This course explores the importance and various means of sharing scholarly work. Students will learn about abstract writing, poster presentations, journal submissions, and peer reviews, as they finalize and present a high quality written product created during their Advanced Elective (GPH 751, 752, 0r 753). In this course, students will also reflect on public health competencies attained.
PC 1. Synthesize and incorporate scientific evidence into professional writing.
PC 2. Search databases and critically analyze peer-reviewed literature
PC 3. Develop strategies for qualitative and quantitative data management.
PC 4. Evaluate the use of financial resources and management techniques by public health programs to achieve goals and sustainability.
PC 5. Evaluate the use of technological applications in health interventions
FC 1. Apply epidemiological methods to the breadth of settings and situations in public health practice
FC 2. Select quantitative and qualitative data collection methods appropriate for a given public health context
FC 3. Analyze quantitative and qualitative data using biostatistics, informatics, computer-based programming and software, as appropriate
FC 4. Interpret results of data analysis for public health research, policy or practice
FC 5. Compare the organization, structure and function of health care, public health, and regulatory systems across national and international settings.
FC 6. Discuss the means by which structural bias, social inequities and racism undermine health and create challenges for achieving health equity at the organizational, community and societal levels.
FC 7. Assess population needs, assets, and capacities that affect communities’ health
FC 8. Apply the awareness of cultural values and practices to the design or implementation of public health policies or programs
FC 9. Design a population-based policy, program, project or intervention
FC 10. Explain basic principles and tools of budget and resource management
FC 11. Select methods to evaluate public health programs
FC 12. Discuss multiple dimensions of the policy-making process, including the roles of ethics and evidence
FC 13. Propose strategies to identify stakeholders and build coalitions and partnerships for influencing public health outcomes
FC 14. Advocate for political, social or economic policies and programs that will improve health in diverse populations
FC 15. Evaluate policies for their impact on public health and health equity
FC 16. Apply principles of leadership, governance, and management, which include creating a vision, empowering others, fostering collaboration and guiding decision making
FC 17. Apply negotiation and mediation skills to address organizational or community challenges
FC 18. Select communication strategies for different audiences and sectors
FC 19. Communicate audience-appropriate public health content, both in writing and through oral presentation
FC 20. Describe the importance of cultural competence in communicating public health content
FC 21. Perform effectively on interprofessional teams
FC 22. Apply systems thinking tools to a public health issue
There are several discussions in this course. Please read directions carefully as some discussions require peer responses in addition to the initial post. Please review due dates for the initial post for every discussion.
If the initial post is submitted late, but still within the discussion board week, there will be a 10% grade reduction from the total discussion grade (e.g., a 3-point discussion will be reduced by 0.3 points). Any posts submitted after the end of the Discussion Board week will not be graded.
Your grade in this course will be determined by the following criteria:
Assignment | Points |
---|---|
Week 1 Discussion | 8 Points |
Week 1 Abstract Submission | 12 Points |
Week 2 Discussion | 8 Points |
Week 2 Initial Paper Submission | 6 Points |
Week 3 Discussion | 4 Points |
Week 4 Final Paper and Abstract Submission | 6 Points |
Week 5 Discussion | 4 Points |
Week 5 Poster Submission | 12 Points |
Week 5 Poster Feedback | 4 Points |
Week 6 Discussion | 4 Points |
Week 6 Presentation Slides Submission | 4 Points |
Week 7 Reflection Assignment | 4 Points |
Week 8 Oral Presentation | 20 Points |
Week 8 Peer Feedback on Oral Presentations | 2 Points x 2 |
Total | 100 Points |
Grade | Points Grade | Point Average (GPA) |
A | 94 – 100% | 4.00 |
A- | 90 – 93% | 3.75 |
B+ | 87 – 89% | 3.50 |
B | 84 – 86% | 3.00 |
B- | 80 – 83% | 2.75 |
C+ | 77 – 79% | 2.50 |
C | 74 – 76% | 2.00 |
C- | 70 – 73% | 1.75 |
D | 64 – 69% | 1.00 |
F | 00 – 63% | 0.00 |
Each week opens on Wednesday at 12:01 AM Eastern Time. Each week closes on Wednesday at 11:59 pm ET, with the exception of Week 8, which ends on Sunday.
Week 1: Jan 6 – Jan 13
Week 2: Jan 13 – Jan 20
Week 3: Jan 20 – Jan 27
Week 4: Jan 27 – Feb 3
Week 5: Feb 3 – Feb 10
Week 6: Feb 10 – Feb 17
Week 7: Feb 17 – Feb 24
Week 8: Feb 24 – Feb 28
*See Blackboard for required and suggested weekly readings.
Week 2 Discussion
Initial Post: For the initial post, please elaborate on how through your AE experience you were able to achieve your selected competencies. Provide 2 or 3 examples within each selected competency on how your AE experiences helped you achieve the competency.
Note: if changes to your competencies are needed as a result of unanticipated changes/barriers be sure to discuss any proposed competency changes with your ILE supervisor.
Title your post with AE course number and selected competency numbers, e.g., GPH 753 Foundational Competencies: 1,2.3…; Program Competencies: 1,2.3.
Response Posts: For your responses to others, review the initial post of two peers who achieved different competencies than you. Review and ask meaningful questions about the importance/relevance of the selected competencies for the peer’s personal and professional development.
