guide their final assignment in Week 8, which is a summary of their personal philosophy of ethics as it relates to leadership.
Grading Policy
Your grade in this course will be determined by the following criteria:
Grade Breakdown
| Week | Assignment | Points |
|---|---|---|
| 1-8 | 10 Graded Discussions @ 4 points each | 40 |
| 3 | Assignment #1 Analysis of two Moral Theories | 20 |
| 6n | Assignment #2 Annotated Outline of Personal Philosophy Statement | 10 |
| 8 | Assignment #2 Personal Philosophy of Ethics in Leadership | 30 |
| TOTAL | 100 |
The criteria for all courses in the Ed. D. program are described in the modules and/or rubrics. Assignments will include guidelines with rubrics, descriptions of expectations, or examples, and include point values. Coursework will be assessed and graded using individual evaluation protocols that are provided for the three major assignments. Final “grades” will reflect the following schema:
- High Pass (HP): Work that exceeds all or most of the criteria of the respective assignment. To receive a high pass the work must demonstrate exceptional command and display of all or most required elements;
- Pass (P): Work that meets all requirements and expectations as specified in assignments, and is fully satisfactory in every respect;
- Low Pass (LP): Work is deemed unsatisfactory.
Note** The instructor will determine if an assignment may be revised and resubmitted for rescoring. Candidates may proceed to subsequent courses in the curriculum with one LP grade, and although there is no failing grade, a second LP course grade results in termination from the doctoral program.
All assignments are to be completed in a timely manner with appropriate accuracy, detail, thought and reflection fitting of doctoral-level degree candidates. All assignments (done in writing or with other media applications) are graded on the basis of faculty assessment of your ability to accurately apply concepts from readings, organization, and mechanics. See the appendices for grading rubrics. Please note that you must save all submitted documents in Microsoft Word in order for them to transmit successfully. All work must be properly identified and include author(s)’ name(s). Submit all written work in APA style (Refer to the APA Publication Manual for guidance; Purdue OWL is an excellent, user-friendly resource).
Schedule
|
EDU 810 COURSE SCHEDULE |
|||
|
Week #: Dates |
Topic |
Assignments |
Assignment Due Date |
|
Week 1: Mar 2-6 |
Introduction to Moral Philosophy |
Post to Week 1: Introduction (ungraded) Read Cahn, Chapters 1-4 Post to Week 1 Cahn, Chapters 1-4 |
None |
|
Week 2: Mar 7-13 |
Challenges to Morality |
Read Cahn, Chapters 5-11 Post to Week 2 Cahn, Chapters 5-11 |
None |
|
Week 3: Mar 14-20 |
Moral Theories |
Read Shapiro & Gross Chapters 1-3 Read Cahn, Chapters 12-20 Post to Week 3 Compare and Contrast Submit Assignment #1: Comparative Analysis and Reflection Paper |
Assignment #1 Submit March 20 |
|
Week 4: Mar 21-27 |
Security vs. Civil Liberties |
Read Shapiro & Gross Chapter 4 Post to Week 4 Security vs. Civil Liberties Case Study |
|
|
Week 5: Mar 28–Apr 3 |
Power vs. Accommodation; Personal Vision vs. Authority |
Read Shapiro & Gross Chapter 5 Shapiro & Gross Chapter 9 Post to Week 5 Power vs. Accommodation Case Study Post to Week 5 Personal Vision vs. Authority Case Study |
|
|
Week 6: Apr 4 – 10 |
Accountability vs. Responsibility |
Read Shapiro & Gross Chapter 6 Post to Week 6 Accountability vs. Responsibility Case Study Submit Assignment #2: Annotated Outline of Personal Philosophy of Ethics in Leadership |
Assignment #2 Submit April 10 |
|
Week 7: Apr 10- 17 |
Community Standards vs. Individual Rights; Rules, Regulations & Policy vs. Individual Needs & Concerns |
Read Shapiro & Gross Chapter 7 Read Shapiro & Gross Chapter 10 Post to Week 7 Community Standards Vs. Individual Rights Case Study Post to Week 7 Rules, Regulations & Policy vs. Individual Needs & Concerns Case Study |
|
|
Week 8: Apr 18-24 |
Equality vs. Equity |
Read Shapiro & Gross Chapter 8 Post to Week 8 Equality vs. Equity Case Study Submit Assignment #3: Personal Philosophy of Ethics in Leadership Post to Week 8 Course Wrap Up 3-2-1 (ungraded) |
Assignment #3 Submit by FRIDAY, April 22 |
Student Resources
Online Student Support
Your Student Support Specialist is a resource for you. Please don't hesitate to contact them for assistance, including, but not limited to course planning, current problems or issues in a course, technology concerns, or personal emergencies.
