Syllabus

Master of Social Work

SSW 565 Administration & Supervision

Credits - 3

Description

Administration & Supervision (SSW 565) is the second in a series of required courses for students in the Organization & Community Practice concentration. Focusing on nonprofit organizations and other complex systems, this course builds upon content form foundation year courses and SSW 564 while introducing new concepts to examine administrative roles within the context of competing organizational values. Drawing upon classic contemporary theories related to all aspects of governance and administration of HHSOs and other complex systems, this course provides students with knowledge and skill needed to assume leadership position at multiple levels of administrative, management and supervisory practice. Students will be prepared to engage in empowering macro-level practice as leaders of sustainable, equitable and diverse programs, organizations and complex systems that promote universal human rights, social and economic justice and health, combat and dismantle barriers to human dignity and equity and promote change in oppressive organizations and community structures.

Materials

Required:

  • The Community Tool Box – This is an online resource that focuses on “Promoting community health and development by connecting people, ideas and resources” (its mission) in order to create social change and community health. It is an ongoing developing resource sponsored and managed by the Work Group for Community Health and Development at the University of Kansas. It is available at no cost.
  • Assorted professional journal articles and briefs.

Learning Objectives and Outcomes

School of Social Work Program Outcomes:

Graduates of the UNE SSWO will demonstrate knowledge, skills, and leadership in the following:

  1. Demonstrates ethical and professional behavior.
  2. Advance human rights and social, racial, economic, and environmental justice.
  3. Engage in anti-racism, diversity, equity, and inclusion (ADEI) in practice.
  4. Engage in practice-informed research and research-informed practice.
  5. Engage in policy practice.
  6. Engage with individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities.
  7. Assess individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities.
  8. Intervene with individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities.
  9. Evaluate practice with individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities.

Course Objectives

Upon successful completion of this course, students will:

  1. Possess an enhanced awareness of administrative practice in the context of human service organizations and an understanding of administrative practice roles and essential skills in terms of competing organizational values and needs.
  2. Possess an enhanced awareness of classic and contemporary theories of leadership and the variety of administrative practice roles, e.g., management, supervision, consultation, mentoring, etc.
  3. Have an expanded understanding of and ability to apply the UN Declaration of Human Rights, social work ethics and other relevant professional standards as leaders of sustainable, equitable and diverse HHSOs and other complex systems.
  4. Be able to analyze and evaluate the impact of policies and social contexts on the leadership and administration of nonprofit HHSOs and other complex systems.
  5. Have an advanced understanding of the impact of leadership and administration on environmental structures and conditions on the health of people, organizations and communities.
  6. Have a thorough understanding of the role social workers can play as leaders of HHSOs in combating barriers to equity, social justice and health as a human right and promoting empowerment.
  7. Be sensitive to and understand cultural diversity in leadership and administrative practice in HHSOs.
  8. Serve as leaders for the development and implementation of integrated and interdisciplinary practice in HHSOs.
  9. Have an expanded knowledge of, skills in and appreciation for the use of research and program and community evaluation as leadership and administration tools.
  10. Be able to identify their strengths and limitations to serve as leaders in HHSOs.
  11. Develop skills and understanding of the planning function of management and the value and utility of “action plans” used in program implementation, “evaluation planning” that address accountability and “logic models” that clearly describe program mission, goals, activities and outputs and impact.

Educational Outcomes

Through the completion of their assignments, students will demonstrate their ability to:

