Syllabus

Master of Science in Applied Nutrition

APN 610 Research Methods – Spring 2019

Credits - 3

Description

Research methods and research design commonly used in nutrition research are examined. Topics include defining research questions, developing hypotheses, writing research goals and objectives, reviewing and interpreting literature, choosing appropriate research designs, and understanding and summarizing relevant data. Professional presentation of research findings is emphasized.  

 

 

Materials

  • Two dice
  • Jacobsen KH. Introduction to Health Research Methods: A Practical Guide. Sudbury, Mass: Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2012.

Recommended Resource:

  • Huff, D. How to lie with statistics. W. W. Norton & Co. 1954. 

          Note: This resource may be found within the Course Resources button in the course navigation menu. 

Learning Objectives and Outcomes

The coursework for APN 610 is intended to familiarize each student with the core components of research scholarship suitable for presentation in a professional forum, with an opportunity to apply that knowledge as consumers or producers of an original research product suitable for a portfolio, writing submission, IRB application or publication.

Throughout the course you are encouraged to consider the following questions: 1) How do we use research methods to ask important questions and find answers to those questions? 2) What research methodologies guide this journey to produce scientific evidence-based knowledge to contribute to a specific area of study? 3) What are the threats to our research? 4) Can we distinguish limitations and failings in scholarship to think critically and assess our increasing data-driven professions?

Course Outcomes

In this course you will learn how:

  • To distinguish the importance of ethics in research for the protection of human subjects.
  • To investigate and critique research problems
  • To evaluate relevant literature to formulate research questions and/or hypotheses.
  • To apply the tenets of qualitative and quantitative methods to scientific investigation.
  • To leverage statistical tools to describe, predict, and interpret real-world inquiry.
  • To formulate strategies for authoring, publishing, and funding research studies.

Program Objectives

This course will also satisfy the following program objectives:

  • Develop and utilize nutrition concepts and best-practices for nutrition and health promotion initiatives
  • Apply core research principles to measure the nutrition status and environment of individuals and communities
  • Interpret and modify complex explanations of complex nutrition concepts for various audiences
  • Research, develop and disseminate evidence-based and theory driven educational materials and work products at an audience appropriate level for topics related to nutrition and health promotion

 

Assignments

Discussion Board: Each week you will be asked to respond to a prompt, and foster discussion by responding to responses by classmates. Your success in the course relies on robust discussion, critical thinking, and peer-response. Weekly posts responding to prompts posed are meant to facilitate a deeper understanding of the broader themes of the course as well as enrich the readings, handouts, and lectures. Your initial response should be no less than 400 words. Peer-responses should be no less than 200 words and must be thoughtful, contain compliment as well as constructive criticism, and maintain a professional tone.

Please be sure to follow the individual directions provided with each Discussion Board Prompt, as the requirements may vary from Discussion Board to Discussion Board.

If the initial post and response are not submitted within the discussion week you will be given a zero. Posts submitted after the discussion week will not be graded.

Initial Blackboard posts are due each Sunday at 11:59 p.m. ET. Post peer-responses by Tuesday at 11:59 p.m. ET. Please note: All times refer to Eastern time.

Worksheets: You will complete a series of worksheets that are intended to help you build the skills necessary to succeed in this course. 

 

Final Project: You will be asked to complete a 4- page (approx. 1400 words, independent of reference section) conference-quality prospectus developing proposed research, and create an accompanying conference-style presentation. This is an opportunity to apply the skills and knowledge obtained in this course to individually tailored work products, for submission to professional conferences, publications, and/or career presentations.

Each student will propose quantitative OR qualitative research in one of four broad research areas to then narrow the scope for a final research proposal design: 1) health promotion, 2) disease prevention, 3) obesity, 4) social media. Students are encouraged to explore their chosen focus area of the Graduate Applied Nutrition Program, or explore another area of study.

Corresponding examples to the aforementioned research areas could address:

  • >Health promotion: Evaluate nutritional status and school environment of children using a survey, or
  • >Disease prevention: Propose a test of differences for community-based disease prevention, or
  • >Obesity: Design a rigorous qualitative in-depth interview study to assess obesity, or
  • >Social media: Propose a content analysis to assess health-related social media use.

Key Assessment tips for the prospectus and presentation can be found under the grading policy/rubric section of the syllabus. Writing and reflections developed through interaction with Discussion Board posts will advance sections of the proposal as the course progresses; applying knowledge from readings, lectures, course handouts, and learning objectives to the final project and professional advancement.

