Syllabus

Doctor of Education in Educational Leadership (Ed.D.)

EDU 801: Preparation for Educational Leadership – Fall A 2015

Credits - 3

Description

This course supports development of self, organization and community through an exploration of Educational Leadership theory, as well as other more contemporary theories of leadership. Instructors provide current and aspiring leaders in diverse settings (e.g., education, health, non-profits, NGOs, public and private organizations and agencies, etc.) with perspectives, knowledge, experiences, and skills that students can use to help transform and lead their organizations effectively. The course introduces ways of thinking about leadership that will ground students’ subsequent work in the program.

Materials

Required

Burns, J.M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper Perennial.

Marion, R. & Gonzales, L.D. (2013). Leadership in Education: Organizational Theory for the Practitioner. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.

(NOTE: Both print and electronic versions are acceptable.)

Recommended

Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). (2009).

Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Learning Objectives and Outcomes

  1. Specify and describe traditional leadership theories, the assumptions upon which they rest, and their implications for leadership practice.
  2. Analyze your own leadership style in contrast to traditional leadership theories.
  3. Synthesize the impact of diverse voices in leadership roles on leadership theories.
  4. Apply research theories as you conduct a study of a leader wherein you analyze his or her understanding of and conduct of his or her leadership.
  5. Improve skills of critical thinking and analysis.
  6. Communicate understanding effectively in writing using APA style in preparation for future writing expectations of the program.

Assignments

Regular whole class and small study group discussion board posts

Students will be required to respond to prompts related to course materials and engage with colleagues in the course to support understanding and the co-construction of knowledge.

Interview Protocol

Students will develop an interview protocol to use as a guide when conducting an interview with a leader in their field.

Leadership Interview Reflection and Analysis Project

Students will transcribe an interview with a leader in their field and formally reflect on their learning, using data from the interview and making connections to course materials.

Grading Policy

Your grade in this course will be determined by the following criteria:

Grade Breakdown

AssignmentPoints
Introduction Discussion Board5
Whole Class Discussion Boards (5 points each)25
Small Group Discussion Boards (5 points each)25
Interview Protocol10
Leadership Interview Reflection and Analysis Project25
Final Small Group Discussion Board10
Total:100

Grading

The criteria for all courses in the Ed. D. program are described in the modules and/or rubrics. Assignments will include guidelines with rubrics, descriptions of expectations, or examples, and include point values. Coursework will be assessed and graded using individual evaluation protocols that are provided for the three major assignments. Final “grades” will reflect the following schema:

  • High Pass (HP): Work that exceeds all or most of the criteria of the respective assignment. To receive a high pass the work must demonstrate exceptional command and display of all or most required elements;
  • Pass (P): Work that meets all requirements and expectations as specified in assignments, and is fully satisfactory in every respect;
  • Low Pass (LP): Work is deemed unsatisfactory.

Note** The instructor will determine if an assignment may be revised and resubmitted for rescoring. Candidates may proceed to subsequent courses in the curriculum with one LP grade, and although there is no failing grade, a second LP course grade results in termination from the doctoral program.

All assignments are to be completed in a timely manner with appropriate accuracy, detail, thought and reflection fitting of doctoral-level degree candidates. All assignments (done in writing or with other media applications) are graded on the basis of faculty assessment of your ability to accurately apply concepts from readings, organization, and mechanics. Please note that you must save all submitted documents in Microsoft Word/Excel/PowerPoint in order for them to transmit successfully. All work must be properly identified and include author(s)’ name(s). Submit all written work in APA style (Refer to the APA Publication Manual for guidance; Purdue OWL is an excellent, user-friendly resource). 

Schedule

This is only a tentative schedule and is meant to give you a bird’s eye view. The activities and assignments may change at the discretion of the instructor.

Week

Topic

Activities & Assignments

Dates

1

Introduction

Burns: Chapters 1 & 2

Marion & Gonzales: Intro & Chapter 2

Class Discussion Board (DB)

Initial DB Post
Due: Friday, Jan. 8

DB Comments
Due: Sunday, Jan. 10

2

Leadership for Change

Burns: Chapters 10 & 13

Marion & Gonzales: Chapter 7

Class & Small Group Discussion Boards

Initial DB Posts
Due: Wednesday, Jan. 13

DB Comments
Due: Sunday, Jan. 17

3

Leading within Institutions

Burns: Chapter 11

Marion & Gonzales: Chapter 13

Class & Small Group Discussion Boards

Initial DB Posts
Due: Wednesday, Jan. 20

DB Comments
Due: Sunday, Jan. 24

4

Leadership and Culture

Burns: Chapters 6 & 9

Marion & Gonzales: Chapter 11

Class & Small Group Discussion Boards

Arrange Interview

Initial DB Posts
Due: Wednesday, Jan. 27

DB Comments
Due: Sunday, Jan. 31

5

Leadership, Change and Conflict

Burns: Chapter 15

Marion & Gonzales: Chapters 8 & 9

Class & Small Group Discussion Boards

Review interview preparation materials

DRAFT Interview Protocol

Initial DB Posts
Due: Wednesday, Feb. 3

DB Comments and DRAFT Interview Protocol
Due: Sunday, Feb. 7

6

Theorizing the Goals of Leadership

Burns: Chapters 16 & 17

Marion & Gonzales: Chapter 10

Class & Small Group Discussion Boards

Final Interview Protocol

Conduct, record, transcribe interview – this week or next.