  1. Utilize concepts from foundation and advanced-year curricula to enhance their awareness and understanding of classic and contemporary theories of leadership and administrative practice.
  2. Understand and apply principles found in the U.N. Declaration of Human Rights, social work ethics and other relevant professional standards in the leadership of sustainable, equitable and diverse HHSOs and other complex systems.
  3. Analyze and evaluate the impact of policies and social contexts on the leadership and administration of nonprofit HHSOs and other complex systems.
  4. Understand the impact of leadership and administration on environmental structures and conditions on the health of people, organizations and communities.
  5. Understand the role social workers can play as leaders of HHSOs in combating barriers to equity, social justice and health as a human right and promoting empowerment.
  6. Explore cultural diversity in relation to leadership and administrative practice in HHSOs.
  7. Recognize the need for and utilize integrated and interdisciplinary models of HHSOs.
  8. Utilize knowledge of administrative practice roles and essential skills in the context of program and community evaluation.
  9. Identify their own leadership skills and decision making styles and have an awareness of their strengths and challenges to serve as leaders in HHSOs.
  10. Develop an understanding of the political, economic and service environments that form the external context of agency functioning and the administrative roles and skills needed to be effective in these external environments.
  11. Develop an understanding of organizational “life-cycles” and the types of administrative practice roles appropriate at each stage of development.
  12. Possess an understanding of the basic functions of the management, leadership, supervisory and other roles in administrative practice, i.e. planning, monitoring, controlling and organizing.
  13. Possess an understanding of the practice theories that inform administrative practice, e.g., McGregor’s “Theory X”, Bandura’s cognitive learning or social learning theory, Maslow’s theory of motivation, political-economic exchange theories, systems theory, change theory.
  14. Develop an understanding of collaborative models of agency practice, coalition building, advocacy, community and program development, service system coordination and management.
  15. Demonstrate an understanding and skill using different types of decision making and an awareness of one’s own decision making style.
  16. Demonstrate an understanding of the various types of leadership and leadership skills needed in administrative practice, e.g., transactional leadership, transformational leadership.
  17. Demonstrate an awareness of group dynamics and team building in the context of macro practice, e.g., management teams, committees, task-forces, coalitions, service teams.
  18. Demonstrate an understanding and awareness of one’s own behavior and effectiveness as a team member.

Assignments

Learning Activities

A variety of learning activities are designed to support the course objectives, facilitate different learning styles, and build a community of learners. Learning activities for each module include the following:

Readings:

The primary reading material that will be used in this course will be a review of the professional literature on administrative roles in social work practice. Articles to accompany the topical assignments are assigned each week and are grouped using an organizing framework that discusses administrative practice roles in the context of competing and at times conflicting organizational values and needs.

All of the assigned reading material is intended to expose students to current knowledge in macro- social work practice as well as challenge assumptions and encourage critical analysis and discussion of topical material.

Discussions:

Student and instructor discussions will occur through the multiple discussion boards and small group discussion boards. The discussions should be concise, coherent, and reflect a reasoned debate of the content and topical issues. Neither change nor learning occurs without a thoughtful and thorough discussion of the issues.

Grading and Feedback Method: Discussions are vital components of education. In this course, the key element of all assignments is the demonstration of critical thinking and application of content to social work practice. Graduate social work education provides students with the opportunity to create new knowledge and understanding in each domain of social work practice, e.g. micro, mezzo and macro practice. The instructor will look for demonstration of critical thinking and application of content and respond to students individually and as a class to help refine, enhance and correct discussion content.

Writing Assignments, Projects and Assessments:

Description: SSW 565 is a reading-intensive course. In an effort to reduce the volume of readings, students are asked in each module to select from a group of assigned readings and complete a synopsis of the article that is then shared with other students for discussion. In this way a far larger number of articles can be introduced into the course. Students are assigned to a “reading group” and the group then develops an initial “action plan” to divide the reading workload each week. Each week, group members share their synopsis and discuss the readings in their small group discussion. Journal and on-line articles and reports are the primary source of readings in SSW 565. The assigned readings should also be used to frame written assignments where appropriate and also in discussion with classmates and with the course instructor.

Since this is the last advance-year OCP concentration course, students are also expected to expand their knowledge and seek out literature that more specifically addresses their practice theories. For assistance in your literature search, seek guidance from your UNE advisor, your instructor or fellow students. Students will use the expanded-knowledge literature to respond to assignments throughout the course, and especially in completion of the final assignments where students are expected to clearly state what the administrative practice roles, practice theories that inform them and the skills needed to be effective.

The strategies used by the reading group to organize the workload and prepare their synopsis will be determined by consensus among group members. The strategy and “ground-rules” should be summarized briefly in the initial “action plan” developed through a consensus on task, time-lines and roles. The synopsis format will be determined by the reading group, however, all synopses should include a critical analysis of the reading content and its applicability to leadership and administrative practice. Synopsis should be no longer than one, single-sided, double-spaced page with one-inch margins in Times New Roman 12-point Font.

