The world about us provides for our life, but also can be dangerous to our health. This dichotomy is the essence of the study of environmental health. Students completing this course will be able to apply scientific knowledge to evaluate the risks that exist in the world about them.
This course is designed to provide students with an introduction to the field of environmental health in an ecosystems context. The course will emphasize the recognition, evaluation, and control of hazards including toxic chemicals, fibers and dust, ionizing radiation, and infectious agents. General principles and global processes will be linked to local issues and the regulatory environment through case studies and interviews with subject matter experts.
6. Discuss the means by which structural bias, social inequities and racism undermine health and create challenges to achieving health equity at organizational, community and societal levels
19. Communicate audience-appropriate public health content, both in writing and through oral presentation
Discussions (7 discussions at 3 points each)
Discussion posts: If the initial post is submitted late, but still within the discussion board week, there will be a 10% grade reduction from the total discussion grade (e.g., a 3 point discussion will be reduced by 0.3 points). Any posts submitted after the end of the Discussion Board week will not be graded. |
21 |
Written Assignments and Presentations
|
79 |
Total | 100 |
Grade | Points Grade | Point Average (GPA) |
A | 94 – 100% | 4.00 |
A- | 90 – 93% | 3.75 |
B+ | 87 – 89% | 3.50 |
B | 84 – 86% | 3.00 |
B- | 80 – 83% | 2.75 |
C+ | 77 – 79% | 2.50 |
C | 74 – 76% | 2.00 |
C- | 70 – 73% | 1.75 |
D | 64 – 69% | 1.00 |
F | 00 – 63% | 0.00 |
Week 1 | January 2 – January 9 |
Week 2 | January 9 – January 16 |
Week 3 | January 16 – January 23 |
Week 4 | January 23 – January 30 |
Week 5 | January 30 – February 6 |
Week 6 | February 6 – February 13 |
Week 7 | February 13 – February 20 |
Week 8 | February 20 – February 24 (Sunday) |
*See Blackboard for required and suggested weekly readings.
Original Contribution: How do you perceive today’s environment? Do you think it is better or worse than the generations that came before? What do you base your perception on? Give examples.
Response post: Choose a classmate’s post that expresses an opinion different than your own and respond with specific examples.
Original Contribution: Reflect on the readings and lectures this week. Discuss how one’s socioeconomic status influences choice in the living environment in terms of access to quality food/water, exposure to toxic chemicals, etc. Consider the role that structural bias and racism can play in both living environment and environmental exposure.
Response: What role do you feel that we as public health professionals should play in addressing these inequities within communities and society as a whole?
*Review the Final Project Document for detailed information about the components of the final project.
*Remember that you will need to choose a member of your government agency responsible for approving environmental projects to interview. Plan ahead as you choose your topic and attempt to set up an interview now.
While an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) covers many topics, you need to be concerned only with those issues that affect the health of populations. Note that the impact statement you will produce is an abbreviated version and a statement written in a professional field may be much longer.
Read the NIH paper that discusses the role of Health Impact Assessments (HIA) in an EIS before you decide on a project topic and create your outline.
Provide an outline of your project including:
This is only meant to be an informal outline. It can be a brief overview and a bulleted list of environmental/health impacts. It does not need to be presented in full narrative until the Impact Statement is due in Week 6.
Original Contribution: Look up the USDA standards for organic produce. Based on these standards, do you feel that organic produce is safer than other produce you can buy? Specifically, reference at least one USDA standard.
Response Post: Respond to at least one classmate. Using the USDA standards provided, argue the opposite of your classmate. The argument you give may be different than your own opinion.
Review the Final Project Document for more information about the interview, impact statement and final presentations.
Develop a set of interview questions. Four or five questions should be sufficient. Review the interview with Gil Dichter as an example of questions and keep in mind that you will use this information for your final presentations. Ensure that you ask questions that will be conducive to presenting the information in the context of your final impact statement and presentation.
Read this article from the Portland Press Herald dated 5/15/17
This article refers to a Journal Nature paper published 5/15/17:
Submit a transcript of your interview with a person knowledgeable about the topic of your impact statement topic. The transcript should be a typed version of your audio recording. Your interview should not be longer than 20 minutes. If you are not able to record your interview due to policies at their worksite, you should take detailed notes during the interview and transcribe these into a detailed transcript of the interview.
This does not have to be a person directly involved. For example, if you chose the dredging project you can contact a government agency responsible for dredging activity, such as the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers.
Original Contribution: What disease outcome is likely from an increase in global warming? Use outcome data from state and federal sources to support your argument.
Response Post: Respond to at least one classmate. What measures do you think can be taken to mitigate the level of damage done by the example your classmate gave?
Original Contribution: Proving an environmental hazard exists is difficult. The Civil Action movie demonstrated how difficult it is to make a case for a hazard in court. How different is making the case in legal court versus making the case in the court of public opinion?
Response Post: Respond to at least one classmate. Based on your classmate’s post, discuss how issues of structural inequities might affect how environmental hazards are dealt with in both legal cases and the court of public opinion.
Review the Final Project Document for an example format and requirements for the Impact Statement.
Submit your completed Impact Statement here.
Be prepared to defend your analysis before a decision-making body as you will need to do so in your presentations due next week.
Original Contribution: Select an environmental health issue that you would recommend a rule be developed to address, or that you feel an existing rule should be changed or eliminated. Present the argument that you would make in testimony to a rule-making session.
Response post: Do you think your classmate has a reason for a rule to be developed? Offer suggestions for how you think your classmate’s argument could be strengthened. If you disagree with their proposal, explain why.