Initial DB Posts
Due: Wednesday, Feb. 10

DB Comments and Interview Protocol
Due: Sunday, Feb. 14

7

Talking with Leaders

Conduct, record, transcribe interview.

Leadership Interview Reflection & Analysis Project

Leadership Interview Reflection & Analysis Project
Due: Sunday, Feb. 21

8

Leadership in Context

Kantor, J.

Marion & Gonzales: Chapter 12

Small Group Discussion Board

Post sanitized version of interview transcript to Group Discussion Board

Initial DB Posts
Due: Wednesday, Feb. 24

DB Comments and interview transcript
Due: By Friday, Feb. 26 at 11:59 pm. EST

Student Resources

Online Student Support

Your Student Support Specialist is a resource for you. Please don't hesitate to contact them for assistance, including, but not limited to course planning, current problems or issues in a course, technology concerns, or personal emergencies.

Questions? Visit the Student Support Education page

UNE Libraries:

UNE Student Academic Success Center

The Student Academic Success Center (SASC) offers a range of services to support your academic achievement, including tutoring, writing support, test prep and studying strategies, learning style consultations, and many online resources. To make an appointment for tutoring, writing support, or a learning specialist consultation, go to une.tutortrac.com. To access our online resources, including links, guides, and video tutorials, please visit:

Accommodations

Any student who would like to request, or ask any questions regarding, academic adjustments or accommodations must contact the Student Access Center at (207) 221-4438 or pcstudentaccess@une.edu. Student Access Center staff will evaluate the student's documentation and determine eligibility of accommodation(s) through the Student Access Center registration procedure.

Policies

Turnitin Originality Check and Plagiarism Detection Tool

The College of Professional Studies uses Turnitin to help deter plagiarism and to foster the proper attribution of sources. Turnitin provides comparative reports for submitted assignments that reflect similarities in other written works. This can include, but is not limited to, previously submitted assignments, internet articles, research journals, and academic databases.

Make sure to cite your sources appropriately as well as use your own words in synthesizing information from published literature. Webinars and workshops, included early in your coursework, will help guide best practices in APA citation and academic writing.

You can learn more about Turnitin in the Turnitin Student quick start guide.

Technology Requirements

Please review the technical requirements for UNE Online Graduate Programs

Course Evaluation Policy

Course surveys are one of the most important tools the University of New England uses for evaluating the quality of your education, and for providing meaningful feedback to instructors on their teaching. In order to assure that the feedback is both comprehensive and precise, we need to receive it from each student for each course. Evaluation access is distributed via UNE email at the beginning of the last week of the course.

Information Technology Services (ITS)

ITS Contact: Toll Free Help Desk 24 hours/7 days per week at 1-877-518-4673

Attendance Policy

Online students are required to submit a graded assignment/discussion prior to Sunday evening at 11:59 pm ET of the first week of the term. If a student does not submit a posting to the graded assignment/discussion prior to Sunday evening at 11:59 pm ET, the student will be automatically dropped from the course for non-participation. Review the full attendance policy.

Late Policy

Assignments: Late assignments will be accepted up to 3 days late; however, there is a 10% grade reduction (from the total points) for the late submission. After three days the assignment will not be accepted.

Discussion posts: If the initial post is submitted late, but still within the discussion board week, there will be a 10% grade reduction from the total discussion grade (e.g., a 3 point discussion will be reduced by 0.3 points). Any posts submitted after the end of the Discussion Board week will not be graded.

Please make every effort ahead of time to contact your instructor and your student support specialist if you are not able to meet an assignment deadline. Arrangements for extenuating circumstances may be considered by faculty.

Student Handbook Online - Policies and Procedures

The policies contained within this document apply to all students in the College of Graduate and Professional Studies. It is each student's responsibility to know the contents of this handbook.

UNE Online Student Handbook

UNE Course Withdrawal

Please contact your student support specialist if you are considering dropping or withdrawing from a course. The last day to drop for 100% tuition refund is the 2nd day of the course. Financial Aid charges may still apply. Students using Financial Aid should contact the Financial Aid Office prior to withdrawing from a course.

Academic Integrity

The University of New England values academic integrity in all aspects of the educational experience. Academic dishonesty in any form undermines this standard and devalues the original contributions of others. It is the responsibility of all members of the University community to actively uphold the integrity of the academy; failure to act, for any reason, is not acceptable. For information about plagiarism and academic misconduct, please visit UNE Plagiarism Policies.

Academic dishonesty includes, but is not limited to the following:

  1. Cheating, copying, or the offering or receiving of unauthorized assistance or information.
  2. Fabrication or falsification of data, results, or sources for papers or reports.
  3. Action which destroys or alters the work of another student.
  4. Multiple submissions of the same paper or report for assignments in more than one course without permission of each instructor.
  5. Plagiarism, the appropriation of records, research, materials, ideas, or the language of other persons or writers and the submission of them as one's own.

Charges of academic dishonesty will be reviewed by the Program Director. Penalties for students found responsible for violations may depend upon the seriousness and circumstances of the violation, the degree of premeditation involved, and/or the student’s previous record of violations.  Appeal of a decision may be made to the Dean whose decision will be final.  Student appeals will take place through the grievance process outlined in the student handbook.