Description: Written assignments in this course are designed to help students develop their professional writing skills as well as express the understanding of course content. Social workers at every level of practice work in multiple, complex and challenging environments. It is therefore important for practitioners to be able to explain social work concepts in coherent and concise written statements. Course projects are intended to build upon each other. That is, the student’s first submitted assignment should be the foundation upon which all other assignments are built. Students should be able to see the development of their understanding and learning through the completion and grading of peer responses to each assignment. Writing in this course also should be used as an opportunity to submit your ideas and questions to peer consultants for comments and critiques. This course provides you with an opportunity for consultation from a large number of people who are studying and dealing with the same practice issues.

All of the assignments are intended to provide students with a supportive building process that will lead to a finished ideal program or initiative. Multiple domains of learning, understanding and expression are incorporated so that the finished product is not just a task to check off, but reflects the best thinking students have to dismantle barriers to human dignity and health. To be effective in administrative practice, one needs to have an understanding and competency in multiple roles and possess multiple skills appropriate for a variety of organizational contexts.

The written assignments ask students to focus on being concise and critical. Students are encouraged to engage in ample reflection before they start their writing assignments. Most assignments provide students with the opportunity to reflect upon and express their practice theories and to receive feedback from their faculty member and their classmates.

Grading and Feedback Method: Assignments that are graded will be reviewed by the instructor and comments will be noted on the assignment. The key element of all assignments is the student’s demonstration of critical thinking and application of content to social work practice. Graduate social work education provides students with the opportunity to expand their understanding and create new knowledge to inform and advance social work practice. Mere completion of a course assignment should not be the goal of one’s participation and advancing their knowledge of administrative roles and developing a greater sense of their capacities and skills should be the aim of everyone in the course. Feedback from fellow faculty and classmates should be based on curiosity and critical analysis, focused on moving understanding to broader and deeper levels. Most of all, feedback and critiques should be respectful and concise.

Due Dates: Due dates for all learning activities are provided in the “Course Schedule.”

Grading Policy

The School of Social Work uses the following grading system for all courses with the exception of field education courses. Students are expected to maintain a “B” (3.0) average over the course of their study. Students with less than a GPA of 3.0 will be placed on academic probation. Students must have an overall GPA of 3.0 in order to receive their Master’s Degree.

Your grade in this course will be determined by the following criteria:

Grade Breakdown

AssignmentPoint ValuePercentage of total grade
Discussion Participation400 points (50 points x 8 weeks)40%
Reading Analysis Summaries – All Weeks Combined100 points10%
Ottawa Charter Draft and Feedback10 points for draft and 40 points for feedback1% and 4% respectively
Final Ottawa Charter Assignment50 points5%
Module Five Preferred Administrative Practice Assignment100 points10%
Module Eight Final Paper300 points30%
Total1,000 points100%

Grade Scale

Grade Points Grade Point Average (GPA)
A 94 – 100% 4.00
A- 90 – 93% 3.75
B+ 87 – 89% 3.50
B 84 – 86% 3.00
B- 80 – 83% 2.75
C+ 77 – 79% 2.50
C 74 – 76% 2.00
C- 70 – 73% 1.75
D 64 – 69% 1.00
F 00 – 63% 0.00

Schedule

Course Dates: March 2, 2016 through April 24, 2016

All assignments are to be submitted by 11:59 p.m. E.S.T. on the dates listed below. Unless otherwise specified below, all module discussions and assignments are due the last day of the module or unit week. 

Student Resources Portal to be visited prior to starting Module 1. 