*Review the Final Project Document for more information on the final presentation.
Submit your final presentation.
Original Contribution: Review the following: https://www.epa.gov/rcra. How has The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) changed how people are affected by hazardous waste dumping?
Response post: Do you agree or disagree with your classmates’ stance on this topic? Why?
Week 8 Assignment: Clean Air Act
Review the Clean Air Act, evaluating how successful this law has been in limiting primary pollutants. Reference specific elements within the act, and include evidence from peer-reviewed literature of primary pollutants and pre- and post- Clean Air Act occurrences to support your argument.
Your Student Support Specialist is a resource for you. Please don't hesitate to contact them for assistance, including, but not limited to course planning, current problems or issues in a course, technology concerns, or personal emergencies.
Questions? Visit the Student Support Public Health page
UNE's Student Academic Success Center (SASC) offers a range of free online services to support your academic achievement. Writing support, ESOL support, study strategy and learning style consultations, as well as downloadable resources, are available to all matriculating students. The SASC also offers tutoring for GPH 712 Epidemiology, GPH 716 Biostatistics, GPH 717 Applied Epidemiology, GPH 718 Biostatistics II, and GPH 719 Research Methods. To make an appointment for any of these services, go to une.tutortrac.com. For more information and to view and download writing and studying resources, please visit:
Any student who would like to request, or ask any questions regarding, academic adjustments or accommodations must contact the Student Access Center at (207) 221-4438 or pcstudentaccess@une.edu. Student Access Center staff will evaluate the student's documentation and determine eligibility of accommodation(s) through the Student Access Center registration procedure.
Togetherall is a 24/7 communication and emotional support platform monitored by trained clinicians. It’s a safe place online to get things off your chest, have conversations, express yourself creatively, and learn how to manage your mental health. If sharing isn’t your thing, Togetherall has other tools and courses to help you look after yourself with plenty of resources to explore. Whether you’re struggling to cope, feeling low, or just need a place to talk, Togetherall can help you explore your feelings in a safe supportive environment. You can join Togetherall using your UNE email address.
Students should notify their Student Support Specialist and instructor in the event of a problem relating to a course. This notification should occur promptly and proactively to support timely resolution.
ITS Contact: Toll-Free Help Desk 24 hours/7 days per week at 1-877-518-4673.
The College of Professional Studies supports its online students and alumni in their career journey!
The Career Ready Program provides tools and resources to help students explore and hone in on their career goals, search for jobs, create and improve professional documents, build professional network, learn interview skills, grow as a professional, and more. Come back often, at any time, as you move through your journey from career readiness as a student to career growth, satisfaction, and success as alumni.
The American Medical Association Manual (AMA) of Style, 11th edition is the required writing format for this course. Additional support for academic writing and AMA format is provided throughout the coursework as well as at the UNE Portal for Online Students.
Online resources: AMA Style Guide
The College of Professional Studies uses Turnitin to help deter plagiarism and to foster the proper attribution of sources. Turnitin provides comparative reports for submitted assignments that reflect similarities in other written works. This can include, but is not limited to, previously submitted assignments, internet articles, research journals, and academic databases.
Make sure to cite your sources appropriately as well as use your own words in synthesizing information from published literature. Webinars and workshops, included early in your coursework, will help guide best practices in APA citation and academic writing.
You can learn more about Turnitin in the guide on how to navigate your Similarity Report.
Please review the technical requirements for UNE Online Graduate Programs: Technical Requirements
Course surveys are one of the most important tools that University of New England uses for evaluating the quality of your education, and for providing meaningful feedback to instructors on their teaching. In order to assure that the feedback is both comprehensive and precise, we need to receive it from each student for each course. Evaluation access is distributed via UNE email at the beginning of the last week of the course.
Students are responsible for submitting work by the date indicated in Brightspace.
Quizzes and Tests: Quizzes and tests must be completed by the due date. They will not be accepted after the due date.
Assignments: Unless otherwise specified, assignments will be accepted up to 3 days late; however, there is a 10% grade reduction (from the total points) for the late submission. After three days the assignment will not be accepted.
Discussion posts: If the initial post is submitted late, but still within the discussion board week, there will be a 10% grade reduction from the total discussion grade (e.g., a 3 point discussion will be reduced by 0.3 points). Any posts submitted after the end of the Discussion Board week will not be graded.
Please make every effort ahead of time to contact your instructor and your student support specialist if you are not able to meet an assignment deadline. Arrangements for extenuating circumstances may be considered by faculty.
The policies contained within this document apply to all students in the College of Graduate and Professional Studies. It is each student's responsibility to know the contents of this handbook.
Please contact your student support specialist if you are considering dropping or withdrawing from a course. The last day to drop for 100% tuition refund is the 2nd day of the course. Financial Aid charges may still apply. Students using Financial Aid should contact the Financial Aid Office prior to withdrawing from a course.
The University of New England values academic integrity in all aspects of the educational experience. Academic dishonesty in any form undermines this standard and devalues the original contributions of others. It is the responsibility of all members of the University community to actively uphold the integrity of the academy; failure to act, for any reason, is not acceptable. For information about plagiarism and academic misconduct, please visit https://www.une.edu/studentlife/plagiarism.
Academic dishonesty includes, but is not limited to the following:
Charges of academic dishonesty will be reviewed by the Program Director. Penalties for students found responsible for violations may depend upon the seriousness and circumstances of the violation, the degree of premeditation involved, and/or the student’s previous record of violations. Appeal of a decision may be made to the Dean whose decision will be final. Student appeals will take place through the grievance process outlined in the student handbook.