This course explores legislation and regulation relating to health informatics. The course will examine the major laws and agency regulations governing healthcare technology, data collection, management, and privacy, as well as the security standards required for healthcare and health-related organizations. Students will explore the intent behind, and ethical dimensions of, health informatics regulatory frameworks, using case studies of recent health information uses, security breaches, and challenges to interoperability. This course will also look ahead to the impact of future Health IT regulations.
Please note that all times in the syllabus and in Blackboard refer to Eastern Time. The discussion board and assignment links for each week will open at the start of the week for submissions.
Weekly Discussion Posts – These assignments will assess your ability to clearly and accurately apply concepts from your readings and from your own experiences. Each week you are expected to submit an initial post and comment on at least 2 other students’ posts. You need to follow APA guidelines for citing any sources you may reference in either your initial post or your response to others. Refer to the Discussion Rubric and discussion question for submission guidelines.
Initial post: You should submit your initial post by 11:59 p.m. Sunday. Your initial post should be approximately 500 words.
Response to others: You should comment on at least 2 other students’ posts by 11:59 p.m. Wednesday. Your comments to others should be thorough, thoughtful, and they should offer some new content. Do not merely respond with “I agree” or “I disagree.” Engage directly with the ideas of your classmates and briefly mention which part of the post you are responding to.
Weekly Case Studies – During weeks 1 through 5, you will be reading case studies and answering questions to help you apply the concepts of this course. In one week, you will be presenting your case study as a video screencast presentation to be shared with the class. The week you will be presenting on will be assigned by your instructor at the beginning of the course, so do take note.
Research Paper – In week 7, you will submit a 5-7 page research paper that includes potential resolutions to current media coverage of the cybersecurity/hacking epidemic.
Your grade in this course will be determined by the following criteria:
Assessment Item | Possible Points | Percent of Total Grade |
---|---|---|
Weekly Case Studies, weeks 1 - 5 | 11 points each | 55% |
Discussion Posts | 3 points per discussion | 24% |
Research Paper | 21 points | 21% |
Total | 100 points | 100% |
Grade | Points Grade | Point Average (GPA) |
A | 94 – 100% | 4.00 |
A- | 90 – 93% | 3.75 |
B+ | 87 – 89% | 3.50 |
B | 84 – 86% | 3.00 |
B- | 80 – 83% | 2.75 |
C+ | 77 – 79% | 2.50 |
C | 74 – 76% | 2.00 |
C- | 70 – 73% | 1.75 |
D | 64 – 69% | 1.00 |
F | 00 – 63% | 0.00 |
Course learning modules are divided into weeks. Each week starts on Wednesday at 12:00 am Eastern Time (ET) and closes on Wednesday at 11:59 pm ET, with the exception of Week 8, which ends on Sunday. All assignments must be submitted by 11:59 pm ET on the due date.
Learning Modules | Topics | Assignments and Due Dates |
Week 1 Jun 24 – Jul 1 |
Introduction to the Fundamentals of Law for Health Informatics The Legal System in the United States |
Discussion – Initial post by Sunday, responses by Wednesday Case Study – Wednesday |
Week 2 Jul 1 – Jul 8 |
Consent and Release of Information |
Discussion – Initial post by Sunday, responses by Wednesday Case Study – Wednesday |
Week 3 Jul 8 – Jul 15 |
Legal Health Record |
Discussion – Initial post by Sunday, responses by Wednesday Case Study – Wednesday |
Week 4 Jul 15 – Jul 22 |
Corporate Compliance/Medical Staff Compliance |
Discussion – Initial post by Sunday, responses by Wednesday Case Study – Wednesday |
Week 5 Jul 22 – Jul 29 |
HIPAA Privacy and Security Rules |
Discussion – Initial post by Sunday, responses by Wednesday Case Study – Wednesday |
Week 6 Jul 29 – Aug 5 |
Information Risk and Management | Discussion Forum – Initial post by Sunday, responses by Wednesday |
Week 7 Aug 5 – Aug 12 |
Information Rights vs. Protection |
Discussion – Initial post by Sunday, responses by Wednesday Research Paper – Wednesday |
Week 8 Aug 12 – Aug 16 |
Cybersecurity Management | Discussion – Initial post by Friday, responses by Sunday |
Week 1 — Introduction to the Fundamentals of Law and our Legal System for Health Informatics
Learning Outcomes:
Readings:
Video:
Assignments:
Discussion Question: Who owns the patient health record and who controls the use of the information within the record? How does digital and mobile health complicate this? Think about a time when you (or someone you know) requested a copy of your health record. What format was it in — paper or digital? Please provide a short narrative about that experience.