MODULE 1
The Context of Human Services Organizations
Dates: 03/02/16 – 03/08/16

  • Required Readings: The Community Tool Box readings, required group readings, select a number of readings from the list
  • Discussions:
    • Readings Small Group Discussion, 
    • Small Group Reflection/Discussion
  • Assignments: Ottawa Charter Assignment Introduction

MODULE 2
Coordination, Integration and the Control of Time, Effort and Resources: Efficiency and the Basic Functions of the Management Role in Administration
Dates: 03/09/16 – 03/15/16

  • Required Readings: The Community Tool Box, Peer Consultation document, Ottawa Charter
  • Discussions: Administrative Practice Small Group Discussions, Readings Small Group Discussion
  • Assignment: Ottawa Charter Assignment – continue working

MODULE 3
Managing the “Human Side of Enterprise”: The Human Relations Roles of Supervision, Consultation, Mentoring and Facilitation
Dates: 03/16/16 – 03/22/16

  • Required Readings: Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion, websites and articles as assigned
  • Discussions: 
    • Ottawa Charter Small Group Discussion,
    • Readings Small Group Discussion,
    • Administrative Practice Small Group Discussion 
  • Assignments: 
    • Ottawa Charter Assignment – Draft Submission (by Sunday), Peer Review and Self-Assessment of Ottawa Charter (by Tuesday)

MODULE 4
The External Environment: Boundary Spanning and Adaptation to Political and Economic Opportunity and Uncertainty
Dates: 03/23/16 – 03/29/16

  • Required Readings: Websites and articles as assigned
  • Discussions: 
    • Readings Small Group Discussion, 
    • Management/Supervisor Small Group Discussion 
  • Assignment:  
    • Preferred Administrative Practice Assignment Introduction
    • Ottawa Charter – Final Submission

MODULE 5
Directing the Organization to Produce Quality Outcomes: Performance and Accountability
Dates: 03/30/16 – 04/05/16  

  • Readings: The Community Tool Box, websites and articles as assigned
  • Discussions: 
    • Administrative Practice Discussion: Decision Making
    • Readings Small Group Discussion, 
    • Preferred Administrative Practice Small Group Discussion (post by Saturday, feedback by Monday)
  • Assignment:
    • Preferred Administrative Practice Assignment Submission (by Tuesday)
    • Final Assignment Introduction

MODULE 6
Leadership Issues in Administrative Practice
Dates: 04/06/16 – 04/12/16  

  • Readings: websites and articles as assigned
  • Discussions:
    • Readings Small Group Discussion, 
    • Administrative Practice Discussion: Preferred Leadership Style
  • Assignment: Final Assignment – Continue working (Due in Module 8 by Wednesday)

MODULE 7
Administrative Practice with Teams
Dates: 04/13/16 – 04/19/16

  • Readings: A kind word for Theory X: Or why so many newfangled management techniques quickly fail 
  • Discussions: 
    • Final Assignment Small Group Discussion;
    • Readings Small Group Discussion
  • Assignment: Final Assignment – Continue Working (Due next week by Wednesday!)

MODULE 8
Course Summary and Sharing Knowledge
Dates: 04/20/16 – 04/24/16

  • Readings: read peers’ final assignments in the group discussion forum
  • Discussions:
    • Final Reflection Whole Class Discussion;
    • Final Assignment Group Discussion
  • Assignment: Final Assignment Submission by Wednesday to the Instructor and the Group

Student Resources

Online Student Support

Your Student Support Specialist is a resource for you. Please don't hesitate to contact them for assistance, including, but not limited to course planning, current problems or issues in a course, technology concerns, or personal emergencies.

Questions? Visit the Student Support Social Work page

UNE Libraries:

Information Technology Services (ITS)

ITS Contact: Toll Free Help Desk 24 hours/7 days per week at 1-877-518-4673

Policies

Written Work:

All written work should be typed and double-spaced. The papers should include footnotes and bibliography (APA format) as appropriate. Students who are not clear about proper format are encouraged to consult the UNE Student Academic Success Center or various libraries, online, and other resources to get this information (click on “University Resources” under “Getting Started” to access these resources). Material obtained from the Internet should be referenced and limited to recognized scholarly, academic, or client/consumer-oriented sources (such as on-line journals and information from advocacy oriented organizations). Gender-neutral language should be used throughout all written assignments.

Extensions and incompletes: Under normal circumstances, there will be no extensions for papers or other assignments, or incompletes for the course. If you have concerns about an assignment, please discuss with the instructor well in advance of the due date. If you have reason to believe that you will be unable to complete the work, contact the Course Instructor immediately.