Initial posts are due Sunday by 11:59 pm ET, and the response to peers is due Wednesday by 11:59 pm ET. Any posts submitted after the end of the Discussion Board week will not be graded.
Your Student Support Specialist is a resource for you. Please don't hesitate to contact them for assistance, including, but not limited to course planning, current problems or issues in a course, technology concerns, or personal emergencies.
Questions? Visit the Student Support Public Health page
UNE's Student Academic Success Center (SASC) offers a range of free online services to support your academic achievement. Writing support, ESOL support, study strategy and learning style consultations, as well as downloadable resources, are available to all matriculating students. The SASC also offers tutoring for GPH 712 Epidemiology, GPH 716 Biostatistics, GPH 717 Applied Epidemiology, GPH 718 Biostatistics II, and GPH 719 Research Methods. To make an appointment for any of these services, go to une.tutortrac.com. For more information and to view and download writing and studying resources, please visit:
Any student who would like to request, or ask any questions regarding, academic adjustments or accommodations must contact the Student Access Center at (207) 221-4438 or pcstudentaccess@une.edu. Student Access Center staff will evaluate the student's documentation and determine eligibility of accommodation(s) through the Student Access Center registration procedure.
Togetherall is a 24/7 communication and emotional support platform monitored by trained clinicians. It’s a safe place online to get things off your chest, have conversations, express yourself creatively, and learn how to manage your mental health. If sharing isn’t your thing, Togetherall has other tools and courses to help you look after yourself with plenty of resources to explore. Whether you’re struggling to cope, feeling low, or just need a place to talk, Togetherall can help you explore your feelings in a safe supportive environment. You can join Togetherall using your UNE email address.
Students should notify their Student Support Specialist and instructor in the event of a problem relating to a course. This notification should occur promptly and proactively to support timely resolution.
ITS Contact: Toll-Free Help Desk 24 hours/7 days per week at 1-877-518-4673.
The College of Professional Studies supports its online students and alumni in their career journey!
The Career Ready Program provides tools and resources to help students explore and hone in on their career goals, search for jobs, create and improve professional documents, build professional network, learn interview skills, grow as a professional, and more. Come back often, at any time, as you move through your journey from career readiness as a student to career growth, satisfaction, and success as alumni.
The American Medical Association Manual (AMA) of Style, 11th edition is the required writing format for this course. Additional support for academic writing and AMA format is provided throughout the coursework as well as at the UNE Portal for Online Students.
Online resources: AMA Style Guide
The College of Professional Studies uses Turnitin to help deter plagiarism and to foster the proper attribution of sources. Turnitin provides comparative reports for submitted assignments that reflect similarities in other written works. This can include, but is not limited to, previously submitted assignments, internet articles, research journals, and academic databases.
Make sure to cite your sources appropriately as well as use your own words in synthesizing information from published literature. Webinars and workshops, included early in your coursework, will help guide best practices in APA citation and academic writing.
You can learn more about Turnitin in the guide on how to navigate your Similarity Report.
Please review the technical requirements for UNE Online Graduate Programs: Technical Requirements
Course surveys are one of the most important tools that University of New England uses for evaluating the quality of your education, and for providing meaningful feedback to instructors on their teaching. In order to assure that the feedback is both comprehensive and precise, we need to receive it from each student for each course. Evaluation access is distributed via UNE email at the beginning of the last week of the course.
Students are responsible for submitting work by the date indicated in Brightspace.
Quizzes and Tests: Quizzes and tests must be completed by the due date. They will not be accepted after the due date.
Assignments: Unless otherwise specified, assignments will be accepted up to 3 days late; however, there is a 10% grade reduction (from the total points) for the late submission. After three days the assignment will not be accepted.
Discussion posts: If the initial post is submitted late, but still within the discussion board week, there will be a 10% grade reduction from the total discussion grade (e.g., a 3 point discussion will be reduced by 0.3 points). Any posts submitted after the end of the Discussion Board week will not be graded.
Please make every effort ahead of time to contact your instructor and your student support specialist if you are not able to meet an assignment deadline. Arrangements for extenuating circumstances may be considered by faculty.
The policies contained within this document apply to all students in the College of Graduate and Professional Studies. It is each student's responsibility to know the contents of this handbook.
Please contact your student support specialist if you are considering dropping or withdrawing from a course. The last day to drop for 100% tuition refund is the 2nd day of the course. Financial Aid charges may still apply. Students using Financial Aid should contact the Financial Aid Office prior to withdrawing from a course.
The University of New England values academic integrity in all aspects of the educational experience. Academic dishonesty in any form undermines this standard and devalues the original contributions of others. It is the responsibility of all members of the University community to actively uphold the integrity of the academy; failure to act, for any reason, is not acceptable. For information about plagiarism and academic misconduct, please visit https://www.une.edu/studentlife/plagiarism.
Academic dishonesty includes, but is not limited to the following:
Charges of academic dishonesty will be reviewed by the Program Director. Penalties for students found responsible for violations may depend upon the seriousness and circumstances of the violation, the degree of premeditation involved, and/or the student’s previous record of violations. Appeal of a decision may be made to the Dean whose decision will be final. Student appeals will take place through the grievance process outlined in the student handbook.