Case Study Assignment (Read the case study from page 93 in your textbook and answer the questions that follow. Use APA formatting.): A member of the hospital’s medical staff has been accused of improperly billing Medicare for treatments done in his office that were not medically necessary. A subpoena for copies of patient records was received but the subpoena does not include a patient authorization for the release of records. In addition, the subpoena requests all “peer review committee” records pertaining to this physician. Consider the following questions:
Week 2 — Consent and Release of Information
Learning Outcomes:
Reading:
Assignments:
Discussion Question: In the early 2000s, the Terri Schiavo case brought attention to the people of America the importance of Advanced Directives, Living Wills, and DNR orders. This monumental case involved a woman in an irreversible vegetative state and her husband attempting to remove her feeding tube. After reviewing the Schiavo case in the provided link below, discuss your thoughts.
Quill TE. Terri schiavo — A tragedy compounded. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(16):1630-1633. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp058062. Accessed September 10, 2018. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp058062.
Case Study: Read the following case study and answer the questions which follow. Use APA formatting. In December 1981, Darrell Burch was found wandering along a Florida state highway with bruises, cuts and was disoriented. A person driving by picked him up and took him to a mental health center in Tallahassee which found that he was suffering from paranoid schizophrenia and in need of long-term treatment. A few days later Burch was transferred to Florida State Hospital. While at these facilities, Burch signed voluntary admission and consent-to-treatment forms. He remained at Florida State Hospital for five months, and soon after his release, he filed a complaint, stating he was inappropriately committed. He also stated that he did not remember signing any admission or treatment forms during or before his stay at the hospital. The complaint reached the Florida Human Rights Advocacy Committee which encouraged Burch to proceed with his grievance. In February of 1985, Burch filed a lawsuit in federal district court against both Apalachee Community Mental Health Services (the community mental health center in Tallahassee where he was first taken) and Florida State Hospital. In the lawsuit he stated that his constitutional rights had been violated when he was treated as a voluntary patient: because of evidence that his mental condition made him incapable of giving voluntary consent, he was entitled to the procedural safeguards of the involuntary placement procedure.
Read more about Zinermon v Burch, 494 US 113 (1990): https://mentalillnesspolicy.org/legal/informed-consent-zinermon-burch.html
Week 3 — Legal Health Record
Learning Outcomes:
Readings:
Assignment:
Discussion Question: Please describe how the implementation of electronic medical records has changed healthcare professionals’ charting habits. Consider the following actions: cut and pasting (cloning), the use of abbreviations, making changes and/or revisions to the health record, late entries, deletions, and any other bad or good habits from your reading. In your post and discussion with other, consider the following:
Case Study (Read the case study and answer the question that follows.Use APA formatting.): The director of health information management, as the custodian of medical records, is having a great deal of difficulty responding to subpoenas for patient records. The facility is in the midst of converting from a paper-based to an electronic patient record. Some information is on paper (such as consents), some information is scanned immediately following discharge (such as nurses’ notes), some information is automatically (COLD) fed into the EHR system (such as transcription reports) and some information resides only within electronic systems (such as lab results and physician orders). The process of finding and identifying the various parts of the patient’s record from the various sources is time-consuming and there is concern about ensuring the same response (that is, that the legal health record is produced) each time a record is requested. An attorney requested a record, followed by an additional request. What he received from the organization the first time was substantially different from what he received the second time. When the attorney deposed the custodian, many questions were raised about how record requests were handled. Questions were also raised about daily operational processes including how the patient’s legal health record was compiled in response to a subpoena, and if the resulting report was the true and complete record for the patient.
1. What steps should the director take to ensure that responses to subpoenas consistently result in the true and complete health record of a patient?
Week 4 — Corporate Compliance/Medical staff Compliance
Learning Outcomes:
Readings:
Reference:
Assignments:
Discussion Question: Is healthcare fraud and abuse is on the rise, or the decline? In what ways? How is fraud or abuse related, if at all, to the nationwide adoption of electronic medical records? Can you identify potential improvements? Please provide citations for your evidence-based responses.
Case Study: Read the case study from page 470 in your text and then answer the questions which follow. Use APA formatting. A hospital compliance auditor noticed during a routine audit that an unusually high number of pressure ulcers submitted on claims over the last six months were coded as state 3 or 4. A deeper analysis of the medical records revealed that an upgrade in the computer-assisted coding software had resulted in a glitch whereby the system was automatically assigning the codes for either a stage 3 or 4 pressure ulcer regardless of the stage identified in the clinical documentation. While the coders were supposed to review auto-assigned codes, they had missed the errors in the pressure ulcer codes. Since a stage 3 or 4 pressure ulcer is a major complication/comorbidity in the Medicare MS-DRG system, the coding error had led to inappropriate higher-paying MS-DRGs in some cases.