Questions? Visit the Student Support Education page
UNE Libraries:
- Library Access for all students: Your library login ID and password are the same as the ones you use to log into Blackboard/Brightspace.
- EDD Databases: View EDD Databases
- Library Tutorial: Find an article
- Library Questions: Ask a librarian or phone library staff at (207) 602-2361 or (207) 221-4330.
UNE Student Academic Success Center
The Student Academic Success Center (SASC) offers a range of services to support your academic achievement, including tutoring, writing support, test prep and studying strategies, learning style consultations, and many online resources. To make an appointment for tutoring, writing support, or a learning specialist consultation, go to une.tutortrac.com. To access our online resources, including links, guides, and video tutorials, please visit:
Accommodations
Any student who would like to request, or ask any questions regarding, academic adjustments or accommodations must contact the Student Access Center at (207) 221-4438 or pcstudentaccess@une.edu. Student Access Center staff will evaluate the student's documentation and determine eligibility of accommodation(s) through the Student Access Center registration procedure.
Policies
Turnitin Originality Check and Plagiarism Detection Tool
The College of Professional Studies uses Turnitin to help deter plagiarism and to foster the proper attribution of sources. Turnitin provides comparative reports for submitted assignments that reflect similarities in other written works. This can include, but is not limited to, previously submitted assignments, internet articles, research journals, and academic databases.
Make sure to cite your sources appropriately as well as use your own words in synthesizing information from published literature. Webinars and workshops, included early in your coursework, will help guide best practices in APA citation and academic writing.
You can learn more about Turnitin in the Turnitin Student quick start guide.
Technology Requirements
Please review the technical requirements for UNE Online Graduate Programs
Course Evaluation Policy
Course surveys are one of the most important tools the University of New England uses for evaluating the quality of your education, and for providing meaningful feedback to instructors on their teaching. In order to assure that the feedback is both comprehensive and precise, we need to receive it from each student for each course. Evaluation access is distributed via UNE email at the beginning of the last week of the course.
Information Technology Services (ITS)
ITS Contact: Toll Free Help Desk 24 hours/7 days per week at 1-877-518-4673
Attendance Policy
Online students are required to submit a graded assignment/discussion prior to Sunday evening at 11:59 pm ET of the first week of the term. If a student does not submit a posting to the graded assignment/discussion prior to Sunday evening at 11:59 pm ET, the student will be automatically dropped from the course for non-participation. Review the full attendance policy.
Late Policy
Assignments: Late assignments will be accepted up to 3 days late; however, there is a 10% grade reduction (from the total points) for the late submission. After three days the assignment will not be accepted.
Discussion posts: If the initial post is submitted late, but still within the discussion board week, there will be a 10% grade reduction from the total discussion grade (e.g., a 3 point discussion will be reduced by 0.3 points). Any posts submitted after the end of the Discussion Board week will not be graded.
Please make every effort ahead of time to contact your instructor and your student support specialist if you are not able to meet an assignment deadline. Arrangements for extenuating circumstances may be considered by faculty.
Student Handbook Online - Policies and Procedures
The policies contained within this document apply to all students in the College of Graduate and Professional Studies. It is each student's responsibility to know the contents of this handbook.
UNE Course Withdrawal
Please contact your student support specialist if you are considering dropping or withdrawing from a course. The last day to drop for 100% tuition refund is the 2nd day of the course. Financial Aid charges may still apply. Students using Financial Aid should contact the Financial Aid Office prior to withdrawing from a course.
Academic Integrity
The University of New England values academic integrity in all aspects of the educational experience. Academic dishonesty in any form undermines this standard and devalues the original contributions of others. It is the responsibility of all members of the University community to actively uphold the integrity of the academy; failure to act, for any reason, is not acceptable. For information about plagiarism and academic misconduct, please visit UNE Plagiarism Policies.
Academic dishonesty includes, but is not limited to the following:
- Cheating, copying, or the offering or receiving of unauthorized assistance or information.
- Fabrication or falsification of data, results, or sources for papers or reports.
- Action which destroys or alters the work of another student.
- Multiple submissions of the same paper or report for assignments in more than one course without permission of each instructor.
- Plagiarism, the appropriation of records, research, materials, ideas, or the language of other persons or writers and the submission of them as one's own.
Charges of academic dishonesty will be reviewed by the Program Director. Penalties for students found responsible for violations may depend upon the seriousness and circumstances of the violation, the degree of premeditation involved, and/or the student’s previous record of violations. Appeal of a decision may be made to the Dean whose decision will be final. Student appeals will take place through the grievance process outlined in the student handbook.