Each student will submit a 4- page, 1.5-spaced, 12-point font (Arial or Times New Roman) research prospectus. See Key Assessment Document for details.

Furthermore, in regard to all assignments, please observe the following:

  • All assignments must be completed using AMA formatting where appropriate.
  • All times refer to Eastern Time (ET).
  • All questions about assignments, and all questions in general, should be sent through email.
  • No extra credit will be made available.

Writing Statement

As professionals in the field, you will consistently be expected to clearly and concisely articulate advanced concepts for diverse audiences at a variety of educational levels.

Graduate students are expected to produce their best quality work, including screening their work prior to submission for clarity, grammatical, spelling, formatting and mechanical issues.

While there is often a portion of each assignment’s rubric dedicated specifically to grammar, spelling, mechanics, and formatting, it is critical to understand that failure to submit work that has been adequately proofed may result in a reduction of points in other areas of the rubric. These may include, but are not limited to metrics rating professionalism or content knowledge and synthesis; work submitted in graduate courses should provide evidence of strategic reading, writing, and academic speaking skills essential for success in the discipline.

Grading Policy

Your grade in this course will be determined by the following criteria:

Grade Breakdown

Discussion Board Posts and Responses (Including Abstract worth 8 pts.)34
Week 1 Quiz7
CITI Training7
Measures of Center and Spread Activity1
Quantitative Worksheets (3)15
G*Power Worksheets (2)8
Key Assessment (Research Prospectus and Presentation)25
E-Portfolio2
Student Syllabus Contract1
Total100

Grade Scale

Grade Points Grade Point Average (GPA)
A 94 – 100% 4.00
A- 90 – 93% 3.75
B+ 87 – 89% 3.50
B 84 – 86% 3.00
B- 80 – 83% 2.75
C+ 77 – 79% 2.50
C 74 – 76% 2.00
C- 70 – 73% 1.75
D 64 – 69% 1.00
F 00 – 63% 0.00

Schedule

Weekly Dates

Week One: 1/2 – 1/8

Week Two:  1/9 – 1/15

Week Three: 1/16 – 1/22

Week Four: 1/23 – 1/29

Week Five: 1/30 – 2/5

Week Six: 2/6 – 2/12

Week Seven: 2/13 – 2/19

Week Eight: 2/20 – 2/24

 

Major Due Dates

Week 1 Quiz

Tues., 1/8

CITI Training

Tues., 1/15

Worksheet #1

Tues., 1/22

G*Power Mini Assignment

Tues., 1/22

Worksheet #2

Tues., 1/29

Measures of Center Die Activity

Tues., 1/29

Worksheet #3

Tues., 2/5

G*Power Mini-Assignment #2

Tues., 2/5

Key Assessment, Part One: The Presentation

Tues., 2/12

Key Assessment, Part Two: The Research Prospectus

Tues., 2/19

Course Reflection/ePortfolio Piece

Sunday, 2/24

Discussion Board Prompts

Every Sunday and Tuesday 

(exception: only 1 post is required in Week 8, due on Sunday)

 

Please note all due date times are according to Eastern Time. If you have questions or concerns, please contact your instructor.

 

Week One: Applied Research Methods and Process

Weekly Learning Outcomes

  • Define the term “research” 
  • Describe types of research
  • Describe and discuss the importance of research in the healthcare professions
  • Begin to develop a scientific approach to study and practice
  • Identify research problems
  • Develop research questions
  • Recognize the importance of research ethics & protecting human subjects
  • Identify the markers of qualitative research

Lectures

  • Welcome and Introduction to APN 610 Research Methods
  • What is Research?
  • Theory in Research, Part One
  • Theory in Research, Part Two
  • Qualitative Overview
  • Slides and Video Resources

Required Readings

  • Jacobsen KH. Introduction to Health Research Methods: A Practical Guide. Sudbury, Mass: Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2012.
    • Chapter 1 The Health Research Process
    • Chapter 2 Selecting a General Topic
    • Chapter 3 Reviewing the Literature
    • Chapter 4 Focusing the Research Question
    • Chapter 32 Article Structure
  • Please carefully review the following 2 resources and complete the worksheet before participating in the discussion and this week’s Quiz.
    • How to Prepare a Research Proposal Al-Riyami Oman Med J. 2008 Apr;23(2):66-9
    • PICOT Worksheet
  • Scholarly peer-reviewed examples. To access peer-reviewed examples, please visit the following link, making sure you are signed into your UNE email: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B7DrOzH_NViUTXVMZERpSkk0NG8?usp=sharing
  • A Brief Guide to AMA Style
  • AMA Quick Guide