Week 5 — HIPAA Privacy and Security Rules
Learning Outcomes:
Readings:
Videos:
Assignments:
Discussion Question: This week you watched a series of short videos entitled Your Health Information, Your Rights which were designed for healthcare consumers. You have read and thought a lot about healthcare records from the perspective of healthcare providers, but it is important to consider them from the perspective of consumers as well. Please comment on something that jumped out at you from the videos. Was there anything in the videos that surprised you?
Case Study: Read the following case study and answer the questions which follow. Use APA formatting. Employee Unlawful Access to Hospital Records – A former UCLA Health System employee became the first person in the nation to be sentenced to federal prison for violating HIPAA. Huping Zhou, 47, of Los Angeles, was sentenced to four months in prison on April 27 after pleading guilty in January to four misdemeanor counts of accessing and reading the confidential medical records of his supervisors and high-profile celebrities, according to the US Attorney’s Office for the Central District of California. Zhou was also fined $2,000.
In 2003, Zhou, who was a licensed cardiothoracic surgeon in China before immigrating to the United States, was employed as a researcher with the UCLA School of Medicine. On October 29, 2003, Zhou received notice that UCLA intended to dismiss him for job performance reasons unrelated to the illegal access of medical records. That night, Zhou accessed and read his immediate supervisor’s medical records as well as those of other co-workers. Over the next three weeks, Zhou abused his access to the organization’s electronic health record system to view the medical records of celebrities and high-profile patients, including Drew Barrymore, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Tom Hanks, and Leonardo DiCaprio. According to court documents, Zhou accessed the UCLA record system 323 times during the three-week period. In the plea agreement, Zhou admitted he obtained and read patient health information on four specific occasions—with no legitimate reason, medical or otherwise—after he was terminated from his job. Zhou did not improperly use or attempt to sell any of the information he illegally accessed, according to the press release. In January Zhou’s attorney Edward Robinson was quoted in the UCLA student newspaper saying Zhou did not know that accessing the records was a federal crime.
Source: AHIMA. “Californian Sentenced to Prison for HIPAA Violation.” August 29, 2010. http://journal.ahima.org/2010/04/29/californian-sentenced-to-prison-for-hipaa-violation/
Week 6 — Information Risk and Management
Learning Outcomes:
Readings:
Assignments:
Discussion Question: With ransomware attacks on the rise, each healthcare organization must consider how they will deal with these attacks. Please offer your thoughts both for and against paying for healthcare data that is held ransom.
Preview of week 7, Research Paper: You should begin work on your research paper this week (week 6). You will turn in the paper next week (week 7). The description of the research paper is found under week 7.
Week 7 — Information Rights vs. Protection
Learning Outcomes:
Readings:
Assignments:
Discussion Question: Most states now have Health Information Exchange systems. The systems are either set-up as “opt-in” or “opt-out”. Determine what your state does (or what a neighboring state does). Do you know if your personal data is shared in your state? Discuss your thoughts and opinions about the ethics of this. Pay particular attention to the “tricky” areas of underage consent, mental health services, and HIV status.
Research Paper: Please review the current media coverage of the cybersecurity/hacking epidemic and consider potential resolution options. Your paper should include:
Students are encouraged to dig into any strategy that might work – even if not widely applied today. Consider both technology and policy approaches. Submission Requirements: 5-7 pages with at least 4 references. Please use at least two academic journals references and the other three or more can be any combination of industry articles/website, mainstream media (examples: New York Times, CNN, PBS, NPR) or other resources. Follow APA guidelines.
Week 8 — Cybersecurity Management
Learning Outcomes:
Readings:
Assignment:
Discussion Question: In this week’s reading, you considered how other parts of the world think about the privacy of healthcare data. Please discuss the different ways healthcare information is managed and the pros/cons to the different processes. Along with countries mentioned in your textbook, please research and find one more country (preferably a “third-world” or poverty-stricken location) and consider how that country may see privacy of healthcare information differently.
Your Student Support Specialist is a resource for you. Please don't hesitate to contact them for assistance, including, but not limited to course planning, current problems or issues in a course, technology concerns, or personal emergencies.