Plagiarism:

The MSW degree is given recognition of a student’s personal achievement. All work submitted by students for assessment is accepted on the understanding that it is the student’s own effort. Plagiarism is defined as the submission or presentation of work, in any form, which is not one’s own, without acknowledgment of the sources. Special cases of plagiarism can also arise from one student copying another student’s work or from inappropriate collaboration, or in the case of online courses, using direct content of online postings from other students.

Weekly Participation:

Meaningful participation is expected of any student who enrolls in this course. All students’ learning will be affected by the quality and quantity of the student’s participation. As most everyone is aware, quantity does not necessarily equal quality. There is no required or prescribed number of comments as the focus in all discussion is on quality rather than quantity. The student decides upon the quality and quantity in their posted remarks. Discussion comments should articulate a critical analysis of the topical materials and to demonstrate the depth of your understanding and familiarity with the topical material under discussion. A critical analysis is a reasoned discussion of the material presented and a questioning of the various theories, definitions, evidence and implications for practice and/or policy. Citations are recommended and are not always required but they do add credibility to your comments and support your position. Any student who does not participate in a meaningful manner potentially is affecting other students’ learning, which is a class management item that students are expected to address in one of their first assignments. Meaningful Participation is required to receive credit for the course. The definition of “meaningful participation” is that your comments must be related to the course topic under discussion, respectful, and grammatically correct. It is recommended that you make initial posts by Saturday of the week to contribute to the discussion boards.

All posts to the discussion boards should be completed by 11:59 p.m. EST of last day of the module as indicated in the “Course Schedule.” Any discussions that extend beyond that date and time will not be considered a part of the grade and/or assignment, but rather optional reading. Posts that no longer relate to the identified topic should be moved to one of the on-going discussion boards such as “Ask Your Instructor,” “Hallway Discussions,” or “Resources.”

Netiquette Policy:

All communications in this course (email, discussion boards, and assignments) should use good netiquette. This would also apply to your future courses. For an overview and explanation of this, visit the Netiquette Home Page and follow the Core Rules of Netiquette.

Late Policy:

All assignments are expected to be completed by the day and time noted in the Modules. If students think that their work will not be submitted on time, they should contact the Instructor and explain the circumstances that will prevent them from submitting their assignment on time. The Instructor will determine if the assignment will be accepted for full credit at a later date.

Essential Academic and Technical Standards

Please review the essential academic and technical standards of the University of New England School Social Work (SSW): https://online.une.edu/social-work/academic-and-technical-standards-une-online-ssw/

Turnitin Originality Check and Plagiarism Detection Tool

The College of Professional Studies uses Turnitin to help deter plagiarism and to foster the proper attribution of sources. Turnitin provides comparative reports for submitted assignments that reflect similarities in other written works. This can include, but is not limited to, previously submitted assignments, internet articles, research journals, and academic databases.

Make sure to cite your sources appropriately as well as use your own words in synthesizing information from published literature. Webinars and workshops, included early in your coursework, will help guide best practices in APA citation and academic writing.

You can learn more about Turnitin in the guide on how to navigate your Similarity Report.

Technology Requirements

Please review the technical requirements for UNE Online Graduate Programs: Technical Requirements

Confidentiality Statement

Student and faculty participation in this course will be governed by standards in the NASW Code of Ethics relating to confidentiality in sharing information from their placement sites and practice experiences. Students should be aware that personal information they choose to share in class, class assignments or conversations with faculty does not have the status of privileged information.

Late Policy

Assignments: Late assignments will be accepted up to 3 days late; however, there is a 10% grade reduction (from the total points) for the late submission. After three days the assignment will not be accepted.

Discussion posts: If the initial post is submitted late, but still within the discussion board week, there will be a 10% grade reduction from the total discussion grade (e.g., a 3 point discussion will be reduced by 0.3 points). Any posts submitted after the end of the Discussion Board week will not be graded.

Please make every effort ahead of time to contact your instructor and your student support specialist if you are not able to meet an assignment deadline. Arrangements for extenuating circumstances may be considered by faculty.