Recommended Readings

  • Research Glossary
  • RefWorks
  • Huff, D. How to lie with statistics. W. W. Norton & Co. 1954. (Intro, Ch 1 & 2)

          Note: this resource may be found within the Course Resources button within the course navigation menu. 

Discussions

Mini Literature Review

 

Week Two: Research Questions, Literature Review, and Ethical Practices

Weekly Learning Outcomes

  • This week we will conduct a systematic review of the literature and review:

    • How to develop research questions
    • Why one should review the literature
    • How to compile relevant literature for review
    • How to develop a framework for interpreting the literature
    • Explore ethics in research and gain credentials through training

Lectures

  • Developing Research Questions
  • Slides and Video Resources

Readings

  • Jacobsen KH. Introduction to Health Research Methods: A Practical Guide. Sudbury, Mass: Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2012.
    • Chapter 22 Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
    • Chapters 23 Ethical Considerations
    • Chapter 24 Ethical Review and Approval
  • A Credibility Crisis in Food Science – Please read the three articles listed below. The researcher misconduct scenario unfolded in the recent past and Dr. Wansink has now formally resigned his position at Cornell. This exemplifies precisely whywe are so focused on process and understanding appropriate methodology and analysis techniques!
    • Researcher Misconduct:
      • What is Food Science? The Atlantic
      • Cornell Researchers Downfall Raises Larger Questions for Science. NPR
      • Cornell Nutrition Scientist Resigns After Retractions and Research Misconduct Finding. Science

Recommended Readings

  • Huff, D. How to lie with statistics. W. W. Norton & Co. 1954. (Ch 3 & 4)

Assignments 

CITI Training (Please be aware these trainings take 4-6 hours, but do not need to be completed in one sitting. Please plan accordingly.)

Discussions

Discuss your literature review.

 

Week Three: Research Principles and Threats

Weekly Learning Outcomes

  • This week we will learn how to do the following:

    • Discern the importance of power analyses in research design development
    • Expand our knowledge of qualitative studies
    • Apply core research principles to answer research questions·   
    • Identify common threats to research
    • Explore survey development and recognize the importance of pretested validated survey instrument

Lectures

  • Surveys
  • Quantitative Worksheet Overview
  • JNEB Journal Club
  • Slides and Video Resources

Readings

  • Jacobsen KH. Introduction to Health Research Methods: A Practical Guide. Sudbury, Mass: Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2012.
    • Chapter 7 Overview of Study Designs
    • Chapter 8 Case Series
    • Chapter 9 Cross-sectional Surveys
    • Chapter 10 Case-Control Studies
    • Chapter 11 Cohort Studies
    • Chapter 12 Experimental Studies
    • Chapter 13 Qualitative Studies
    • Chapter 14 Correlational Studies
  • A Very Lucky Wind – Listening to this podcast is instrumental to completion of the worksheets in the course moving forward.
  • G*Power Data Analysis Examples

Recommended Readings

  • Huff, D. How to lie with statistics. W. W. Norton & Co. 1954. (Ch 5 & 6)

Assignments 

Worksheet #1

G*Power Mini-Assignment (1)

Discussions

Discuss the various types of studies and their relationship to your chosen research area.

 

Week Four: Variables, Statistical Tests, Levels of Measurement, and Sampling Strategies

Weekly Learning Outcomes

  • Identify variables
  • Choose a statistical test
  • Assess levels of measurement
  • Identify a sampling strategy and analytic approach

Lectures

  • Slides and Video Resources

Readings

  • Jacobsen KH. Introduction to Health Research Methods: A Practical Guide. Sudbury, Mass: Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2012.
    • Chapter 15 Research Protocols
    • Chapter 16 Population Sampling
    • Chapter 17 Sample Size Estimation
    • Chapter 18 Questionnaire Development
    • Chapter 19 Surveys and Interviews
    • Chapter 20 Additional Assessments
    • Chapter 21 Secondary Analyses

Recommended Readings

  • Quantitative Data Analysis Doc (Chambliss, Making Sense  of the Social World, pp. 154-178, Chapter 8)
  • Huff, D. How to lie with statistics. W. W. Norton & Co. 1954. (Ch 7 & 8)

Assignments 

Quantitative Worksheet #2

Measures of Center & Measures of Spread Activity (Dice + Die Distribution Experiment Document)

Discussions

Discuss how you will use descriptive and or inferential statistics in your research design for the final presentation and research prospectus.