Questions? Visit the Student Support Health Informatics page
The Student Academic Success Center (SASC) offers a range of services to support your academic achievement, including tutoring, writing support, test prep and studying strategies, learning style consultations, and many online resources. To make an appointment for tutoring, writing support, or a learning specialist consultation, go to une.tutortrac.com. To access our online resources, including links, guides, and video tutorials, please visit:
Any student who would like to request, or ask any questions regarding, academic adjustments or accommodations must contact the Student Access Center at (207) 221-4438 or pcstudentaccess@une.edu. Student Access Center staff will evaluate the student's documentation and determine eligibility of accommodation(s) through the Student Access Center registration procedure.
Togetherall is a 24/7 communication and emotional support platform monitored by trained clinicians. It’s a safe place online to get things off your chest, have conversations, express yourself creatively, and learn how to manage your mental health. If sharing isn’t your thing, Togetherall has other tools and courses to help you look after yourself with plenty of resources to explore. Whether you’re struggling to cope, feeling low, or just need a place to talk, Togetherall can help you explore your feelings in a safe supportive environment. You can join Togetherall using your UNE email address.
Students should notify their Student Support Specialist and instructor in the event of a problem relating to a course. This notification should occur promptly and proactively to support timely resolution.
ITS Contact: Toll-Free Help Desk 24 hours/7 days per week at 1-877-518-4673.
The College of Professional Studies supports its online students and alumni in their career journey!
The Career Ready Program provides tools and resources to help students explore and hone in on their career goals, search for jobs, create and improve professional documents, build professional network, learn interview skills, grow as a professional, and more. Come back often, at any time, as you move through your journey from career readiness as a student to career growth, satisfaction, and success as alumni.
Please review the technical requirements for UNE Online Graduate Programs: Technical Requirements
The College of Professional Studies uses Turnitin to help deter plagiarism and to foster the proper attribution of sources. Turnitin provides comparative reports for submitted assignments that reflect similarities in other written works. This can include, but is not limited to, previously submitted assignments, internet articles, research journals, and academic databases.
Make sure to cite your sources appropriately as well as use your own words in synthesizing information from published literature. Webinars and workshops, included early in your coursework, will help guide best practices in APA citation and academic writing.
You can learn more about Turnitin in the guide on how to navigate your Similarity Report.
ITS Contact: Toll Free Help Desk 24 hours/7 days per week at 1-877-518-4673
Course surveys are one of the most important tools that University of New England uses for evaluating the quality of your education, and for providing meaningful feedback to instructors on their teaching. In order to assure that the feedback is both comprehensive and precise, we need to receive it from each student for each course. Evaluation access is distributed via UNE email at the beginning of the last week of the course.
Assignments: Late assignments will be accepted up to 3 days late; however, there is a 10% grade reduction (from the total points) for the late submission. After three days the assignment will not be accepted.
Discussion posts: If the initial post is submitted late, but still within the discussion board week, there will be a 10% grade reduction from the total discussion grade (e.g., a 3 point discussion will be reduced by 0.3 points). Any posts submitted after the end of the Discussion Board week will not be graded.
Please make every effort ahead of time to contact your instructor and your student support specialist if you are not able to meet an assignment deadline. Arrangements for extenuating circumstances may be considered by faculty.
8 week: Students taking online graduate courses through the College of Professional Studies will be administratively dropped for non-participation if a graded assignment/discussion post is not submitted before Sunday at 11:59 pm ET of the first week of the term. Reinstatement is at the purview of the Dean's Office.
16 week: Students taking online graduate courses through the College of Professional Studies will be administratively dropped for non-participation if a graded assignment/discussion post is not submitted before Friday at 11:59 pm ET of the second week of the term. Reinstatement is at the purview of the Dean's Office.
The policies contained within this document apply to all students in the College of Professional Studies. It is each student's responsibility to know the contents of this handbook.
Please contact your student support specialist if you are considering dropping or withdrawing from a course. The last day to drop for 100% tuition refund is the 2nd day of the course. Financial Aid charges may still apply. Students using Financial Aid should contact the Financial Aid Office prior to withdrawing from a course.
The University of New England values academic integrity in all aspects of the educational experience. Academic dishonesty in any form undermines this standard and devalues the original contributions of others. It is the responsibility of all members of the University community to actively uphold the integrity of the academy; failure to act, for any reason, is not acceptable. For information about plagiarism and academic misconduct, please visit UNE Plagiarism Policies.
Academic dishonesty includes, but is not limited to the following:
Charges of academic dishonesty will be reviewed by the Program Director. Penalties for students found responsible for violations may depend upon the seriousness and circumstances of the violation, the degree of premeditation involved, and/or the student’s previous record of violations. Appeal of a decision may be made to the Dean whose decision will be final. Student appeals will take place through the grievance process outlined in the student handbook.