 

Week Five: Correlation, ANOVA, and Data Management

Weekly Learning Outcomes

  • This week we will learn how to:

    • Look beyond a simple test of two group means
    • Apply concepts of descriptive statistics
    • Form analysis strategies for quantitative data
    • Identify and interpret a linear relationship 
    • Recognize best practices for Data Management
    • Considerations for health professionals involved in clinical investigations

Lectures

  • Slides and Video Resources

Readings

  • Jacobsen KH. Introduction to Health Research Methods: A Practical Guide. Sudbury, Mass: Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2012.
    • Chapter 26 Data Management
    • Chapter 27 Descriptive Statistics
    • Chapter 28 Comparative Statistics

Recommended Readings

  • Huff, D. How to lie with statistics. W. W. Norton & Co. 1954. (Ch 9 & 10)

Assignments 

Quantitative Worksheet #3

G*Power Mini-Assignment #2

Discussions

Discuss CBPR and how it might apply to your future research.

 

Week Six: Communicating Findings and Critically Revising

Weekly Learning Outcomes

  • This week we will learn how to:

    • Make a video presentation
    • Present the proposed research to your peers
    • Articulate the importance of the results section
    • Recognize the essentials of writing and communicating findings
    • Review citing the ideas and work of others

Lectures

  • Report your Findings
  • Slides and Video Resources

Readings

  • Jacobsen KH. Introduction to Health Research Methods: A Practical Guide. Sudbury, Mass: Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2012.
    • Chapter 31 Posters and Presentations
    • REVIEW: Chapter 32 Article structure (from Week 1)
    • REVIEW: Al-Riyami (from Week 1)
    • Chapter 33 Citing
    • Chapter 34 Critically Revising

Assignments 

Key Assessment, Part One: Presentation

Discussions

Share a YouTube link to your presentation.

 

Week Seven: References, Academic Integrity, and Style

Weekly Learning Outcomes

  • Describe the importance of references and academic integrity
  • Discuss the importance of analysis and finding your style
  • Identify strategies for writing

Lectures

  • Discussion Section
  • References
  • Slides and Video Resources

Readings

  • Jacobsen KH. Introduction to Health Research Methods: A Practical Guide. Sudbury, Mass: Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2012.
    • Chapter 35 Writing Success Strategies
  • Please read the “Abstract” section of http://www.andjrnl.org/content/authorinfo

Assignments 

Key Assessment Part Two: The Research Prospectus

Discussions

Share your abstract.

 

Week Eight: Finding Funding and Publishing your Research

Weekly Learning Outcomes

  • This week you will learn how to:

    • Action steps for making the prospectus a reality
    • To communicate with scholars in your field
    • Strategies for publishing
    • How to identify the value of scientific inquiry
    • How to identify research funding resources
    • How to target professional journals

Lectures

  • Week 8 Introduction
  • Publishing
  • Video Resources

Readings

  • Jacobsen KH. Introduction to Health Research Methods: A Practical Guide. Sudbury, Mass: Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2012.
    • Chapter 36 Reasons to Publish
    • Chapter 37 Selecting Target Journals
    • Chapter 38 Manuscript Submissions
    • Chapter 39 Review, Submission, and Publication

Assignments 

E-Portfolio

Discussions

Reflect on your progress in the past weeks.

Student Resources

Online Student Support

Your Student Support Specialist is a resource for you. Please don't hesitate to contact them for assistance, including, but not limited to course planning, current problems or issues in a course, technology concerns, or personal emergencies.

Questions? Visit the Student Support Applied Nutrition page

UNE Libraries:

UNE Student Academic Success Center

The Student Academic Success Center (SASC) offers a range of services to support your academic achievement, including tutoring, writing support, test prep and studying strategies, learning style consultations, and many online resources. To make an appointment for tutoring, writing support, or a learning specialist consultation, go to une.tutortrac.com. To access our online resources, including links, guides, and video tutorials, please visit:

Information Technology Services (ITS)

  • ITS Contact: Toll Free Help Desk 24 hours/7 days per week at 1-877-518-4673

Accommodations

Any student who would like to request, or ask any questions regarding, academic adjustments or accommodations must contact the Student Access Center at (207) 221-4438 or pcstudentaccess@une.edu. Student Access Center staff will evaluate the student's documentation and determine eligibility of accommodation(s) through the Student Access Center registration procedure.

Policies

AMA Writing Style Statement

In keeping with the requirements of the Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics and the Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, the American Medical Association (AMA) Manual of Style, 11th edition is the required writing format for this course and is available at both UNE libraries under the title "AMA Manual." Additional support for academic writing and AMA format is provided throughout the coursework as well as at the UNE Portal for Online Students.

Online resources: AMA Style Guide

Turnitin Originality Check and Plagiarism Detection Tool

The College of Professional Studies uses Turnitin to help deter plagiarism and to foster the proper attribution of sources. Turnitin provides comparative reports for submitted assignments that reflect similarities in other written works. This can include, but is not limited to, previously submitted assignments, internet articles, research journals, and academic databases.

Make sure to cite your sources appropriately as well as use your own words in synthesizing information from published literature. Webinars and workshops, included early in your coursework, will help guide best practices in AMA citation and academic writing.

You can learn more about Turnitin in the Turnitin Student quick start guide.

Technology Requirements

Please review the technical requirements for UNE Online Graduate Programs: Technical Requirements

Course Evaluation Policy

Course surveys are one of the most important tools that University of New England uses for evaluating the quality of your education, and for providing meaningful feedback to instructors on their teaching. In order to assure that the feedback is both comprehensive and precise, we need to receive it from each student for each course. Evaluation access is distributed via UNE email at the beginning of the last week of the course.

Attendance Policy

Online students are required to submit a graded assignment/discussion prior to Sunday evening at 11:59 pm ET of the first week of the term. If a student does not submit a posting to the graded assignment/discussion prior to Sunday evening at 11:59 pm ET, the student will be automatically dropped from the course for non-participation. Review the full attendance policy.

Late Policy

Assignments: Late assignments will be accepted up to 3 days late; however, there is a 10% grade reduction (from the total points) for the late submission. After three days the assignment will not be accepted.

Discussion posts: If the initial post is submitted late, but still within the discussion board week, there will be a 10% grade reduction from the total discussion grade (e.g., a 3 point discussion will be reduced by 0.3 points). Any posts submitted after the end of the Discussion Board week will not be graded.

Please make every effort ahead of time to contact your instructor and your student support specialist if you are not able to meet an assignment deadline. Arrangements for extenuating circumstances may be considered by faculty.

Student Handbook Online - Policies and Procedures

The policies contained within this document apply to all students in the College of Graduate and Professional Studies. It is each student's responsibility to know the contents of this handbook.

UNE Online Student Handbook

UNE Course Withdrawal

Please contact your student support specialist if you are considering dropping or withdrawing from a course. The last day to drop for 100% tuition refund is the 2nd day of the course. Financial Aid charges may still apply. Students using Financial Aid should contact the Financial Aid Office prior to withdrawing from a course.

Academic Integrity

The University of New England values academic integrity in all aspects of the educational experience. Academic dishonesty in any form undermines this standard and devalues the original contributions of others. It is the responsibility of all members of the University community to actively uphold the integrity of the academy; failure to act, for any reason, is not acceptable. For information about plagiarism and academic misconduct, please visit UNE Plagiarism Policies.

Academic dishonesty includes, but is not limited to the following:

  1. Cheating, copying, or the offering or receiving of unauthorized assistance or information.
  2. Fabrication or falsification of data, results, or sources for papers or reports.
  3. Action which destroys or alters the work of another student.
  4. Multiple submissions of the same paper or report for assignments in more than one course without permission of each instructor.
  5. Plagiarism, the appropriation of records, research, materials, ideas, or the language of other persons or writers and the submission of them as one's own.

Charges of academic dishonesty will be reviewed by the Program Director. Penalties for students found responsible for violations may depend upon the seriousness and circumstances of the violation, the degree of premeditation involved, and/or the student’s previous record of violations.  Appeal of a decision may be made to the Dean whose decision will be final.  Student appeals will take place through the grievance process outlined in the student handbook.